HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-05-01city council minutesBook 36
REGULAR MEETING
May 1, 1995
7:30 p.m.
The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Winder,
The Mayor requested that everyone stand for the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
Page 100
The Roll of the City Council was called with the
following members present: Nancolas, Langan, Carpenter,
Houchins, Raymond, and Earl. Absent: none.
(ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA)
Mayor Winder asked if there were any additions to the
prepared Agenda.
Councilman Nancolas MO'V'ED and it was SECONDED by Houchins
to include as item No. 6 under the Consent Calendar the
rejection of the bid for the demolition of the Union
Block Building.
Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Nancolas, Langan,
Carpenter, Houchins, Raymond, and Earl. Those voting no:
none. Absent and not voting: none.
MOTION CARRIED
(INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL VISITORS)
The Mayor recognized Mr. Warren, President of the
Caldwell Realtors Board, who was in attendance as their
representative. -
(AUDIENCE PARTICTPATION)
Leo Holmes, 1121 Main Street, was recognized by the Mayor
and thanked all who helped him with the memorial for
Littleton at Pioneer Plaza.
Roger Eisenbarth, 2310 Terrace, was recognized and stated
that he wanted to talk briefly about Bill No. 7 creating
L.I.D. 95 -2, the Terrace Sewer Project.
Before Mr. Eisenbarth continued, the Mayor stated that
the Council has gone through the public hearing process
and everyone was given the opportunity to make a
presentation. At the last meeting, several people were
allowed to speak and some people felt that this might
have influenced some of the decision making of the
Council. However, he did not believe this was the case.
At this time, he would ask the City Attorney for his
judgment.
Mr. Harris stated that once the public meeting was
closed, there should be no further testimony given with
reference to that particular item. There was a procedure
whereby a public meeting can be reopened, but it has to
be reopened with notice to all parties. At this time
where the meeting has been closed and there was no motion
to reopen the hearing to take additional testimony at
this time would be improper.
Mayor Winder further commented that Mr. Eisenbarth has
items that he would like to bring to the AdministratioI' s
attention dealing with specifics such as routing and the
cost of the project which he believed had already been
discussed with the City Engineer.
Book 36
Mr. Law, the City Engineer, stated that the issues as to
whether to form the L.I.D. were not appropriate and
should not be discussed further. However, he did not
believe there was any time too late in the process to
discuss as to efficient use of money or whether the route
was the best one and if people were being taken care of
properly by the proposed designs. He felt those items
were appropriate right up to the time the contractor gets
his last payment.
Mr. Eisenbarth testified before the City Council with
regard to this project. He stated that due to the
excessive cost of the L.I.D., he would like Council to
consider a couple of proposals which would not impact the
continuation of the project. One was to eliminate the
requirement that when a property changes ownership, they
have to hook up to the sewer. The other was to waive the
intercepter fee.
Mayor Winder assured him that these two recommendations
could be considered and the Bill amended as Council goes
through the process.
(DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS)
Darrell Mayes, the Building Official, presented his
report to the Mayor and City Council Members. The report
included the number of permits issued in Caldwell and
other pertinent data with regard to that Department.
Since Chuck Fenton was out of town at this time, Gordon
Law, the City Engineer and Public Works Director,
reported with regard to the Treatment Plant. His report
included the number of people served by the Plant with a
breakdown as to whether they were businesses or
residences. Mr. Law further explained the capacity of
the Plant and other related information such as
anticipated expansions and the impact on the individual
users of the system. He also reviewed issues the Plant
was facing.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The Mayor presented the following items included on the
Consent Calendar for Council consideration:
1. Dispense with the reading of the minutes of the
April 17, 1995, Regular City Council Meeting and approve
as written;
2. Accept the minutes of the Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting of April 20, 1995; Historic
Preservation Commission Meeting of April 13, 1995;
Caldwell Senior Citizen's Center Commission Meeting of
March 21, 1995; Caldwell Public Library Board Meeting of
April 13, 1995;
3. Pass the following Resolution authorizing the
execution of Land Lease Agreement at the Caldwell Airport
with Ralph and Avon Russi:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO EXECUTE A LAND LEASE AGREEMENT FOR
HANGAR CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN CITY OF CALDWELL
AND RALPH AND /OR AVON RUSSI.
BE IT RESOLVED That the Mayor and City
Clerk of the City of Caldwell, be and the same
hereby are, authorized to execute that certain
Land Lease Agreement for hangar construction
attached hereto and made a part hereof as if
set forth in full by and between the City of
Caldwell and Ralph and /or Avon Russi.
