Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-06-19city council minutesBook 25 REGULAR MEETING June 19, 19134 7:30 p.m. The Meeting was called to order by Mayor McCluskey. Page 128 The Mayor requested that everyone stand and give the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. The Roll of the City Council was called with the following members present: Carter Mallea, Marcus, Cowles, Raymond, and Norman. Absent: none. (APPROVAL OF MINUTES) The Mayor requested action on the minutes from the last two City Council Meetings. Councilwoman Marcus asked that a correction be made on Page 127 under Committee reports, the third sentence from the bottom, where it stated that Councilwoman Mallea attended the Crimestoppers. It should read Councilwoman Marcus. The Clerk noted the correction. MOVED by Cowles, SECONDED by Raymond that the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of June 5, 1984, be approved as written, and that the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of June 12, 1984, be approved as corrected. MOTION CARRIED (AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION) The Mayor asked if there was anyone from the audience who cared to bring anything before the City Council that was not on the prepared Agenda. As there was no one, the Mayor declared that the Meeting would continue as outlined. (REQUEST FOR AN EXECUTIVE SESSION) The Mayor stated that due to circumstances with regard to the possibility of a legal question pertaining to several items on the Agenda, he would request a motion from a member of the City Council to convene into an Executive Session for about eight minutes. MOVED by Mallea, SECONDED by Norman that the City.Council convene into an Executive Session pursuant to the Idaho State Code, Section 67 -2343, for the purpose of discussing possible legal complications. Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Mallea, Marcus, Cowles, Raymond, Norman, and Carter. Those voting no: none. Absent and not voting: none. MOTION CARRIED The City Council then recessed into the Executive Session at 7:35 p.m. and the Regular City Council Meeting was reconvened at 7:48 P .M. OLD BUSINESS (SET WORK SESSION FOR CHILD CARE LICENSING ORDINANCE) The Mayor stated that the first item on the Agenda was to set a work session with regard to the proposed Child Care Licensing Ordinance. The Mayor said that he would like to have this work session in conjunction with the next City Council Meeting on Tuesday, June 26th at 12:00 Noon. Copies of the revised Bill were distributed to members of the City Council for their study before that meeting. Book 25 Page 129 (SECOND READING OF BILL NO. 12 - AMEND CODE REGARDING FIRE PREVENTION CODE) The Mayor read Bill No. 12 by title only as follows: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE X, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 1, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF CALDWELL, COUNTY OF CANYON, STATE OF IDAHO, BY DELETING AND ADDING CERTAIN LANGUAGE WITH REGARD TO FIRE PREVENTION CODE: REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. The Mayor declared this to be the second reading of Bill No. 12 (REJECT BIDS ON FAIRVIEW GOLF COURSE RESTROOMS) The Mayor read the following memo from Ron Redmond, the City Engineer: on June 1st, the City opened bids for the Fairview Golf Course Restrooms. We received six bids on the project. Unfortunately all bids were above the funds available and additional money could not be obtained. Therefore, it's appropriate that all bids be rejected and the bidders thanked for their bids. The project should be rescheduled and rebudgeted for next year. MOVED by Marcus, SECONDED by Norman that the all bids for the Fairview Golf Course Restrooms be rejected as recommended by the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED NEW BUSINESS (PUBLIC HEARING ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE FROM MEDIUM TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ON TEN ACRES AT SOUTH FLORIDA, CHERRY AND BEECH) The Mayor explained that there was three Public Hearings scheduled for this Meeting. An official notification was received about 5:00 p.m. that afternoon in City Hall addressed to the Caldwell Planning and Zoning Chairman that those people whose signatures appeared on the document were declaring that one member of the Planning and Zoning Commission had a conflict of interest in the matter that was to be brought before the City Council tonight. Therefore, they felt that her vote when the issue was brought before the Commission was null and void. The Mayor read the notification for the benefit of those in the audience and the City Council. A. copy of this document is attached to these minutes. The Mayor stated that he had planned to call the public hearings off due to this challenge to the Planning and Zoning Commission and subsequently turning the matter over to the City Attorney for his determination of the legality of this notification. The City Council felt that it was to the best interest of those in attendance at the meeting to proceed with the Public Hearings. The Mayor then explained to the audience that in order to speak with regard to the public hearing, it would be necessary to sign the sheet that would be passed around the room. The rules and instructions for the public hearing as established by the State of Idaho were then read for their