HomeMy WebLinkAbout04 Public Response PUBLIC RESPONSE
ITEM DATE SUBMITTED BY
4CP'44- EAtuatitAt
(.f6) N-(tel 0 Depow. :50,0)2
V-TA-ut- t( //
it (0 P // /e
2R- 5 OPP°5)-difl,tv -7/3/0 AA) 4//diudgz
Swt Foulz'�-9 .-0 ( jea-a.hcc–
fg_ca
teq1-665k-0
1.1a,17:cd- ,-Re 2/ ( 14111 der-1G
l.�Q.$ Ifcrq- FI n d
REQUEST TO EXAMINE FILES
On C GI Z , 2001, I visited the Caldwell Community Development
Department and examined the case file for Case No. ` r' Z 6- 0 1 . I
requested copies of the following documents taken from the files:
I understand that this request to examine files will be made a part of the permanent file
regarding this case.
Print name Signature
411;
Sta i�
REQUEST TO EXAMINE FILES
• �'� / 0 2001, I visited the Caldwell Community Development
Department and examined the case file for Case No.< 72/ 19 . I
requested copies of the following documents taken from the files.
I understand that this request to examine files will be made a part of the permanent file
regarding this case.
/41/0/Ic e Aar
Print name ignature
zit era
Staff
Pe-- 2--
PAUL L. ALLDREDGE
July 3,2001
City of Caldwell
Steve Hasson, Community Development Director
Po Box 1177
Caldwell,Idaho 83605
Dear Mr.Hasson:
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me on the PUD#SUP-126-01PUD. I am a property
owner near this proposed project and I strongly object to this project for the following reasons:
1. The density is in violation of the City Comprehensive Plan based upon the proposed 20 units
per acre,which exceeds the plan by 220 percent.
2. Ingress and egress from the project is inadequate with a single point of entry and exit from the
project. Also,I don't believe the width of the entry exit lane would support two way traffic
based on an observation of the property.
3. The added traffic and numbers of trips in and out based on eighty-one units would deteriorate
the quality of life in the neighborhood.
4. The present zoning allows for 7-9 units per acre with that amount of additional traffic while
an increase would be tolerable if the entry and exit issues were resolved.
I am opposed to this project as it is currently proposed based on the density and detriment to
property values if this project is approved in its current form.
Sincerely,
Paul L.Alldredge
�
Qi
pR,-3
REQUEST TO EXAMINE FILES
411 P4.,r 2001, I visited the Caldwell Community Development
Department and examined the case file for Case No. 54P — !240 — v / . I
requested copies of the following documents taken from the files:
I understand that this request to examine files will be made a part of the permanent file
regarding this case.
Print nawee Sig ture
• LAAL4
Sta
t
,
r
lQ --- _
' 0.,„ ■ lb , , jA.4 1% , ' 7,4-4,-, b_t)1,j4\ Arvv ,
" .. f/S s .
Y\A„:tAA.A., ‘ f.7491.--L__: a,ik kit>40%.&-e .12)S. ' ' ' ±1. -)
.9‘A.0 si a_o_11_,14 te.... ..„, - ... .\)IIM , � t
L./ &kiAmritii. v..e."146.4..L___-
-- -r-.61Qt-
----- (3: ---1
\( 11k-)
c _tkx-ta___%.
- Ps)
( ' -.. . /l r-=---
'7t : Y\1 vt4A-4A-A. \NVLA S.., . ,
allao\A, ) 0J-r. 41' 3 /e 0
42S
,_„4
1--6) - �yv�uL Cep-YC v
Sup
4j. 6-uyi
liv - w_-e_ //6-tyl,,c"
tfuz. p.6(AA,
�a l C / v .7)-2-64 ///: s/4 1c-cam' dud-
let-t
zy /ice L. GC/�' M%�-'�--'�"� r
c Ca ll VE a=lb Lcil d
JUL -g 2001
REQUEST TO EXAMINE FILES
On , 2001, I visited the Caldwell Community Development
Department and examined the case file for Case No. j £)/ b� , I
requested copies of the following documents taken from the files:
Otde„,( o
I understand that this request to examine files will be made a part of the permanent file
regarding this case.
40111°
Print Kame i na • -
�9
EA ILL 4
Staff