Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-08-16city council minutesBook 34 REGULAR MEETING August 16, 1993 7:30 p.m. The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Dakan. The Mayor requested that everyone stand for the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Page 162 The Roll of the City Council was called with the following members present: Raymond, Ozuna, Simmons, Carpenter, and Houchins. Absent: Nancolas. (ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA) The Mayor asked for the addition of several items to the prepared Agenda: A right -of -way deed for a portion of the west half of Kimball Avenue and a utility easement from John Ashman; consideration of appealing a conditional use permit; and award a bid for the Arthur - Main sewer replacement. The three items would be included as the first items under New Business. MOVED by Raymond, SECONDED by Ozuna that the Agenda be accepted as amended. Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Raymond, Ozuna, Simmons, Carpenter, and Houchins. Those voting no: none. Absent and not voting: Nancolas. MOTION CARRIED CONSENT CALENDAR The following items on the Consent Calendar were presented by the Mayor to the Members of the City Council: 1. Dispense with the reading of the minutes of the August 2, 1993, City Council Meeting and approve as written; 2. Accept the minutes of the Caldwell Airport Commission Meeting of August 5, 1993; 3. Accept a right of way deed from Debbie Bland for a portion of the east half of Airport Avenue south of Linden Street. MOVED by Raymond, SECONDED by Houchins to accept the Consent Calendar as presented by the Mayor. Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Raymond, Ozuna, Simmons, Carpenter, and Houchins. Those voting no: none. Absent and not voting: Nancolas. MOTION CARRIED OLD BUSINESS (Third reading of Bill No. 15 - Amend Code to provide for Board of Appeals for Building /Fire) Mayor Dakan read Bill No. 15 by title only as follows: AN ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF CALDWELL, COUNTY OF CANYON, STATE OF IDAHO, BY AMENDING TITLE I, CHAPTER 26, SECTION 3, BY THE ADDITION THERETO OF A NEW SUBSECTION (D) PROVIDING FOR ORDERS, DECISIONS OR DETERMINATIONS MADE BY THE PUBLIC WORKS Book 34 Page 163 DIRECTOR UNDER 'TITLE IL =, CHAPTEIR 4, MUNICIPAL :ODE OF THE CITY OF CALDWELL, '.,ND TO AP PEALS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS UNDER THE UNIEOIRM BUIi.rJING, PLUMEING, ELECTRICAL, HOUSING, MECHANICAL AND FIRE CODES AND UNDER TITLE V. CHAPTERS 1, 2, 3, 5, 12 AND TITLE X, CITAPTER CALDWELL CITY CODE; AND AMENDING TITLE I, C -TER 26, SECTIOi�T 7, BY "7.: E ADDIT'I'ON THis:Rl770 OF -'LL NEW SU'SSECTION (E) PROVIDING FOR TIIE APPOINTMENT un SAID DOARDS OF APPEALS AS ?EARING 7XAMINERS UNDER TITLE I, CHAPTI:,R 26, S; CTION MUNIC ". -PAL COD"? OF 'f= CITY OF CA7: DWELL . MOVED by Ozuna, SECONDED by Houclins that B_i..11 No. 15 be passe and en - -itled Crdinanc ^_ No. 1990 after the three readinq� by tit'_e only. Roll cal]. vote. Those voting ln.s: Ozuna, Simmons, Carpenter, HouchinW, and 1',ymond. Those voting no: none. Absent and not voting: Nancolas. MOTION CARRI,'�D (SECOND READING OF BILL F?O. 22 - AMEITD CITY CODE .PERTAINING TO REQUIREMENTS FOR DPI SCHARGI, INTO TFE, CALDWELL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT) Th_. Mayor read Bill No. 22 by title only e.s follows: AN ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF 'T4E CITY OF CALDWEL'_ COUl "" OF CANYON, S'1 OF IDAHO, REPEALING CHAPTER Z. TITLE -III, ADDING A N-W CHAPTER 4, TITLE III, SEC 1 THROUGii 17, REGARDING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DISCHARGE INTO THE CALDWELL WASTFFti?I,-TER TREATMENT AND COLLET "ION SYSTEM; PROVIDING A PURPOSE AND INTENT; PROVIDING OBJECTIVES; PROVIDING AND STATING THE A' PLICABILITY OF THE ORDINANCE; PROVIDING =^OR DEFINITIONS OF TERMS OF WORDS, PT.