benefit. The Mayor then requested that the City Clerk circulate around the Council Chambers to secure the names of those who cared to speak either pro or con. It was then MOVED by Raymond, SECONDED by Norman that a three minute time limit be established for those who care to speak with the exception of the spokesman, who would be allowed a longer time within reason. MOTION CARRIED Book 25 Page 130 The Mayor then opened the Public Hearing for a comprehensive plan change from medium to high density residential on ten acres at South Florida, Cherry and Beech. The Mayor then recognized William J. Van Sickle, who was the spokesman for the homeowners in the area under discussion. Mr. Van Sickle stated that he lived at 3405 Starlight. He presented three letters from homeowners in the area who were in opposition to the Plan Change. Mr. Van Sickle further said that the issue was not to develop the land, the issue was what kind of development. As a homeowner in the area, he put money down for his house and was informed that the land was going to be a retirement center and be a buffer between the R -3, C -3, M -1 to the R -2 which would make a good place to live. The right of the developer to change his mind is fine as long as a high standard is maintained. A mobile home park is going down hill and not maintaining the standard. Let's look at the area around in question; to the north side of Cherry Street from East to West to Cleveland is designated C -3, serviced Commercial and M -1 Light Industrial. Going to the Nest, R -3 for Mobile Home Park that is not yet developed. This borders a mobile home park in existence. West of the ten acres was undeveloped for the most part and is zoned R -2. To the East, South Florida is minor arterial to feed traffic into Cleveland; a State Highway. The corner of Cleveland and South Florida is a downhill slope and 'aces over in the winter and it is just about impossible to stop. There is no traffic control from Tenth Street in downtown Caldwell to Midland Road at this time. South of Beech is Starlight Park 1 and 2. Park 1 is R -2 single family residence with the exception of Florida which allows duplexes. This Park consists of homes that Caldwell can be proud of. Starlight 2 is also zoned R -2 with modular homes. The first home built was very nice, but the third home shows less quality of construction. It was felt that a few members of the Planning and Zoning Commission knew what the outcome of the meeting was going to be before the Meeting was called to order. In recommendations to the City Council, the Planning and Zoning Commission did not answer the following questions: The traffic control at the corner of Cleveland and Florida. This corner is at a triangle of City, County, and State. No impact study has been completed that we know of and it is hard to turn into Cleveland at different times of the day. Irrigation plans call for City water. At this time, Starlight Park homeowners using City water for irrigation drops the water pressure in Starlight Park. There is a ten inch water line on South Florida that feeds all of this area. I do not feel that with this addition of 67 more units there will be enough water to irrigate the landscapes. Sewer; no impact was done on this. The service was to serve 30 acres zoned R -2 and not a mobile hone park plus twenty acres of R -2. The Planning and Zoning Commission on granting the Special Use Permit should have attached some of the including; minimize adverse effects on other developments, none was done. Controlling the sequence and the duration of use permit, none was done. Insuring that the development is maintained properly, designating the location and nature of the development including signs; about half was done. Requiring the provisions for onsight and offsight public facilities. This was on the plans. Requiring more restrictive standards than generally required in the ordinance. Some; what they did set was half of Cherry Street along with Florida Avenue to be improved. This will leave one half of Cherry Street curbed. Landscaping plans to be prepared and reviewed by staff. Who is staff? No clarifaction was made. Landscaping plan is to include eight foot strip between fence and curb on Beech Street. Mobile home parks in Caldwell have shown in the past that they will not keep the landscaping up. - -- Irrigation plan is to be approved by Pioneer Irrigation for sprinkling. Pioneer Irrigation will be happy to approve when they are irrigating sixty -seven new accounts without outlay of water. Limitation of sixty -seven units was on the plan. The Park is to remain an adult only Park. What if the Courts say that it is illegal for adults only to be designated in the Park. What will be put in its place? Sewer stipulation as approved as imposed by the Engineering be met - at this time only part is Book 25 Page 131 being used so it would be a good system. It appears not to be considered as to what is best for the community in general, but just for the ten acres site in question. At the Planning and Zoning Meeting, there was one person for the change and he worked for the developer. Sixteen people in opposition and several that did not put their names as against. Planning and Zoning did not listen to the men and women who live in the area. The duties of the Commission is to insure public, safety, welfare or injuries to other property owners. In this area, the addition