The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2-10-2009 P&Z MINUTES r -�,� CALDWELL PLANNING AND ZONING COMNIISSION NIINUTES P �i��' � _,. February 10, 2009 �� '`=-� ' Because there was a problem with the recording device, these minutes are a summary of the Hearing on February 10, 2009. I. Call to Order —Chairperson Jakobson called the rneeting to order for the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. II. Roll Call — Members Present: 1Vlike Jakobson, Vincei�t Sancl�ez, Betty TolJman, James :Runsvold, Gene Shaffer Disclosures: None Members Absent: Geoff OldenKamp Staff Present: Anne Marie Skiuner (Senior Planner), Brent Orton (City Eugineer), Bria�n Billin�sley (Planning Director), Savani7a Davis (Admi�listrative Secretary) Review of Proceeding —Chairperson Jakobson annnunced the proceduces for the public hearing. III. OLD BUSINESS A. Approve Minutes of December 9, 2008 meeting as signed by Chairperson Jakobson on December 27, 2008. B. Re-Appoint Mike Jakobson as Chairperson MOTION: Commissioner Runsvold SECOND: Commissioner Sanchez Passed: Unanimous roll call vote. C. Appoint Geoff O1denKamp as Vice Chairperson MOTION: Commissioner Runsvold SECUND: Commissioner Tollman Passed: Unanimous roll call vote. IV. NEW BUSINESS A. Case Number SUB-160P(E)-06 a request by Kevin Howell and Gary Lee for a one- year time extension for the preliminary plat of Sierra Ridge Subdivision located at the northwest corner of the Intersection of Farmway Road and Ustick Road. Testimony: 1) Anne Marie Skinner, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and submitted an aerial map of the site labeled as PZ-1000. Ms. Skinner then explained the reason for a time extension for members of the audience. 2) Gary Lee, applicant's representative, signed in favor of the application and .:a,.a .. _.:..,�,-,..,�:...,.�.. j�iv"v�ucu �uj,pv�u�� w��iuivii_y. i' , -� 3) Norman Higer signed in opposition to the application and stated his concerns for the sizing of lots. 4) The commission discussed the benefits of larger lots versus what was approved in Sierra Ridge Subdivision. MOTION TO CLOSE TESTIMONY: Commissioner Runsvold SECOND: C'ommissioner Tollman Passed: Unanimous roll call vote. Findings of Fact on Case Number SUB-160P(E)-06 — Accepteci MOTION: Commissioner Runsvold S�COND: Cornmissioner Sl�affer Passed: Unani:mous roll call vote. Conclusions of Law on Case No. SUB-160P(E)-06 —The conclusions of l.aw were read and accepted. MOTION: Commissioner Runsvold SCCOND: Commissioner Sanchez Passecl: Unanimous roll call vote. ORDER OF DECISION on Case No. SUB-160P(E)-06 - MOTION: Co�n�nissioner Runsvold SECOND: Commissioner Si�affer Approved witl� the conditions as listed in t1�e written staCC re}�ort as well as the following: Aciditional coadition: All the perimeter lots, with the exception of those lots directly adjacent to Farmway Road or Ustick Road, shall be increased to a minimum 8,000 square feet in size. B. Case Number SUB-164P(E)-06 a request by Freehold Development and WH Pacific for a one-year time extension for the preliminary plat of Sky Ranch Business Center No. 2 located approximately 1200 feet south of Highway 20/26 and 300 feet east of Aviation Way. `Testimony: 1) Anne Marie Skinner, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and submitted an aerial map labeled as PZ-1000. 2) Travis Foster, applicant's representative, signed in favor of the application and provided supporting testimony. 3) David Szplett signed in as neutral and submitted a packet of potential roadway proposals which was labeled as e�ibit PZ-1001. Mr. Szplett stated his concerns for the negative effect the current roadway proposal for Aviation Way could have on the proposed Crown Point Subdivision. Mr Szplett stated that he is in agreement with the roadway proposal shown on page 3 of Exhibit PZ- 1041 as long as a condition was set forth that would allow strictly truck access to Crown Point Subdivision. 