- IRASES 7 \uITD ABBREVIATIONS; PROHIBITING THE INTRODUCTION INTO THE POTW OF ANY POLLUTANTS OR WASTEW� =R CAUSING :SASS TIiROUGH OR INTriRFERENCE; a=R.OHIBI'I_NG SPECIFIED DISCHARGE O7 CERTAIN POLLUTANTS AND WASTEWATER INTO TIE POTW; PROVIDING FOR LIMITATIONS OF WAS'= BWATER STRENGTH; PROVIDING A SPE.CIFICAT "FON FOR LOCAL LIMITS OF SPECIFIC POLLUTANTS; PROVIDING MA ?. 7 M I DAILY LIMITS OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC POLLUTANTS; PROHIBITING EYCESSIVE FLOW !-'.ND/OR POLLUTANT DISCHARGE RATES CAUSING= TREATMENT PROCESS UPSET OR LOSS OF TREATMENT EFFICIENCY; PROHIBITING, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED, AN INDUSTRIAL USEP'S INCREASE IN THE USE OF POTABLE OR PROCESSED WATER OR OTHER ATTEMPTS TO DILUTE DISCHARGE AS SUSS'T-'TUTE FOP. ADEQ -TATE TR:=;',ATMENT; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL AGREEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR A RIGHT TO AMEND WAS. - EWATER L'ISCHARGE PERMITS; PROVIlI::i:NG FOR I TAINING THE RIGHT TO AMEND WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS ISSUED TO A SIGNIFlCwANT INDUSTRIAL ?JSER; REQT7IRING A USER TO PROVIDE NI'.CESSAR.I WASTEWATER TREATMENT AS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITI: TI1 ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR Tl: ESTABLISHMENT OF DEADLT_NES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE PRETREATMENT STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR MAY REQUIRE A USER TO RESTRICT DISCHARGE DT_RING PEAK FLOW PERIODS OR TO DESIGNATED LOCATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS SOLELY FOR FLOW EQUIlL I ZAT I ON i PROVIDING FOR PRESOIL AND SAND INTERCT',PTORS; PROVIDING FOR COMBUSTIBLE GAS DETECTION METERS; PROVIDING AND 'REQUIRING A USER TO DEVELOP ANTI TNILEMEN "C' ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE/SLUG CONTROL PLANS AND PR0�7IDING :'.'CR. THE CONTENTS OF THOSE PLANS; PROVIDING AND REQL.:IRING FOR, THE NOTIFICATION OF A SLUG OR ACCIDENTAL DISCriTJ.GE; PROVIDING TND REQUIR.7.NG THAT, WITH-:N FIVE DAYS OF AN ACCIDENTAL; DISCHARGE; PROVIDING THAT WIT`IHI_N FIVE. D%';?S OF ;?N ACCIDENTAL SPILL THE USER SHALL SUMMIT A Book 34 DETAILED WRITTEN REPORT DESCRIBING THE CAUSE AND MEASURES TAKEN TO PREVENT SIMILAR FUTURE OCCURRENCES; PROVIDING THAT PERMANENT SIGNS BE POSTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH NOTIFICATION FOR SLUG AND ACCIDEN'T'AL DISCHARGE; PROVIDING FOR REGULATION OF SEPTIC WASTE DISCHARGE INTO THE POTW; PROVIDING FOR THE PROMULGATION AND REVISION OF A POTW /USE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FOR NOTICE ANI) HEARING AND PASSAGE BY THE CITY COUNCIL; PROVIDING FOR THE PROMULGATION AND REVISION OF AN ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE PLAN AND FOR NOTICE AND HEARING AND PASSAGE BY THE CITY COUNCIL; PROVIDING FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT /SPECIAL AGREEMENT PERMIT MONITORING, INSPECTION AND SURVEYANCE CHARGES AND FEES; PROVIDING FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR A SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER; PROVIDING A PROCEDURE AND TIMETABLE FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS FOR AN EXISTING SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER AND FOR A NEW SOURCE AND NEW USERS; PROVIDING FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS FOR AN EXTRA - JURISDICTIONAL USER; PROVIDING FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION CONTENTS; PROVIDING FOR A USER TO SUBMIT INFORMATION CONCERNING AVERAGE AND MAXIMUM DAILY FLOW FOR A CATEGORICAL AND NON - CATEGORICAL USER; PROVIDING FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF POLLUTANTS FOR A CATEGORICAL AND NON- CATEGORICAL USER; PROVIDING FOR A CERTIFICATION BY A. QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL INDICATING WHETHER APPLICABLE PRETREATMENT STANDARDS ARE BEING MET; PROVIDING A COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE FOR PRETREATMENT; REQUIRING ALL WASTEWATER PERMIT APPLICATIONS AND USER REPORTS TO BE SIGNED BY AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE USER; PROVIDING THE LANGUAGE FOR CERTIFICATION STATEMENTS; PROVIDING THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SHALL EVALUATE DATA FURNISHED BY A USER; PROVIDING AND SPECIFYING WASTEWATER PERMIT CONTENTS AND CONDITIONS, BOTH MANDATORY AND DISCRETIONARY; PROVIDING FOR A LIMITATION OF THE DURATION OF WASTEWATER PERMITS; PROVIDING A PROCEDURE FOR THE MODIFICATION OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS; PROVIDING THAT A WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT IS VOIDABLE UPON CESSATION OF OPERATIONS OR TRANSFER OF BUSINESS; PROVIDING A PROCEDURE FOR THE TRANSFER OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS; PROVIDING A PROCEDURE FOR THE REVOCATION OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS; PROVIDING A PROCEDURE FOR THE REISSUANCE OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS; PROVIDING FOR A TIMETABLE WITHIN WHICH INITIAL AND FINAL COMPLIANCE REPORT FORMS MUST BE FILED; PROVIDING AND REQUIRING PERIODIC COMPLIANCE REPORTS AND THE INFORMATION REQUIRED THEREIN; PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES FOR MEETING APPLICABLE PRETREATMENT S'T'ANDARDS; REQUIRING ANY USER OPERATING UNDER A WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT INCORPORATING EQUIVALENT MASS OR CONCENTRATION LIMITS TO NOTIFY THE CITY WITHIN A PRESCRIBED TIME OF SIGNIFICANT PRODUCTION LEVEL CHANGES; REQUIRING ANY USER DISCHARGING A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN A CALENDAR MONTH OR ANY AMOUNT OF ACUTELY HAZARDOUS WASTE, AS DEFINED, TO REPORT THE SAME TO SPECIFIED GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; PROVIDING THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE NOTIFICATION; PROVIDING AND REQUIRING A USER TO NOTIFY THE CITY OF ALL DISCHARGES THAT CAN CAUSE PROBLEMS TO THE POTW; REQUIRING NONCOMPLIANCE REPORTING; REQUIRING ADVANCED NOTIFICATION OF ANY SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN THE VOLUME OR CHARACTER OF POLLUTANTS OF USER DISCHARGES; REQUIRING A USER NOT REQUIRED TO OBTAIN WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE REPORTS; REQUIRING A USER SUBJECT TO REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, TO RETAIN AND MAKE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AND COPYING CERTAIN RECORDS AND INFORMATION HEREIN SPECIFIED AND PROVIDING THE TIME PERIOD WITHIN WHICH THOSE RECORDS ARE TO BE KEPT; PROVIDING MINIMUM SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS FOR A USER; PROVIDING A METHOD BY WHICH A POLLUTANT ANALYSIS IS CONDUCTED; PROVIDING FOR THE CITY MONITORING OF A USER'S WASTEWATER; PROVIDING FOR THE ENTRANCE AND INSPECTION OF FACILITIES OF A USER FOR PURPOSES OF THE ENDORSEMENT OF THE ORDINANCE AND TO INSURE COMPLIANCE Page 164 Book 34 Page 165 WIT THE REQUIREMENTS THEREOF; THAT 15, USER PROVIDE AND OPERATE AT THE OWN 'EXPENSE, MONITOR11\TG FACILITIES FOR THE INSPECTION SiC_M=NG P. F LOW MEASUREMENTS OF SEWER DISCHARGE; PROVIDING FOR lkti APPLICATION FOR SEARCH WARRANTS 7 - 7 7ON PRO':3ABLE CAJSE IN THE EVENT OF VIOLATION OF PRO_,4IPITT­\G THE BREAKING, DAMAGING, DESTROYING, DEFACING, TAMPERING, ETC. , OF ANY STRUCTURE, APPURTENANCE C,!,--. EQUTPM_-.-.�7T OF POTW; PROVIDING A PROCEDURE FOB REQUI OF CONFIDENTIALITY 07 REPORTS, SURVEYS, WASTEWATER DISCHARGE P=RLITT APPLICATIONS WASTE',.?1TER D PERMIT'S AND MONI'T'ORING PROGRAMS AND I:q GAINED FROM CITY 1NSPEC AND SAMPLING ACTIVI'_6i.