of sixty -seven mobile homes on ten acres we feel would have an impact of cars detrimental to public health. The sidewalk and curbs in this area are one and the same. Safety; crime in a high density with low police coverage. It is really hard to have proper coverage in that area. The welfare; consider this area of town being developed as a low income housing. We feel that the property values will decline with a mobile home park with no buffer around us to insure the property owners in the area. Mobile home park is not going to sell the spaces, but will rent them which will make it transient in nature. Barbara Pollard should have been disqualified under Idaho Code, Paragraph 67 -6505, an addition by 1974, Chapter 188, paragraph 2, of conflict of interest. She works for Golden West Realty, Inc. Golden West Realtor handles the property sales for Gary Lasher the owner of the ten acres. Golden West Realtor has financial obligation to Mr. Lasher to protect his interests. Mrs. Pollard is incorporated with Golden West Realtor and is in part ownership therein. In summary, Barbara Pollard should be disqualified. We feel the zoning change should be denied for the following reasons: the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission is in contrary to public interest. The decision would result in unnecessary hardship because of the characteristics of the site. No studies were made of the social, economic, financial, or environmental impact of this proposed use. Loss of property value would occur. No insurance has been given that the development would be properly maintained. Planning and Zoning change always will go down hill when you change from R -2 to R -3; it will never get back to an R -2 and will keep going down. others that either added comments to Mr. Van Sickle's testimony or stated that they were in agreement: William Hurst, 2804 Beech; Cindy Kawano, 2812 Beech; Reverend Jack Cooke, 2811 Twilight; Steve Bonde, 3411 Starlight; William Moylan, 3412 Starlight; Joan Williams, 3421 Starlight; Joe Weitzer, 2770 Polaris; Martha Kawaguchi, 2716 Polaris; Maria Gonzales, 3424 Starlight; Everett Jones, 2812 Twilight; Larry Shearin; 2805 Twilight.. Jeri Hanks, 409 West Ash, was recognized by the Mayor and stated that she did sympathize with their problems and concerns. She did not live in the area under discussion, but she was present at the meeting to make a comment. She was a senior citizen and they had been out shopping that day for a mobile home in an adult mobile home park. As they were looking, they thought how lovely it would be if this proposed park would go in and by law, become a nice park to live in such as the ones they had looked at today in Meridian and Boise. There just was not such a park in the City of Caldwell. A lot of people that she has known have moved to Boise or Meridian in order to reside in one of these mobile home parks. In the parks they visited, they were the only vehicle moving and there was no traffic problems. There was nothing but peace, quiet, contentment,and etc. Mike Barrett of Earl Surveying and Associates was recognized. Mr. Barrett stated that they were representing T and D Partnership from a technical standpoint on this project. They were seeking a Comprehensive Plan Change and Zone Change to support an adult trailer park. It was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission where approval was given for all three issues. The special Use Permit was approved with several conditions which have been agreed to. Mr. Barrett further said that it was not a true statement that the sewer would be over loaded. The sewer was designed to handle the twenty -four acres Book 25 Page 1.32 South of this development plus up to ninety units in this ten acres which is the allowable density in R -2 zoning. The Comprehensive Plan Change and Zone change were both reasonable requests in light of the existing trailer park to the Northwest, the existing trailer zoning due North and the Commercial to the Northeast. The proposed project has less density than is presently allowed in an R -2 Zone. This zone also allows manufactured housing without the visual restrictions placed on a mobile home park. Rod Trumbull, 4524 East Cleveland, was recognized and stated that the first thing he would like to say was that Barbara Pollard was not involved in any of the financial dealings of this project. It was between Mr. Lasher of Lasher Construction and T and D Partnership. The only ones involved with anything to do with the financing at all is Lasher Construction and T and D Partnership. He was very sorry that she was involved in this problem at all; he felt that she voted in her own good conscience, had no financial gains in this at all. Mr. Trumbull further said that he had never met Mrs. Hanks, but he felt she was right in her comments. Mr. Trumbull then handed out some brochures showing Midway Park that was just recently build. After taking a real, good, hard look at what was going on in the house building industry, he arrived at the conclusion that the industry was changing. He felt that those in objection to the project were mak'ing a mistake as there was going to be more and more of these kinds of projects. At least thirty percent of the homes now are manufactured homes. Mr. Trumbull explained at some length the plans that were being made for this park under discussion and stated that unfortunately, a lot