Pass the following Resolution authorizing the
execution of Land Lease Agreement at the Caldwell Airport
with Edward J. Shetler:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO EXECUTE A LAND LEASE AGREEMENT FOR
Page 101
Book 36
Pape 102
HANGAR CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN CITY OF CALDWELL
AND EDWARD J. SHETLER.
BE IT RESOLVED That the Mayor and City
Clerk of the City of Caldwell, be and the same
hereby are, authorized to execute that certain
Land Lease Agreement for hangar construction
attached hereto and made a part hereof as if
set fortis in full. by and between the City of
Caldwell and Edward. J. Shetler.
4. Approve a Public Improvements Deferral
Agreement from Emil and Beverly Klimes;
5. City Council approve the appointment of Patrick
Takagi to the Caldwell Library Board;
6. Reject a bid for the Union Block Building -•--
Demolition Project submitted by Gillingham Construction,
Inc.
MOVED by Nancolas, SECONDED by Earl to accept the Consent
Calendar as amended.
Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Nancolas, Langan,
Carpenter, Houchins, Raymond, and Earl. Those voting no:
none. Absent and not voting: none.
MOTION CARRIED
OLD BUSINESS
(SECOND READING OF BILE NO. 7 TO CREATE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
95- 1 - °,":':.BRACE SEWER PROJECT)
Mayor winder explained that the first reading of this
Bill was on April 3rd and the second reading was delayed
on April 17th until this meeting. He then read Bill No.
7 by title only as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CALDWELL, IDAHO, CREATING
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 95 -1 FOR CALDWELL, IDAHO,
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN 8" SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IN
TERRACE, TETON, SHASTA AND ROOSEVELT STREETS, PROVIDING
FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESSMENTS UPON THE PROPERTY TO BE
BENEFITTED BY SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND FOR THE BASIS OF
MATING SAID ASSESSMENTS; SETTING FORTH THE PROPERTIES TO
BE INCLUDED IN SAID DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR MAKING THE
ASSESSMENT ROLL; PROVIDING FOR THE LENGTH OF TIME AND THE
REASONS FOR MANDATORY CONNECTION TO THE CITY SEWER;
AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A CALL FOR CONSTRUCTION
BIDS.
The Mayor reminded Council of the two areas that Mr.
Eisenbarth would like to see given some consideration.
One was the deletion of the hook up to the sewer on sale
of property and the other was to waive the interceptor
and plant capacity fee.
Councilman Raymond stated that he appreciated the concern
on these two matters. However, he would be a lot more
comfortable if the two items were in written form so they
could discuss the meaning. Mr. Raymond further said. that
he was in favor of having the second reading at this
time. The City Attorney indicated that Council could
amend the Bill at third reading.
MOVED by Raymond, SECONDED by Carpenter that th4_s be
declared the second reading of Bill No. 7.
Roll ca7.1 vote. Those voting yes: Raymond,. Earl,
Nancolas,, Langan, Carpenter, and ouchins_ Those voting
no'. none. Absent and not voting: none.
MOTION CARRIED
Book 36 Page 103
Councilman Raymond further said that he believed if there
was an amendment to be proposed, it should be brought to
the City Engineer by those who have an interest in it.
(SECOND READING OF BILL NO. 9 - ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY WEST OF
MONTANA AVENUE)
The Mayor stated that the next order of business was the
second reading of Bill No. 9 dealing with the annexation
of property west of Montana Avenue. The first reading was
held on the 17th of April. He then read Bill No. 9 by
title only as follows:
AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THAT CERTAIN LAND LIES
CONTIGUOUS OR ADJACENT TO THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
CALDWELL, COUNTY OF CANYON, STATE OF IDAHO; AND THAT SAID
LAND BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF CALDWELL, IDAHO, AS PART
OF THE R -1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT;
AND DECLARING SAID LAND BY PROPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS
DESCRIBED BELOW TO BE A PART OF THE CITY OF CALDWELL,
CANYON COUNTY, IDAHO; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES,
RESOLUTIONS, ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT
HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER AND PLANNING
AND ZONING DIRECTOR TO ADD SAID PROPERTY TO THE OFFICIAL
MAPS OF THE CITY OF CALDWELL, IDAHO; AND DIRECTING THE
CLERK OF THE CITY OF CALDWELL TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF
THE ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE AREAS TO BE ANNEXED WITH
CANYON COUNTY, STATE OF IDAHO AND THE STATE TAX
COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE,
SECTION 63 -2215.
MOVED by Nancolas, SECONDED by Langan that this stand as
the second reading of Bill No. 9.
Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Nancolas, Langan,
Carpenter, Houchins, Raymond, and Earl. Those voting no:
none. Absent and not voting: none.
MOTION CARRIED
(SECOND READING OF BILL NO. 10 - ZONE CHANGE FOR PROPERTY WEST OF
MONTANA AVENUE FROM COUNTY R -1 TO R -1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
Mayor Winder informed Council that the next order of
business was the second reading of Bill No. 10 which was
the zone change for the property west of Montana Avenue.
The Mayor read Bill No. 10 by title only as follows:
AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
WITHIN THE CITY OF CALDWELL, IDAHO FROM COUNTY R -1 TO R -1
(SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ; DETERMINING THAT SAID CHANGE
IN ZONING IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY OF
CALDWELL, IDAHO; INSTRUCTING THE PLANNING AND ZONING
DIRECTOR TO DESIGNATE SAID PROPERTY AS R -1 ON THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND REPEALING ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES
AND RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH.
MOVED by Carpenter, SECONDED by Langan that this stand as
the second reading of Bill No. 10.
Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Carpenter, Houchins,
Raymond, Earl, Nancolas, and Langan. Those voting no:
none. Absent and not voting: none.
NEW BUSINESS
MOTION CARRIED
(DISCUSSION PERTAINING TO DRUG TESTING OF CITY EMPLOYEES)
The Mayor explained that the Safety Committee asked to be
included on the Agenda this evening to discuss the
possibility of drug testing for City employees. He
Book 36
Page 104
recognized Sue Brown, Co- Chairman of the Safety
Committee.
Mrs. Brown reviewed her memo to the Council as follows:
Attached is a draft proposal for random drug and alcohol
testing of Commercial Drivers License holders. Beginning
January 1, 1995, the Department of Transportation is
requiring employers of 50 CDL drivers or less to do pre-
emp-loyment, post accident, reasonable suspicion, and
random testing, along with a. program that establishes
rehabilitation for an employee whose test is .returned
positive. There are many facets to the regulations and
I have a copy of them if anyone is interested in
reviewing them. Attached is a very brief overview of
what will be _required.
She continued the review stating that the Safety
Committee would like to put out the attached proposal.
It includes the writing of a policy and administering the
entire program. We don't believe, due to the extensive
regulations, that the C_ty can manage this program alone.
There are many details regarding cant ident.i_ality, record
keeping, reports to the Federal Government, and chain of
custody of the specimen that would make 1'.r virtually
impossible to manage in house. The Committee would like
the Council to approve the attached proposal at this
time. When any vendors return cost estimates, they will
be presented to the Council for approval. Even though
the amount for these services will be under $5,000,
before any contract will be sianed, a policy will be put
before the Council to become part of the Personnel
Manual.
The City Council discussed this item at some length.
Councilman Nancolas remarked that this Program was far
more than what the City could administer alone. He
further stated that he appreciated the help and the
concern the employees have put into gathering the
information on this project. He definitely felt it was
the right way to go.
Councilman Langan asked if the Committee had considered
or looked into the possibility of doing this program in
conjunction with other agencies such as the County and
etc. Mrs. Brown answered that it was possible, but they
had not investigated it. Councilman Langan also
expressed his appreciation for what the Committee had
accomplished.
The City Attorney commented that the City can adopt a
drug free work place policy. He further stated that
attached to Council's written material was a memorandum
he prepared to answer some of the questions they might
have. If the Policy was built around items that he
included in the memo, the Policy would be legal and
beneficial.
After discussion, it was MOVED by Earl, SECONDED by
Nancolas to authorize the Safety Committee to go out for
proposals_
Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Earl, Nancolas,
Langan, Carpenter, Houchins, and Raymond. Those voting
no: none. Absent and not voting: none.
MOTION CARRIED
(PUBLIC HEARING ON SPRUCE STREET EXTENSION BETWEEN TENTH AN
]LINDEN)
Book 36
Page 105
Mayor Winder recognized Mr. Crooks, the Planning and
Zoning Director, and asked that he present the background
information on this item.
Mr. Crooks explained that this particular item involves
the consideration of opening Spruce Street as a through
street between Tenth Avenue and Kimball Avenue. Although
not mandatory or required by law, the City Staff has
decided to have this item part of a Public Hearing. This
will give the Council an opportunity to receive public
input and testimony from some of the surrounding property
owners in the area. Within the report provided by both
the Engineering and Planning Departments, reasons were
given why they felt the opening of the street was
justified. Generally, the east, west circulation in this
area was very poor. With Beech Street now as a prospect
for handling more traffic out to Kimball Avenue from
Sunridge Subdivision and some of Manchester Park area,
there seems to be a need to try to open up some of the
streets in this area to improve the east, west
circulation. Also, the areas immediately south of the
Spruce Street corridor were likely to be brought into the
City in the near future so there was a need to provide a
right of way not only for traffic vehicles going through,
but also to allow the City some ability and flexibility
to extend services such as sewer and water to the south
to some of those areas that were going to be in need of
them in the near future.