­ES WHEN' T)IVULGE\CE WOULD PROVIDE INFORMATION ASOUT PROCESSES OR ME7T7ODS 07 PR0DUCT10J.'J TO PROTECT TRADE SECRETS UNDER APP.L, 7 CABLE STATE AND FEDERAL L72.I7; REQUIRING THE PUBLICATION ANl �T LY IN T OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER Ot THE CITY FOR A SPEC1917 PERIOD FOR SIGNIFICANT NCN-CCj✓]DT PROV IDING THE" I _jIANCE 'D�ID " D DEFINITION OF SUCH NON-COMPLIANCE; PROVIDING FOR AD' EX'FORCEMENT REMEDIES; PROVIDTN� FOR NOTIFICATION OF VIOLATION, CONSENT ORDERS AND ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE; PROVIDING FOR TFE ISSUATIFTCE OF COMPLIANCE ORDERS UPON FINDING A USER TO BE CONTiN_ - T OUSLY r7CLATING _ 7 7 L� IS ORD 7 PROVIDING FOR A CEASE AND DESIS' ORDERS AND ADMINISTRATIVE FINES; PROVI TOR EMERGENCY SUSPENS AND TERMINATION OF DISCHARGE IN NON - EMERGENCY SITUA'__­ONS; PROVIDING AN APPELI-ATE PROCESS FOR ' DISCHARGE APPEALS, PROVIDING FOR JUDICIAL ENFORCEMENT. REMEDIES, INCLUDING INJUNCTION RELIEF, CIVIL A]NED CRIMINAL PROSECUTION; PROVIDING THAT A VIOLATION OF THE ORDINANCE IS A MISDEMEANOR; PROVIDT',NTG FOR A PUNISF_._1YENT INCLUDING FINE AND IMPRISONMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE NON--PXCLUSI­TTY OF REMEDIES ELECTED; PROVIDING FOR A E_ ENIIO?R ACTION, INCLUDING PERFORMANCE REQUIRING PROOF OF SUBMISSION OF FI],\1A`TCIAL AS ST - ,T_�,,NCE; PROVIDING THAT WATER SEP, MAY BE SEVERED FOR NONCOMPLIANCE; PROVIDING AND DEFINING T_H:.�- 17ONCOMPLIANCE IS A P U B LIC - L 17 N PROVIDING FOR 3 A-FIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO ,DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS; DEFINING TERMS OF UPSET AND PROVIDING THAI' UPSET IS AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE; PROVIDING A PROCEDURE TO ESTABLISH A.7FIRMATIVE DEFENSE'S, PROVIDING A BURDEN OF PROOF, PROVIDING FOR OPPORTUNI FOR JUDICIAL DETERMINATION; - ?ROVIDIING, FOR A D.1 OF BYPASS SEVERE PROPERTY DAMAGE; PROVIDING 7 IDING 1 3 7 FOR AND REGULATION BYPASS, SPECIFYING ADVANCED NOTICE; PROVIDING A Si3VERABILITY CL.�YUJSE; REPEALING CONFLICTINTIG ORDINAI\ ; PROVIDING FOR A PROCESS OF APPE2',11 OF THE =CISION OF pUDr,,TC WORKS DI RECTOR; PROVIDING FOP THE APP1_1ICATICN OF TT CONTESTED HEARING PROCEDURE 07 THE ORDNANCE 1'0 THE ADMINISTRATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERARILITY AND CONFLICTS OF PROVISIONS CLAUSE; - PROVIDING FOR THE ORDINANCE TO TAKE FULL FORCE, ;,'YD EFFECT AFTER : THE PASSAGE, A'PROVAL AND PUBLICATION. MOV"7D by Raymond, SECONDED by Carpenter tli.at this be consi.12red the second reading of Bill No. 22. R -) 11 ___ Raymond, Ozuna, ca� __ vote. Those voting yes: S.i.min.•ons, Carpenter, and Houchins. Those voting, no: none. Absent and nc'.- voting: Nancolas. MOTTO7L CARR I,ED (SECOND PREADING OF BILL NO. 24 - AMEND CITY CODE REGARDING OPEN CONTAINE,R) aycr Da.� read Bill -No, 24 by title only as follows: AN ORDINANCE 77PEALING CHAPTER 12, TITLE IX, SECTION I THROUGH 3 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF sE CITY 07 CALD ; AD=. A NE , ,1 CHAPTER 12, TITLE IX, S7CTICNS 1 THROUGH 6, PROVIDING FOR Book 34 Page 166 THE PROHIBITION OF THE POSSESSION OF AN OPEN CONTAINER OF ALCOHOL OR CONSUMPTION OF ANY ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ON OR UPON ANY STREET, IN ANY PUBLIC PARKING LOT, IN OR UPON ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE MOTOR VEHICLE OR UPON ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. The Mayor declared this to be the second reading of Bill No. 24. (RIGHT OF WAY DEED AND UTILITY EASEMENT) Mayor Dakan informed Council that this item was acceptance of a right of way deed for a portion of the west half of Kimball Avenue and a utility easement from John Ashman. The deed and easement were a condition of a variance granted to Mr. Ashman for a parcel of land having less than the minimum 60 feet of frontage on public right of way. The City Engineer explained that this was in conjunction with obtaining a building permit.. MOVED by Carpenter, SECONDED by Houchins to accept the right of way deed and utility easement. Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Carpenter, Houchins, Raymond, Ozuna, and Simmons. Those voting no: none. Absent and not voting: Nancolas. MOTION CARRIED (DISCUSSION ON A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) At the request of the Mayor, the Planning and Zoning Director informed Council that recently the Canyon County Planning and Zoning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to allow a vehicle and truck repair shop on property just north of the Boise River and the Caldwell Greenbelt. The City Planning and Zoning Department did respond in writing to the County and expressed some concerns about the potential for impact on the Centennial Park along the Boise River Greenbelt and on the safety of the individuals who use the facilities. The main issue of concern was the question of appropriate access to this property. The truck traffic would have to go through Chicago Street extended through the park and make the turn in the loop along that curvilinear roadway which parallels the Greenbelt and the pathway system. The County Commission did approve the Conditional Use Permit and is contingent upon a zone change from Agricultural to C -3 and also an amendment to the! County's Agricultural designation on the Comprehensive Plan to Commercial. Mr. Crooks stated that he was asking the Council for some direction as to whether the City should contest the action taken by their Planning and Zoning Commission by filing a formal appeal of the Conditional Use Permit. Councilman Raymond asked the Director what the time frame was in making the decision as to whether to contest this ruling by the County. Mr. Crooks said that it was his understanding that the City must file the appeal of the Permit by the end of the week. After further clarification, it was MOVED by Raymond, SECONDED by Carpenter that the Staff be directed to pursue the appeal process regarding the Conditional Use Permit. Book 34 Roll call vote. Those vcti_ig yes: Raymond, Ozuna, Simmons, Carpenter, Houchins. Those voting no: none. Absent and not voting: Nancolas. MOTIC;N CARRIED (BID V4ARD FOR ARTHTOR /MAIN SE-KER REP'ITLACEMEN'i ) Page 167 The City Engineer, Grordon Law, presented tL.e backg:ecund information on this item. Mr. Law stated tha,: on August 3, 1993, bids were rece9.ved for the rE-;ia.acemera of a 6 sewer ma.i.n in an alley bounded bDy':Arthur a,�d Main Streets '_ cm 13th i venue to 18th Avenue. Tt,e Engineer's est_?_mate for -he project is $74,230. Funds dedicated from 92/93 budget were $50,000. Brown's Construction Co. was the only proposal submitted which was -in the amount of x71,3_96. The Engineering Department carefully D sviewed the bidder's proposal and compa it to previous projects of a similar nature. Mr. 7m,aw furt:ier infc.cmed Counci__._ that it was his reco ,- ,=datiol that the bid be awarded to Brown Construction. MOVED by rclachins, SECONDED by Ozuna to accept the bid in the amount of $71,396 submit:tsd by Brown Co ,struction. Roll ca11 vote. Those voting yes: Houchins, Raymond, C una, Simmons, and Carpenter. Those vot..ng no: none. Absent and not voting: Nancolas. MOTION CARR77D (PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 93 -3) The C,'_ty Engineer, at the request of the Mayor, stared that "�:,e proce.aure would be to open the Public :Nearing. 77here w_17 no one signed to testify at this time. The naxt step would be for the City Council to ratify the Resc].ution of Intention and finally, to pass the Ordin: - ace creating tl,e Local Improvement District, Tl,is District was to pave a portion of Larch, Tl]_ .nois aTd Rice. T11is was by petition of the residents on those streets. Mr. Law also requested that since t was getting late in the year, it would be appropr:i..ate for the City Council to consider waiving the rule requLring t tat a Bill.. Le read at three separate times and approve the .'