HomeMy WebLinkAbout1-31-1991 CHPC MINUTES .►
�, i •
.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES
Mesting of January 31, 1992
The meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of January
31, 1991 was called to order in the City Hall Conference Room by
Chairman Chuck Randolph at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Chairman Chuck Randolph, Bill Gigray III, Nathelle
Oates, Tom Ensley, Madeline Buckendorf, Art Honey anci Dennis
Crooks.
The first item of business involved the minutes from the January
3, 1991 meeting. Bill Gigray III moved to approve the minutes.
Tom Ensley seconded the motion and the minutes were unanimously
approved as submitted.
;
The next item on the agenda involved a review of the Historic
component to the City's Comprehensive Plan. There was discussion
and consideration of minor revisions to the obJectives section
and also the implementation/policies section of the component.
Dennis Crooks indicated that the changes would be incorporated
into the written document and redistributed to the Commission for
review at the next meeting.
The next item on tne agenda was a review and update of the 1991
grant appl�cation. Dennis Crooks indicated that oniy one
positive r�sponse had been received from the list of c�nsultants
invited to applv for the project.
Additional discussion occurred pertaining to the scope and
objec�ive or the study and specifically whether intensive
research on �he history of Cleveland Boulevard was feGsible.
After same deliberation, it was the consensus of the Commission
to place the focus of the study on the survey of historic sites
and buildings 3nd that research on Cleveland Boulevard should not
be erriphasized. Also, it was indicated that the historic
significance of Cleveland Boulevard was sometning that could be
pursued independent?y by the Commission.
The Commission then began to discuss the selection process of the
sites to be surveyed and criteria to be utilized. It was noted
that some of the residences had been physically altered which may
have had an effect on the structure's architectural integrity. �
Also questioned, was whether architectural significance or I
historic significance should have priority when choosing survey I
candidates . Dr�ft site lists were then reviewed. Dennis i
indicated he would consolidate the list of addresses and prepare
and distribute a new list to the Commission members.
1
� � � �
.
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
with the next meeting scheduled for March 7, 1991 at 7:00 p.m.
in the Council Conference Room.
� Prepared by,
I
v' "O�L� ;
Dennis Crooks, Director
Planning and Zoning
2