The Mayor stated that only one person was signed to
testify and the only document to be included in the
record was the Staff Report. Mayor winder explained that
the purpose of the hearing was to accept testimony on
this matter. The Public Hearing was then opened.
Terry Johnson, 311 East Spruce Street, testified briefly
explaining his reasons for objecting to the opening of
Spruce Street extension /opening between Tenth Avenue and
Kimball Avenue.
The Mayor also read the following letter he received from
Dorothy and Bob Ring: Thank you for your recent letter.
We are not in favor of putting Spruce through from
Kimball to Tenth Avenue. With multiple jurisdictions and
an irrigation flooding problem at 311 East Spruce, it
would be a costly and unnecessary project. It would
create increased traffic on a narrow street and a
bottleneck at Tenth Avenue and Spruce. We will be out of
town and unable to get to the meeting on May 1, 1995.
MOVED by Earl, SECONDED by Nancolas that since there was
no one else requesting to testify, the Public Hearing be
closed.
Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Earl, Nancolas,
Langan, Carpenter, Houchins, and Raymond. Those voting
no: none. Absent and not voting: none.
MOTION CARRIED
After discussion by the Council, it was agreed that the
Staff be directed to prepare a Resolution for the Spruce
Street Extension /Opening between Tenth Avenue and Kimball
Avenue.
(JOINT EXERCISE OF POWER AGREEMENT: VALLIVUE SCHOOL DISTRICT -
CANXON HIGHWAY DISTRICT NO. 4 - CITY OF CALDWELL: IMPROVEMENT OF
MONTANA AVENUE)
The City Engineer, Mr. Law, presented this item to the
City Council for their consideration. He explained that
over the last year and a half, the City has had a number
Book 36 Page 106
of discussions with Vallivue School District related to
a number of issues in the area of their new high school.
This item continues to be another one which has to do
with the improvement of Montana as it relates to traffic
contiguous and coming from that school. It was
recommended some time ago by the Canyon Highway District
that Montana, which was in their control at the present
time, be upgraded all the way from Ustick to Homedale not
only along the high school frontage, but through the
entire length. There was a number of verbal commitments
made between Vallivue and Canyon Highway District
regarding that improvement and also some commitments from
Vallivue School District to the City of Caldwell
concerning improvements on the school frontage. At the —
same time, the City Engineer on behalf of the City of
Caldwell, indicated a willingness of the City to assist
in providing some data with regard to that street so that
in the final design, there was a good quality street.
One of the major issues that took place was a commitment
by Vallivue to be willing to provide $100,000 in cost
towards the repaving of that entire stretch and also
widening it to a certain extent. Canyon Highway's
commitment was to rebuild the base and the City's
commitment was to provide the testing so that the design
could proceed properly. It was the feeling of the
Highway District's Attorney that it would be appropriate
to have a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement related to
this issue. Because of the City's long standing interest
in that street, it would be best for the City to be
involved. Canyon Highway District's Attorney prepared
the agreement language, it was reviewed by the City
Engineer and it seems to be in order. The City has
already provided them the data necessary for the design
and continue to be interested in the outcome.
Mr_ Law further stated that the Council could either
approve the agreement before them or take no action.
There was a Resolution attached for their consideration.
Mayor Winder read the Resolution as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CALDWELL APPROVING THE
"DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE UPGRADE OF MONTANA AVENUE
CANYON HIGHWAY DISTRICT NO. 4 /VALLIVUE SCHOOL DISTRICT
NO, 139 /CITY OF CALDWELL" AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
OF CALDWELL .
WHFREAS, the City Council of the City of Caldwell
finds that it is in the best interests of the City of
Caldwell to enter into that certain "Development
Agreement fcr the Upgrade of Montana Avenue Canyon
Highway District No. 4 /Vallivue School District No.
139 /City of Caldwell ";
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and
Council of the City of Caldwell, Idaho:
S ection 1: The "Development Agreement for the
Upgrade of Montana Avenue Canyon Highway District No.
4 /Vallivue School District No. 1.39 /City of Caldwell ", a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit " A " and
incorporated herein by reference, be, and the same is
hereby approved.
Section 2: That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to execute and attest, on behalf _
of the City of Caldwell and bind the same, to the terms
and conditions of said "Development Agreement for the
Upgrac'.e of Montana Avenue Canyon Highway District No.
4 /Vall_. School District INC. 139 /City of Caldwell."
Sec ion 3: This Resolution shall be in full force
and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval.
MOVED by Nancolas, SECONDED by Houchins to pass the
Resolution as presented by the Mayor.
Book 36 Page 107
Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Nancolas, Langan,
Carpenter, Houchins, Raymond, and Earl. Those voting no:
none. Absent and not voting: none.
MOTION CARRIED
(SELECTION OF A'VOTING DELEGATE TO THE ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITIES
ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON JUNE 23RD)
Mayor Winder stated that the next item was to select a
voting delegate to the Association of Idaho Cities Annual
Conference. The A.I.C. asks each City to designate a
voting delegate as well as an alternate for their
Conference on June 23rd. The Mayor further informed
Council that he did plan to attend that Conference and
would like to be designated the voting delegate for the
City of Caldwell. Councilman Houchins has also indicated
his willingness to serve as the alternate at that
Conference.
MOVED by Langan, SECONDED by Carpenter that the Mayor be
designated as the Voting Delegate and Councilman Houchins
as the Alternate for the Association of Idaho Cities
Annual Conference on June 23rd.
Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Langan, Carpenter,
Raymond, Earl, and Nancolas. Those voting no: none.
Abstain: Houchins. Absent and not voting: none.
MOTION CARRIED
(FINANCIAL REPORT)
Councilwoman Earl reported that the Finance Committee has
reviewed and approved current accounts payable in the
amount of $313,288.23 and a net payroll of $100,146.38
for the period ended April 21, 1995.
MOVED by Earl, SECONDED by Langan that accounts payable
in the amount of $313,288.23 represented by checks number
41915 through 42100 and payroll for the amount of
$100,146.38 represented by checks number 51842 through
51958 be accepted, payment approved, and the vouchers
filed in the Office of the City Clerk.
Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Earl, Nancolas,
Langan, Carpenter, Houchins, and Raymond. Those voting
no: none. Absent and not voting: none.
MOTION CARRIED
(COMMITTEE REPORTS)
Councilwoman Carpenter reported that the Historic
Preservation Commission sponsored a community workshop on
maintaining and restoring historic homes or other homes
last Saturday. Also informed Council Members that she
attended the long range planning meeting at the Airport.
It was agreed that using Ustick Road as a runway was not
the best idea. If there was a runway extension, it would
go in the Linden direction.
Councilman Houchins stated that he was not able to attend
the Library Board Meeting, but did talk with them later.
The security system was in place and was purchased
through the Margaret Pead Endowment Fund. They also
invited a representative from Edward D. Jones to present
a proposal on alternative ways to invest endowment
monies.
Councilman Raymond reported briefly on the Clean Up
Project expressing his appreciation to everyone who took
Book 36 Page 7.08
part during a rain storm. He also commented that he
thought the merchants were obvious ir. their absence
particularly on Friday since it was the '-Kimball clean up
Councilwoman Earl also commented or.:. the clean u and
expressed her appreciation for the young people who took
part. She informed Council that a memo was placed 111
Council's boxes regarding the upcoming budget sessions
and she would like tc hear back from the Council Members.
Councilman Nancolas reminded everyone to vote on May Ith
on the school Bond Issue.
Councilman Langan stated that everything he planned to
report on was already reported.
(MAYOR'S COI�a' KE.NTS )
Mayor Winder commented on several items including the
good job Leo Holmes did on the flag pole at the Pioneer
Plaza, the Press Conference that was held that morning iz-i
City Hall that dealt with planning of some kind of mass
transit system, the Citizen's Committee will meet with
the City Council at 7:00 on Wednesday, the Ida -Ore Board
of Directors was holding a meeting it- Burns, Oregon on
May 5th and 6th ,which he would he attending, the Townsite
Committee will meet on May 10th at 9:30 a.m., and there
was to be a monthly breakfast meeting with the Canyon
County Commissioners.
(ADJOURNMENT!
Since there was no further business, it was MOVED by
Earl, SECONDED by Langan to adjourn the meeting at 8:55
p.m.
Roll call vote. Those voting yes: Earl, Nancolas,
Langan, Carpenter, :gouchins, and Raymond. Those voting
no: none. Absent and not voting: none.
APPROVED AS written
Uo ncilper
Councilperso�Et�
ATTEST:
MOTION CARRIED
THIS 13 t h DAY OF May 1995 .
Mayor
Councilperson
Councilperson
Councilperson
City Clergy