of those in this room tonight would not qualify to go into one of the manufactured housing developments. They were controlled by various rules and regulations such as only adults, no dogs over a certain size, and etc. He did not believe that older folks would cause an increase in crime, particularly with the traffic problem. Mr. Trumbull said that overall he felt the project was feasible and would be a good asset: to Caldwell. It was not dividing the ground and was a special, use permit which could eventually be changed if something else was dictated for it. The type of housing that is out and the rules that are established with them involve wood siding, composition roof; this was under Midway and for this proposed development, the rules would probably be more stringent. There was a demand for this type of housing as a lot of people would like to get into a secured area. Mr. Trumbull also said he had brochures from U.S., Homes out of Salt Lake which he happened to handle. They were nice homes and many were more expensive that those existing now. It was not trailer houses anymore. Some day their children are going to want housing and the cost will be too much for them to rent or build. As a builder, he was certain there was going to be more and more manufactured housing. The rules established in these parks were a lot more rigid than what City ordinances demand. The Mayor informed Mr. Trumbull that. he w-Zs some confused with the nature of the project. The talk was centered around mobile homes and then all of a sudden we are talking about manufactured housing. Was it Mr. Trumbull's intent to put the same type of construction on this site as was being done at Midway. Mr. Trumbull said yes, it was. The restrictions at Midway are wood siding and that's all they are. They are two by four, two by six walls. The Mayor further said he was acquainted with the manufactured housing, but he thought they were talking about mobile homes which was a thirty by whatever - he was not talking about this kind of housing? Mr. Trumbull said no, the whole industry has changed. The restrictions on this would be wood siding and he had twelve units at Midway, interviewed a hundred people, and would imagine one or two were looking for single wider which would be restrictive. The Mayor asked Mr. Trumbull to give him the consideration of having some knowledge of the Book 25 Page 133 industry - this is not a mobile home? It is a manufactured housing unit. Mr. Trumbull further said that they were one and the same anymore. Councilman Carter asked if all of the units would have pitched roofs rather than rounded or flat? Mr. Trumbull said that he did not have any inventory out there other than wood and peaked roofs. Councilman Raymond asked if the basic question was whether the unit Mr. Trumbull plans to put in meet the manufactured housing ordinance today. Mr. Trumbull stated that all double wides, as it stands right now, could be put on a foundation and there would be no question here tonight. He would like a higher density and he would like to keep control. Councilman Carter further said that to clarify Councilman Raymond's question, our mobile home ordinance specifies that it cannot be any narrower than twenty feet at the narrowest portion, Mr. Trumbull is putting fourteen .foot wide in which would not meet the manufactured home specifications. Councilwoman Mallea said that Mr. Trumbull's last remark was that he would like to have greater density to keep control. Are you saying that while you might put on double wiles, you also might put a fourteen foot at your discretion. Mr. Trumbull said that there was very nice fourteen wider out and he had every intention of using the same park rules as those in existence at Midway. Councilwoman Mallea stated that she did not believe he answered her question - are you reserving the right to put any width between fourteen and whatever you wish. Mr. Trumbull answered yes, minimum footage. Several more people were recognized for comments; Steve Willmorth, 2622 Cherry; John Bevan, 4525 East Cleveland; and Pete Hamon, 115 West Logan. -- Mr. Bevan informed the Council that he was not a resident of Caldwell. He worked for a manufactured housing manufacturer out of Salt Lake and was just at the meeting by chance. He felt that the City Council was acting not only in behalf of the people here tonight, but also on behalf of the whole City. Their decision would have to be decided on that basis and not on the majority of the people in the room. Manufacturing Housing is not inferior to what they were living in; it is a type of housing that individuals can afford. Mr. Bevan felt there was some reverse discrimination here in that people don't want to allow people in the community to have this type of housing when they can't afford anything else. Those types of people living in manufactured housing would be individuals such as Mrs. Hanks and he would not mind having her for a next door neighbor. Cities in the surrounding area have really nice parks and he would challenge anyone to go to Mr. Trumbull's place of business to see what kind of housing would be put in this park. They were beautiful homes and something to be proud of in a community. The Mayor then stated he would open the discussion for the City Council to direct questions or make a statement. Councilman Carter said that he would like -to comment on the area in particular