4) Anne Marie Skinner clarified that the only proposed subdivision that the Planning & Zoning Commission can make recommendations or conditions on is the one-year time extension for Sky Ranch Business Center No. 2. Crown D.. .-,4 C'„l.rl�. �1- �n nn �aor� tnnirt�l � t vi,�� vuvui✓i.�iiv i iu i.v� v..ii.6 .......... ....i.,.b.... . . .- � 5) Mr. Foster rebutted by stating that the applicant is in agreement with the current roadway proposal on page 3 of exhibit PZ-1001. MOTION TO CLOSE TESTIMONY: Comtnissioner Runsvold SECOND: Commissioner Shaffe► Passed: Unanimous roll call vote. Findings of Fact on Case Number SUB-164P(E)-06 — Accepted MOTION: Commissioner Runsvold SECOND: Com:missioner Sanchez Passed: Unanimous ro(I call vote. Conclusions of Law on Case No. SUB-164P(E)-06 —Tl�e coiicl«sions of law were read and acce�rted. MOTION: Commissioner Runsvold SECON.D: Commissioner Sancl.lez Passed: Unanimous roll call vote. ORDF.,R OF DECISION on Case No. SUB-164P(E)-06 - 1VIOTION: Coi��missioner Runsvold SCCOND: Commissioner Shaffer. The Commission voted unanimously to Appro��e with tl�e conditions as listed in the written staff report. C. Case Number OA-111-09 a request by Caldwell's Planning and Zoning Director to amend the current zoning map. Testimony: 1) Anne Marie Skinner, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and submitted a zoning map labeled as PZ-1000. Findings of Fact on Case Number OA-111-09— Accepted MOTION: Commissioner Shaffer SECONU: Co�nmissioner Rui.isvold Passed: Unaiiimous roll ca11 vote. Conclusions of Law on Case No. OA-111-09—The conclusions of law were read and aecepted. MOTION: Commissioi�er Sancl�ez SECOND: Commissioner Runsvold Passed: Unanimous roll call vote. Recor�mendation on Case No. OA-111-09- MOT[ON: Commissioner Shaffer SECOND: Commissioner Runsvold. The Co��nmission voted unanimously io Recommend Approval. D. Case Number OA-110-08 a request by Caldwell's Planning and Zoning Department for an ordinance amendment to section 10-02-06, concerning the sign schedule, of the Caldwell City Code. � �. . 1 Testimony: 1) Anne Marie Skinner, Senior Planner, presented the proposed changes to the current sign ordinance as well as outlining the history behind the reasons for the changes. 2) The commission conversed about the current sign ordinance, what changes have been made already, the proposed changes and the impact all the changes have had/will have on the community. Comprehensive Plan Analysis OA-111-08 — Accepted MOTION: Comm:issioner Runsvold SECOND: Commissioner Tolltllan Passec#: Unanimous roll call vote. Recommendation on Case No. OA-111-08 - IV10"TION: Commissioner Tollman SECOND: Commissioner Shaffer. Tl�e Co�nmission voted unanimously to Recommend AppravaL V. Planning Issues • Commissioner Shaffer expressed his coi�cerns for the lack of landscaping along the I-84 Interstate. Mr. Shaffer suggested that the city inlplement an ordina��ce that woulci require a 50-foot wide iandscaping buffer alar�g any property that borders the Interstate. • A11ne Marie Slcinner, Sei�ior Plai�ner, explai:ned that the City 7oning Ordinance does require a 30-faot wide la�idscaping butfer along the Interstate. However there has not been any development completed along the Interstate since that cequirement 11as gone into etfect VI. Adjournment Adjourn public Izearing MOTION: Commissioner Runsvold SECOND: Commissioner Tollman Passed: Unanimous roll ca.11 vote. The meeting was adjourned at 9:03 pm. MINUTES APPR�VED f1ND 5I(:rNED BY CE1l1IRPERSON MIKE JAKOBSON ON TF{E DATE NOTED BELOW: :� �� '� � a� � Mike Jako'bson llate ----�-_ P A•r�r��s�r: Senior Plamier