�- 11 a = 2 i s time. Mayo Dakan opened the Public Hearing and since there , spas no one asking to testify, the Public Hearing was closed.. MOVED by Ozuna, SECONDED by Houchins to ratify the Resclution of Intention fc.r Local. Improvement District 93 R.o11 C a 1 1 vote. Those voting yes: Ozuna, Simmons, Carpenter, Houchins, and Raymond. Those voting no: ncr- . Absc­i.t and ;,ot voting: Nancolas. MOTION CARRIED (CONSIDERATION OF BIT;-. NO. 2 - CF.E.ATION OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 93 -3) Mayor Dakan read Bill. 1ao. 25 by title only as :- ollows: AN 0RDINANCFs CREATING LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. .93 -3 OF THE CITY OF CALDWELL, IDAHO; DESCRIBING AND SETTING FORTH THE DOUNDARIES OF SAID DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE 1V,'_? 'OVEMENTS TO BE MADE THER APPOINTING AN ENGINEER; AUTHORIZING THE ADVERTISING FOR BIDS FOR SA7:D WORK PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT Book 34 OF COSTS AND EXPENSES OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE DISTRICT BENEFITED THEREBY AND THE METHOD OF ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BONDS AND WARRANTS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. MOVED by Houchins, SECONDED by Raymond to waive the rule requiring that a Bill be read at three separate times and that Bill No. 25 be read by title for the one reading. Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Houchins, Raymond, Ozuna, Simmons, and Carpenter. Those voting no: none. Absent and not voting: Nancolas. MOTION CARRIED MOVED by Houchins, SECONDED by Raymond that Bill No. 25 be passed after the one reading by title only and be entitled Ordinance No. 1999. Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Houchins, Raymond, Ozuna, Simmons, and Carpenter. Those voting no: none. Absent and not voting: Nancolas. MOTION CARRIED Councilman Houchins commented that it was great to start seeing some of this work done in improving the gravel streets in Caldwell. It has been talked about it for some time and it was gratifying to see the response from the neighborhoods involved. Page 168 (ADOPT THE TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR, 1993 -94, AND SET THE PUBLIC HEARING) The Mayor informed Council that the next item on the Agenda was consideration of the Tentative Budget for the coming year. Councilwoman Carpenter, Chairman of the Finance Committee, explained that both the Council and Staff have been working on the budget for the coming year for the past three or four months. According to State Law, the Tentative Budget must be adopted at this time and the date of the Public Hearing scheduled. The following notice sets the official budget hearing for the night of September 7th. Additionally, a notice was also published asking for public input on August 30th as well. The Notice of Public Hearing and the Tentative Budget for the Fiscal Year 1993 -94 was presented as follows: Notice is hereby given that the city Council of the City of Caldwell, Idaho, will hold a Public Hearing for consideration of the proposed budget for the fiscal period October 1, 1993 - September 30, 1994, pursuant to -- the provisions of Section 50 -1002, I.C., said Hearing to be held at City Hall, Canyon County, Idaho, at 7:30 p.m. on September 7, 1993. At said Hearing, all interested persons may appear and show cause if they have any reason why said proposed budget should not be adopted. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES The following is an estimate set forth in said proposed budget of the total proposed expenditures and accruing indebtedness of the City of Caldwell, Idaho, for the fiscal period October 1, 1993 - September 30, 1994. General Fund $ 4,608,421 Book 34 CeTetery 237,6P7 Library 329,040 Street 1,639,201 Airport 274,551 Recreation 332,081 Insurance 576,059 Water C.I. 580,202 Sewer C.I. 0 Cap Impr. Levy 193,998 Water 1,270,150 Se war 1,701,310 Golf 557,380 Sanitation 955,561 Cemetery C.I. 24.,500 Rehab 170,248 Grant Funds 0 Internal Services 7.02,902 