The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12-12-2006 P&Z MINUTES F � � rAI I1WF1 1 PI ANNINIr JL'7(1AlIAir �`f1MMICCI�"11U ..,-.�..., . . � �.,. . "--.......... ... �.......... ...............r..... MINUTES December 12 , ZOOG �APPR�DV�C] cc I. Call to Order — Chairman Alldredge called the meeting to order for the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. II. Roll Call — Members Present: Paul Alldredge, Gene Shaffer, James Runsvold, Jack Teraberry, Joyce Griffith and Michael Jakobson. Disclosures: none Members Absent: Scott Wallace Staff Present: Brian Billingsley (Planning Director), Anne Marie Skinner (Senior Planner), Brent Orton (City Engineer), Savanna Davis (Secretary), April Cabello (Planning Technician). III. Review of Proceeding — Chairman Paul Alldredge announced the procedures for the public hearing. • Old Business Approve minutes of November 14, 2006 meeting. MOTION: Commissioner Jakobson SECOND: Commissioner Teraberry. Passed: Unanimous roll call vote. ......................................................................... New Business Commissioner Alldredge stated that the case noted as letter C. on the agenda will be continued to January's meeting. A. NUMBER ANN-141-06 & ZON-50-06, a request by Oakwood Enterprises for annexation of 6.67 acres with C-2 (Community Commercial), rezone approval of 4.13 acres from R-3 (Multi-family High Density Residential) to C-2 (Community Commercial), a Comprehensive plan map amendment from Agriculture to Commercial and a development agreement. The site is located at 5022 highway 20/26. � 1. Commissioner Paul Alldredge stated that the applicant had not • arrived at the meeting yet and this case would be moved to the end of the agenda. B. CASE NUMBER ANN-139-06 & SUB-162P-06, a request by RMC Construction, LLC, for annexation of 40.37 acres with R-1 (Single- Family Residential) zoning, a development agreement, and preliminary plat approval of Hamilton Estates Subdivision containing 152 residential lots and 9 commons lots. The site is generally located on the east side of South Florida Avenue between Laster Lane and Homedale Road. 1. Anne Marie Skinner presented the staff report and stated that staff is recommending that lot number 4 in block 5 be removed from the plat to make easier access for emergency vehicles. She also clarified that 11.35 in the staff report had an error in it. Lot number 63 needed to be changed to lot number 4 due to a revised plat that was submitted. 2. Brent Orton, city engineer, stated that item 2 in the staff report on page 6 of 18, needed to be changed to 22 % from 103%. 3. Rita Earl, applicant's representative, submitted exhibit` PZ-1000 a revised preliminary plat. She stated that Mr. Powell will be deeding over right of way to the city. She also clarified that as opposed to what • the staff report stated the developers are not asking for any phase extensions. The developers will have 24 months to complete the first phase and 12 months for each additional phase. 4. Commissioner Alldredge stated that item number 11.32 will be deleted from the staff report. 5. Ms. Earl stated that she does not believe that item 2 on page 6 of 18, concerning traffic mitigations for east bound and west bound turn lanes, should be this development's responsibility. She also stated that the applicant is agreeable to installing a four way stop at Ustick Rd. and Florida Ave. Ms. Earl stated that she would like to leave this item open so that they can continue working with the engineering department to come to a resolution before going to city council. Ms. Earl expressed her concerns for the storm water policy and the additional language "and any updates adopted subsequent to the application." Ms. Earl stated that their firm did go back and recalculate the usable open space and this development is at approximately 9% which does not include any storm retention areas. Ms. Earl expressed her concerns regarding staff's request for pathways. 6. Commissioner Shaffer asked Ms. Earl to repeat the percentages for the lot sizes. � • 7. Ms. Earl stated that the percentaqes were as follows: • 6,000-6,999: 104 lots 69% - • 7,000-7,999: 32 lots 21 % • 8,000-8,999: 8 lots 3% • 9,000-9,999: 5 lots 3% • 10,000 & up: 6 lots 4% 8. Commissioner Runsvold stated that he would like to see a pathway on one or both sides of the lateral. 9. Ms. Earl stated that the developer would be willing to put a pathway on one side of the lateral. 10. Commissioner Alldredge asked Ms. Earl to clarify that in the event that they tile the lateral would it become a lot extension? 11. Ms Earl stated that it would not. 12. Commissioner Alldredge asked Brent Orton if it would be feasible to put a pathway in all the way to Laster Ln. 13. Mr. Orton said that it would be feasible. 14.Anne Marie Skinner agreed. 15. Ms. Earl stated that it was her understanding that if the lateral is tiled the ordinance does not require a pathway. Just an open space that is to be landscaped. , 16. Commissioner Teraberry asked if Laster Lane would be built in by the developer. 