that was under discussion. In an area measured one half mile by one half mile square, there was three mobile home parks and four multiple dwelling units. Also, there is about a five acre parcel that is situated between two of the apartment complexes that in his thinking, the only development that will go in there is additional town houses or apartment buildings. Also, just East of the one mobile home park on the corner of Cherry and Georgia there is land that has been zoned for mobile homes. It seemed to him that they were loading up one area of town with high density development. Councilman Raymond answered that he did not like to see density discussed in this particular consideration. The area is presently zoned R -2; the man has the property and can put in R -2 housing in there at the present time with the density it brings Book 25 Page 134 about without ever coming to this body or to Planning and Zoning. what he has heard discussed tonight is a development that will be less than the maximum allows under R -2 zoning. The only reason everyone is here tonight is because it is a different type of housing. Density is not the factor as the density has been provided for in the zoning that exists today. There was further discussion among the Council members and the audience. It was then MOVED by Mal-lea, SECONDED by Cowles that the Public Hearing be closed. Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Malleajn, Marcus, Cowles, Raymond, Norman, and Carter. Those: voting no: none. Absent and not voting: none. MOTION CARRIED Councilman Raymond commented that he would like to point out that public hearings were not a vote of popularity. There was a decision to be made and the Council took this responsibility very seriously as did the Planning and Zoning Commission. what is best for the community was the main concern. Under discussion was ten acres that was waiting to be developed and designated as future residential development under R -2 zoning. There could be much worse happen out there than a manufactured housing development. Councilman Raymond further said that if there was restrictions established here that it could become very compatible to the neighborhood. The realities are that it takes wide open, bare ground for this type of development. If you go further out, there is no sewer and water available. With regard to costs of housing; there is just not housing available such as it was some years back. Regarding the protection of a previous sales agreement as to what might go in that neighborhood, that is riot an obligation of the Council. If some agreement was made with a sales agent as to what development may be made in the future, that is a problem for the Courts. Councilman Raymond felt that the traffic problem caused by a mobile home park would be less than many other uses that might go into R -2. Sixty -seven units would be less density that would be allowed under present _. zoning by some other method. There was a potential for some low income housing. Councilman Cowles asked the audience if they were aware that this was what the homes were going to look like? (referring to a picture of the Midway development) One member of the audience commented that Mr. Trumbull just said that this was not what they were going to look like. Councilman Cowles then asked why they were looking at it at all. Mr. Trumbull said that this was the type of homes that would be there. Councilman Cowles stated that the people have no idea just what type of housing will be out there. Mr. Trumbull further said that he had City Ordinances that he had to abide by and he was hoping that he would have more copies of typical park rules other than the ones from Midway Park. The rules would be very similar. Councilman Cowles stated that he understood that the development under consideration was to have mobile homes that would be driven in and if they don't meet specifications, would be pulled out. Mr. Trumbull stated that he would :invite anybody out to Midway Park; the brochures were with regard to that Park. They just finished putting down oil on the streets. Councilman Cowles further said that he did not feel his question was answered as yet. Mr. Trumbull stated that this was the type of housing that was going in there; the picture on the Midway Park brochure. - Councilman Carter said that he would have to question this. with Mr. Trumbull's manufactured homes specifications, he says it can be as small as fourteen wide. That to him was a mobile home. A manufactured home could be moved in on wheels, but sits on a permanent foundation. Mrs. Robison commented that the fourteen Book 25 Page 135 wide would be the double wide type, but she did think that the manufactured homes have the twenty foot minimum. The foundations would not be permanent in the project under discussion. Councilman Cowles stated that he did not think the homeowners in the area were opposed to future development. Just what kind of development did they want? Pat Moylan was recognized and stated that the developer has already put manufactured housing behind her home and they are not kept up. It was promised that they would be landscaped. Her experience was that they were deceitful and she did not think any covenants proposed would be upheld. Mr. Bonde further said that they were not opposed to development as they were originally told that they were going to put basically high density