Employee Insurance Fund 9;79,256 Street Lighting 13S,S55 Total: $74,340,928 ESTIMATED TREVENUE Revenue From Tax Levy General Fund $ 2,150,000 Street Fund 135,852 Rocreaticn Fund 92 Library Fund 247,630 Liaj.Dility Insurance 121,000 Cap. -'! - nprovem-,-ants 147,000 Cemetery 40,000 Airport 36,387 Subtotal: $ 3,019,909 Franchise $ 135 ,000 State Revenue Sharing 512,750 Highway User's Fund 520,000 County Road/ Bridge Tax 16S,000 Liquor Fund 55 Sales Tax 414,647 Court Revenue 165,500 Licenses and Permits 140,700 Interest 154,000 Grant Funds 287,700 Yiscella7eous 03,7C3 Subtotal; $ 2,647,000 Services and. Fees Plr� and Zoning $ 5,300 Cemetery 122,260 Stres: 2,000 Airpor 62,992 Recreation 192,000 Waler S95,054 Treatment Plant 1,200,000 Gol- 504,350 Sanitanion 930,000 Rural Fire 237,000 Events Center 167,750 General Fund 30,050 InterJepartmental 1,030,331 Cash Carryover 2,711,987 Water C.I. 8s,000 Sewer C.I - 250,000 Cemetery CZ. 6,000 Stree, Lighting 141,600 Page 169 Book 34 Subtotal: $ 8,674,019 Total: $14,340,928 I, Betty Jo Keller, City Clerk of the city of Caldwell, Idaho, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct statement of the proposed expenditures and revenues for fiscal year 1993 -94, all of which have been tentatively approved and entered at length in the Journal _ of Proceedings. I further certify that the City of Caldwell, Idaho, did give notice for said hearing with notice having published twice at least seven days apart prior to the adoption of the budget by the City Council. Citizens are invited to attend the budget hearing on September 7, 1993, at 7:30 p.m. and have the right to provide written or oral comments concerning the entire City budget. A copy of the proposed City Budget in detail is available at City Hall for inspection during regular office hours, 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. MOVED by Carpenter, SECONDED by Ozuna to adopt the Tentative Budget and set the Public Hearing for September 7, 1993. Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Carpenter, Houchins, Raymond, Ozuna, and Simmons. Those voting no: none. Absent and not voting: Nancolas.. MOTION CARRIED (CHANGE THE TIME OF THE NEXT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING) Mayor Dakan explained that the next Regular City Council Meeting was scheduled for the evening of September 6th which is Labor Day. Therefore, he would ask for a motion to change the Regular City Council Meeting date from September 6th to September 7th. MOVED by Houchins, SECONDED by Carpenter that the next Regular City Council Meeting be held on September 7, 1993, rather than the 6th due to the Labor Day Holiday. Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Houchins, Raymond, Ozuna, Simmons, and Carpenter. Those voting no: none. Absent and not voting: Nancolas. MOTION CARRIED (FINANCIAL REPORT) Councilwoman Carpenter reported that the Finance Committee has reviewed and approved current accounts payable in the amount of $253,294.77 and a payroll of $178,306.52 for the period ended August 11, 1993. MOVED by Carpenter, SECONDED by Ozuna that accounts payable in the amount of $253,294.77 represented by checks number 32374 through 32500 and a payroll for the amount of $178,306.52 represented by checks number 44664 through 44877 be accepted, payment approved, and the vouchers filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Carpenter, Houchins, Raymond, Ozuna, and Simmons. Those voting no: none. Absent and not voting: Nancolas. MOTION CARRIED (AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION) The Mayor recognized several Boy Scouts in the audience and welcomed them to the meeting. The Scouts were in Page 170 Book 34 attendance because they were working on their Community Merit Badge_ Mayor. Dakar then asked if there was anyone who ca-red to address the City Council at this tire. Page 171 Ron Taylor, the Corporate Engineer for