17. Ms. Earl stated that the developer would be building half plus 7.5 of 28 feet of their portion of the street with a total of 33 feet. 18. Mr. Orton stated that he was open to more discussion regarding the traffic mitigations in time to offer something to the City Council. Mr. Orton stated that the city would rather leave the 4 way stop on Ustick Rd. and Florida Ave. the way it is. He also commented on the fact that the developer of the proposed subdivision Hamilton Estates wotald not be responsible for turn lanes on the Ustick and Florida intersection. Mr. Orton stated that typically the city waits until there is a subdivision that is developed closer to the intersection because it will have the most I impact on the intersection. � 19. Commissioner Alldredge asked if the City had a plan of action to improve Ustick Rd. 20. Mr. Orton stated that the plan to improve Ustick Rd. is through development followed by capitol improvement. 21. Ms. Earl clarified that they had asked that the statement regarding adoption for subsequent updates to the storm water be removed. 22. Mr. Orton stated that he did not see a problem with the language being modified. Mr. Orton stated that he would like to be able to retain something in the development agreement stating that if redevelopment � occurred at some point the Caldwell Engineering department would • expect any redevelopment to conform to the existing policy in effect at that time. 23. Ms. Earl clarified that the developer will have 4 years to complete this project and would like to work with staff to formulate a statement to put in the development agreement to that effect. Ms. Earl stated that staff has requested another pathway from Jake Ave. into the park area and she stated that the developer does not feel that another pathway would benefit the community and wishes not to forfeit lot # 4 to do so. 24. Commissioner Griffith expressed her concerns for the cul-de-sacs on the plat. 25. Brian Billingsley, Planning Director, suggested that Ms. Earl address the commission about the type of housing that would be in the development. 26. Ms. Earl stated that there would be a mixture of different levels of housing. 27. Commissioner Alldredge suggested the restriction of vinyl, aluminum and steel siding. 28. Commissioner Shaffer expressed his concerns for how the lateral crossing is going to be treated. 29. Ms. Earl stated that the developer would like to tile the lateral and in the event that the entire lateral is not tiled the developer would like to be able to come back and work with city staff to address all concerns. 30. Commissioner Jakobson asked Ms. Earl what size tile the developer . was thinking about using. 31. Ms. Earl stated that they would use 3— 4 feet tile. 32. Commissioner Shaffer made a statement about how this engineering firm does not typically present subdivisions with this number of cul-de- sacs. MOTION TO CLOSE TESTIMONY: Commissioner Shaffer SECOND: Commissioner Runsvold Passed: Unanimous roll cal! vote. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed some concerns about whether to approve or continue this case. Comprehensive Plan Analysis — Analysis not accepted MOTION: Commissioner Griffith SECOND: Commissioner Jakobson. Passed: Unanimous roll call vote. Findings of Fact on Case No. ANN-139-06 — MOTION: Commissioner Shaffer SECOND: Commissioner Jakobson Findings of Fact on Case No. SUB-162P-06 — MOTION: Commissioner Shaffer SECOND: Commissioner Teraberry � , „ Order on Case No. ANN-139-06 - MOTION: Commissioner Griffith • SECOND: Commissioner Teraberry. The Commission voted to recommend approval of the request as submitted with condition 8.2. Passed: Unanimous roll call vote. Conclusions of Law on Case No. SUB-162P-06 —The conclusions of law were read and accepted. Order on Case No. SUB-162P-06 - MOTION: Commissioner Shaffer SECOND: Commissioner Runsvold. The Commission voted to recommend Denial of the request as submitted for the purpose of having the plat re-drawn to consider the cu-de-sacs and the connectivity. They further recommended to City ouncil the following conditions of approval: . ",;,,,�a � �u. Q�.� -�.�,�� .-�- �� • Kee 11.35 � p • Eliminate 11.32 • Eliminate abutments • Change traffic mitigations • 11.35 lot # 64 correction lot #4 • no steel, aluminum, or vinyl siding Passed: Unanimous roll call vote. � ......................................................................... C. CASE NUMBER ANN-134-06 & SUB-160P-06, a request by Stanley Consultants, for annexation of 91.07 acres with R-1 (Single-Family Residential0 zoning, a Comprehensive Plan map amendment from Agriculture to low Density Residential, a development agreement and preliminary plat approval of Mandalay Ranch Subdivision containing 321 residential lots and 11 common lots. The site is generally located west of Middleton Road and north of Highway 20-26 Kevin A. Howell. MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE- MOTION: Commissioner Teraberry SECOND: Commissioner Runsvold Passed: Unanimous roll call vote. ......................................................................... VI. Planning Issues: There was brief discussion about the Comprehensive plan. VII. Adjournment: Commissioner Shaffer SECOND: Commissioner • Teraberry. Passed: Unanimous roll call vote. � . � h • The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. MINUTES APPROVED AND SIGNED BY CHAIRMAN PAUL ALLDREDGE ON E...DA,.TE NOTED BELOW: � `- __ ��'' l'� -��?% Attest: � <_ r Paul Alidredge Date - - � Community Development Director � �