permanent retirement homes. This was fine and caused no problem. They were against trailer houses moving in and out and how the area would look in the future. The Mayor again questioned Mr. Trumbull as to what kind of housing would be included in this project. Were the houses to be brought in on wheels, taken off the wheels, put on a temporary foundation? was this right? Mr. Trumbull answered yes. The Mayor continued - They will be anywhere from 14 foot wide up to 28 foot wide or even larger. The particular picture he had was a manufactured house. Was it done in the manner just stated? Mr. Trumbull stated that it was. The Mayor then asked if siding was put on to make it look like one unit. Mr. Trumbull - Right. The Mayor further stated that this does not fit in a R -2 zone - is that right? Mr. Trumbull stated it would if -- he subdivided the ground, put them on a foundation, then it would fit. Mr. Trumbull further said he did not want to do this as he wanted to put in a public area, wanted to keep it as a rental, putting a foundation down was considerably more money, subdividing was also more money, and you also lose control. After some further discussion, the Mayor asked the City Council to take action on the issue of the coprehensive plan change from medium to high density residential on the ten acres at South Florida, Cherry and Beech. A tape of the entire proceedings is available in the Office of the City Clerk and will be retained for the period of time as stipulated by State Law. MOVED by Raymond that the Comprehensive Plan be changed from Medium to High Density Residential on ten acres at South Florida, Cherry and Beech. Councilman Carter stated that he would SECOND the motion to bring the question to the table. Not necessarily indicating that he was in favor or not in favor of the change. The Mayor asked for a roll call vote. Those voting yes: Raymond. Those voting no: Norman, Carter, Mallea, Marcus, and Cowles. Absent and not voting: none. MOTION DENIED The Mayor stated that the motion was denied so there would be need to continue with the next two Public Hearings on the Agenda. (FINANCIAL REPORT) Councilwoman Mallea reported that the Finance Committee met to go over the Requests for Payment. The Accounts Payable were in the amount of $350,890.80; the amount of the Payroll was $210,479.53 of which $48,123.10 was fringe benefits. This made a total Requests for Payment of $561,369.61. MOVED by Mallea, SECONDED by Norman that the checks be issued and the Requests for Payment filed in the Office of the City Clerk. MOTION CARRIED (COMMITTEE REPORTS) Book 25 Page 136 Councilwoman Mallea reported that the Budget Committee has finished interviews with the Department Heads. The Finance Clerk is now totalling the proposed budget and work will proceed on the budget after the A.I.C. Convention. Councilman Carter stated that he met with the Senior Citizens the day before and all seemed to be well under control. They are in the process of trying to find another fulltime cook. He did ask members of the Board if they have had any input from the seniors with regard to the Trolley. They indicated that they had very little response for or against the Trolley. The Mayor stated that one of the reasons for this was because they already have their own transportation so there wasn't a great need for the Trolley. Councilman Norman reported that the Golf Courses were going well and that the receipts were up from last year even with the bad weather. Councilman Raymond 'informed the Council that there was a traffic problem on Florida Avenue. He really felt that the City needed to have engineers look at traffic patterns in that area. Both Councilman Cowles and Councilwoman Marcus commented on the success of the first Grand Prix held the last Saturday. (MAYOR'S COMMENTS) The Mayor informed the City Council that there was several major changes to be made in the Lease Agreement with Emery Spangler at the Airport. Councilman Carter explained that when the lease was signed by Mr. Spangler for Precision Flight, he did not indicate that a permanent type structure would be constructed. Therefore, the lease needed to be changed for a longer period of time with the statement that the building will revert to the City of Caldwell at the end of the lease. The Mayor then read the Resolution as follows: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZIING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF CALDWELL TO EXECUTE AN ADDENDUM TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CLADWELL AND PRECISION FLIGHT, INC. BE IT RESOLVED That the Mayor and City. Clerk of the City of Caldwell be,, and the same hereby are, authorized to execute that certain Addendum to Lease Agreement at the Caldwell Industrial Airport attached hereto and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. by and between the City of Caldwell and Precision Flight, Inc. MOVED by Carter, SECONDED by Mallea that Resolution No. 16 -84 be passed authorizing the eN:ecution of the Addendum as stipulated. Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Carter, Mallea, Marcus, Cowles, Raymond, and Norman. Those voting no: none. Absent and not voting: none. MOTION CARRIED There being no further business, the Meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M. written 3rd APPROVED AS July , 1984. y Co I}�i. / >� Counc,11P "Councilperson ATTEST: L/ )AY OF City C1