Darigold, was recognize& and slated that he was here to talk about proposed Dill No. 22 pertaining to reqairement-s for discharge into the Caldwell ',lastewater Treatm.ent Plant. Mr. Taylor distributed copies of the comments he intended to present which are attached to the minutes as Exhibit A. Also attached as Exhibit C is a verbatim transcript of remarks made by Mr- Taylor following his opening statement. Following discussion between the City Council Members, the City Engineer, and Mr. Taylor, Dave Whitney, Attorney for Darigold, was recognized and maws_ his comments - . , . -, '--ich are attached as Exhibit B. The tape of this meeting w-i.il be on file in the Office of the City Clergy for six months. it will be available ior anyone who cares to roview it. After Mr. Whitney's comments, the Mayor stated that what is being talked about is that nhing5 do change- Last year, a0-2r many years of fighting off E.P.A., the City has to chlorinate their water. The water quality in Caliwell hasn't changed in sixty years, but because of Federal Regulations arid higher testing qualities, tl'l-, change. The City has Lo go along with that and that is w!�-at thic7 Pretreatment Ordinance is all about. The ccu-',. have been fin.]-ng us on a daily oasis for the !as two yeaa beca we did not have it ir.. place. The City has bent over -backwards and held off as long as we possibly can. ° =e have extended it about seven or eight. times and they have gone along with us. The correspondence the City received today indicates that their patience has run out. The City is going to be fined and so is Darigold- They are saying that the agreement the City has been going by between the city and Darigold - not legal anyway and they wil-I not recognize it E.P.A. will fine both of us directly. The Pretreatment Ordinance is one that the Government said had tc be in place. It has nothing to do with capacity at all. The City was not trying to punish anyone doing .b -11 town. Darigold has had a good. deal and it is unacrstanda-ble that you would want to fight the req On the other nand, every time !-here is an update in the Treatment Plant, everyone participates except for Danigold because of their agreement. 44 have to deal with what is happening today; not what happened twenty years ago. Mayor Dakan further stated that he thought both sides were working to get this situation worked out. The City is trying to be as fair as ,)ossihle. and stay within the confines of whaL, the E.P.A. is ma-,datinq. We do not want Dariqo!6 to leave the City as they have been an important part of this community for many years. After further discussing this issue, the Mayor asked if there was anyone else who cared to address the City Council at this time. Gene Eneso was recognized by - ttLe Mayor stating that he was spearing on hehalf of the employees. Their request was that the City Council. reconsider the possibility of el-i ' free golf passes for the City employees. A letter was haing prepared to the Mayor and City Council Members the employee's concerns. (COMMITTZE REPORTS) Book 34 Councilman Ozuna reported that he attended a Canyon County Coalition on Crime Meeting last week. They have made a contribution of $5,000 to the County Sheriff's Office for lab photo equipment and have also committed $3,500 to Caldwell Police Department for a polygraph machine. Mr. Ozuna also stated that he helped out with the Buckaroo Breakfast on Saturday. (MAYOR'S COMMENTS) Mayor Dakan reminded Council of the ribbon cutting for the new Payless Drug Store at 8:00 a.m. on Wednesday. He also commented that the Rodeo was this week and promised to be a good show as usual. (ADJOURNMENT) MOVED by Carpenter, SECONDED by Raymond that since there was no further business, the Meeting be adjourned at 9:00 p.m. MOTION CARRIED Page 172 APPROVED AS written THIS 7th DAY OF Sept. 1993. C cil on Co,�{r�cilp tson ' uounciipers ATTEST: