HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-05-01city council minutes266
necessary sever appurtenances therein, be and the name are hereby approved.
Section 2. That the City Clerk is hereby ordered to prepare and let invitations for bids and pub-
lish the same in the Revs- Tribune, official newspaper of the City of Caldwell, on April 20, 27, and May 4, _
1967, calling for the opening of said bids at the City Hall on the 5th day of May, at the hour of 4;00 o'cloe
P.M., in accordance with Section 50 -2936 of the Idaho Code.
The motion for passage was seconded by Councilman Davenport. A roll call vote was called for When
the following Councilmen voted in the affirmative: Banks, Keys, Martin, Carpenter, and Davenport. Negative
votes: none. Absent and not voting: Harrison. Mayor Smith declared that Resolution No. 10 had passed.
The City Engineer informed the Council that along with the call for bids for construction work unde
the total Improvement District, he would also like to bid the concrete work that goes with the new fire
station, as wall as for sidewalks; and also, another item for replacing some of the bad curbing in some of th
previous Local Improvement Districts; these would be in considerably short sections for some that was poured l
30 years ago and began showing up some 7 years later.
Applications for Bartender Permits approved
Applications for Bartender Permits from Fred Diggs, James Maxwell, and Glenn S. Brannam were pre-
sented for the consideration of the Council. Each application had been approved by the Chief of Police and
was accompanied by a receipt from the Clerk for the required fee.
It was moved by Councilman Martin, seconded by Councilman Banks, that the applications for Bertends
Permits be approved and that the permits be issued. A vote was taken and the motion carried.
Bills for Mid -April
It was moved by Councilman Martin, seconded by Councilman Banks, that the warrants for claims be
approved as per list and filed in the City Clerk's office. Such warrants being in the totals as follows:
Warrant Numbers 255 thru 300, General Fund: ---------- ---- ---------- ----- - - - - -- $ 3,252.12
Warrant Numbers 163 thrc 200, Water & Sewer Fund: Water -------------------- -- 1,159.43
Water, Capital - 51.60
Treatment Plant------ - - - - -- 642.13
Water, General Office - - - - - -- 163.16
Water, Deposit Refund - - - - - -- 2.00
Warrant Numbers 269 thru 325, Special Funds: Fire ------------------ - - - - -- 147.15
Cemetery --------- ---- - -- - - -- 43.63
Street ------ ----- --- -- - - ---- 3,678.75
Street, Capital ------- - - - - -- 3,300.00
sanitation ----------- - - - - -- 249.92
Irrigation ------------ - - - - -- 175.68
Cemetery Sinking ----- - - - - -- 142.01
$ 13,007.
A vote was taken and the motion carried.
There being no further business to come before the Council; it was moved by Councilman Martin, —
seconded by Councilmen Carpenter, that the meeting adjourn. A vote was taken and the motion carried. The
meeting adjourned at 10:00 P. M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MAY 1, 1967
8:00 P. N.
The regular monthly meeting of the City Council met in the Council Chambers of the City Hall with
Mayor N. E. "Coley" Smith presiding.
Upon Roll Call, the following Councilmen answered present: Charles C. Banks, William S. Harrison,
James W. "Bill" Keys, V. .lay Martin, Charles W. Carpenter, and C. A. "Chet" Davenport. Absents none.
Appraisal of property to be m2de
Mayor Smith announced that the first order of business would be to consider the selling of property;
later described an "That portion of Block 90 of Golden Gate Addition to the City of Caldwell, Idaho, lying
i
South of the Notus Canal rigbt -of -way excepting the Plymouth Street right -of- way" and that two gentlemen were
present who had declared their interest in purchasing the property. The Mayor stated that the City acquired
f*VA
1
[ the property many years ago by tax deed and that the property pas all hillside beginning near the present
lavor Freeze. One of the gentlemen present was Clad Van Volkenburg and the approximate location of the
property was identified by map.
In answer to the question, the City Attorney informed the Council that if the property was not
needed for municipal purposes, was not a part of the public park or a playground or public building cite;
thay could offer it for sale by two successive days of publication in accordance pith Section 50 -1008 of the
Idaho Code.
The City Engineer pointed out that there was a triangular piece of property, owned by those presan
lying above the ditch, in which the City was interested in for street purposes. He suggested that this cool
be a consideration in the sale of the city property.
The matter of an appraisal was discussed, afterwhich, it was moved by Councilman Martin, seconded
b Councilman Hanks, to have two local Real Estate Agents appraise the property. In discussion, it was
agreed that Stan Jensen and Junii Yamamoto would be contacted and $20.00 each was suggested as a coat for
their services. A vote on the motion was taken and the motion carried.
Intention to sell property to be advertised
It was then moved by Councilman Carpenter, seconded by Councilman Kara, that the property be ad-
I vertiaed for sale in accordance with Section 50 -1008 of the Idaho Code with the cost of publication to be
paid by the people requesting that it be put up for sale. In discussion, the latter part of this motion was
agreed to by Mr. Van Volkenbarg. A vote was taken and the motion carried.
Bill No. 8 - second reading
The Council then proceeded to the second reading of Bill No. 8, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 10 TO TITLE IX OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF CALUELL, IDAHO, REGULATING THE
SALE CF FIREWORKS IN THE CITY OF CALDWELL., AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT TRERUdITH.
Mayor Smith then informed the Council of and presented another ordinance he had received on fire-
works and said that it was very similar except that it allowed ten days stocking period for fireworks prior
to immediately preceding the day they were placed on public display and, any reputable person or association
or corporation may sell them; that in both cases, whether or not they were for the sale of safe or sane, or
i
one of dangerous fireworks, the fee was ten dollars which would be refunded if the license wasntt approved
and in addition there was an $18.50 fee for investigation which was not refunded in either case. Also, he
said that this particular ordinance allowed the sale of safe and sane fireworks in permanent business
structures which he would recommend to the Council be deleted and require them to be sold only in separate
� I
stands.
In answer to the question concerning the structure, Mayor Smith stated that the ordinance he had
recently received stated that a temporary fireworks structure from which safe and sane fireworks are sold
jishall be subject to the following provisions: First, the stand from which the fireworks will be sold or
stored shall not be located within twenty -five feet of any other building, nor within 100 feet of any gaso
station or flamalbe liquid dispensing service installation; that such stands shall meet the structural
jstability requirements of the code and regulations of the city and all lighting circuits and other electrica
I
equipment shall meet the requirements of the electrical regulations of the city; that the stand shall have
exit doors at least 30 inches wide at both ends of the structure and one additional door for each 25 feet of
rear wall in excess of 25 feet; that all doors shall open outward from the stand and all doors should be key
free and clear of all supplies and materials; and that each stand shall be provided with a minimum of two,
2 -k g&Uon soda and acid type fire extinguishers.
After some discussion concerning the cost of construction, the problems for some businesses to con-
struct a stand 25 feet from their business, attendance at the stand when closed, the coat of permits and fees
for investigation, and whether or not the sale of safe and sane fireworks could be profitable under the air-
. eumstances; Mr. Bill Wilson of the Penny Wise Drug Store was recognized.
i
Mr. Wilson stated that he objected to one part of the ordinance and this was the part in which only
'non- profit organizations could sell fireworks; that he thought it was a very poor ordinance to pat it into a
non - profit organization other than in whatever other sources there may be. He stated that, snow, if you fee
9
that it is unsafe and shouldn't be sold and pass an ordinance to prohibit the sale of them then this I wool
have no objection to at all, but I do feel that it is wrong to put in on a non- profit organization basis ".
He added that in reference to the profit, "if someone can make $300.00, I would like to know somebody that _
could on the sale of fireworks. Now last year, I think we sell probably as many fireworks as anybody, our
purchase in fireworks was under $600.00 and these were two items; sparklers and snakes and basically in
sparklers. We sold them at a mark -up of approximately 30 %, somewhere between 25 and 30 %, and if somebody can
make $300.00 on that, why more power to them, and, if somebody has to construct and build a structure for
them, I don't think they can come out on it; they can't even break even on them ".
Mayor Smith pointed out that there was quite an extended lint of things which encouraged the sale
more and Mr. Wilson replied: "I have a copy of two or three lists but my feeling is that somebody, especia-
lly s oomparq that is in the interest of selling these things to a non - profit organization, is attempting to
got this type of an ordinance back in the city whereby they will work a non- profit organization and bring
them in and take them back, if they don't sell them; and, of course, I don't feal - I suppcse this is a
matter of opinion - but I don't feel that sparklers are of any significance, of being dangerous, and eonsid-
Bred to be a fireworks. I feel that there are probably many, many items that are sold everyday that are far
more dangerous than a sparkler; bat, like I said, if it was decided that you consider it dangerous to sell
them at all, it is an entirely different thing than opposed to letting only non - profit organizations sell
them although I think sparklers are subject to different consideration than the others."
Mayor Smith stated that he didn't think anybody was particularly argusing about that even though 11
the first ordinance was read with that provision in it; that it was done so because it takes three readings 1I
and there was plenty of discussion time. He further stated, however, that the only problem in this was that
i
the merchants were running out of time to order merchandise and the Council should give some permanent
eommmittmente as to their intentions at this meeting in order to be fair to the local merchants.
In further discussion with Mr. Wilson, he told the Council that he thought it would cost as much
money to build a structure as the entire amount they would take in on sparklers that they sold although, in
answer to the question as to whether his sales wouldn't increase as he increased his stock and made available
a greater variety, he stated that he would assume this was probably so but he didn't know how mach demand
there was for the other type of items since he didn't know how well they do sell in this line but that he
knew that he wouldn't attempt to sell them if he had to move them outside the building; had to build a
special structure and hire somebody to stay there when it was closed.
After some further discussion; the Council preceded to determine what changes should be made in the
present ordinance before the Council, prior to the third reading, and in order that the businessmen would have
a committment of their intentions.
It was moved by Councilman Carpenter, seconded by Councilman Davenport, that all safe and sane fire".
works be permitted to be sold in the business buildings. A roll call vote was called for when the following
i
Councilmen voted in the affirmative: Banka, Harrison, Keys, Martin, Carpenter, and Davenport. Negative
votes: none. Absent and not voting: none. Mayor Smith declared that the motion had passed.
It was moved by Councilman Carpenter, seconded by Councilman Banks, that we eliminate all fees. A
vote was taken and the motion carried.
It was then agreed that the insurance coverage limits for both public liability coverage and for Ii
product& liability coverage would be at least $50,00D.00 per person per occurrence bodily injury, $100,000.00
,
per occurrence aggregate bodily injury, and $10,000.00 per occurrence aggregate property damage for a "Safe 11
Fireworks Permit "; that such fireworks could be sold from June 20th to August let, and applications would be 11
investigated by the Fire Department. It was moved by Councilman Keys, seconded by Councilman Carpenter, that'!
J
this be a firm eommittment to the merchants and there would be no changes. A vote was taken and the motion i
carried.
Proposed ordinance - Covmercial Spraying - discussed
The proposed ordinance for commercial spraying licensee in Caldwell as previously discussed f
(Minutes - page 257 end 262) was referred to and a discussion held as to what requirements might be included p
269
in the ordinance and the problems of determining violations from chemicals used. It seemed agreeable with
the Council then that an ordinance not be considered at this time for licensing other than the present contra
as exercised in the licensing of Door -to -Door solicitations.
High School students commended
Mayor Smith referred to the apparent drowning of Doctor Oaks H. Hoover at Lake Lowell and stated
that he thought the students from the Caldwell High School should be given credit publicly for taking food
from the Senior Banquet cut to the searchers and assistance given in hunting for his body.
'Disposal Form No. 7 approved
Disposal Form No. 7 requesting the disposal of all duplicate tax receipts, miscellaneous receipts,
bonds and coupons and warrants from 1961 back as on file; was presented for the consideration of the Council
with the following recommendations from the City Treasurer: "In reference to Code 50 -2011: Retention of
Municipal records. As I read this, all the above may be burned as they are not of any Historical value and
none of them are original copies."
It was moved by Councilman Harrison, seconded by Councilman Carpenter, that the disposal of these
Ireeords be approved as per recommendation. A vote was taken and the motion carried.
Recommendations from Building Inspector - amendments to Sign Code
The following letter recommending amendments to the Sign Code from the Building Inspector was read
Y the consideration of the Council:
May 1, 1967
To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: The Building Inspector
Addition to 1964 Sign Code as adopted by the City of Caldwell:
Addition to Chapters 6 and 7:
Ground and Pole Signs
Not more than one square foot of advertising area allowed for every one lineal foot of
frontage abutting roadway or public area with less than ten fact of vertical clearance
from ground or sidewalk level.
Not more than two square feet of advertising area allowed for every one lineal foot of
frontage abutting roadway or public area with less than twenty feet of vertical clear-
ance from ground or sidewalk level.
Sign supports, superstructure or decoration not to constitute a blocking effect of over
twenty per cent of area below sign or between supports.
Addition to Chapter 10, Table 9A change as follows:
Project over public property or beyond a legal setback line.
Less than ten feet not permitted.
Ten to twelve feet, two feet, plus 6 inches for every foot of clearance in excess of
ten feet.
Twelve to sixteen feet, seven feet, plus six inches for every foot of clearance in
excess of twelve feat.
Over sixteen feet, nine feet maximum.
Blanketing prohibited.
When applied to signs or other structures projecting over the sidewalk or public right
of way blanketing shall be deemed to mean the complete abetting off the facr of another
sign at a distance of twenty five feet from a perpendicular line drawn from the sign
blanketed to the sidewalk.
Change Caldwell City Code Section 5 -6 -2 (D) to read:
(D) Chapter 3, Section S -304 (a) shall be rewritten to read as follows: "Sign
Permit Fees: A fee of ten cents (10¢) shall be charged for each square foot of adver-
tising apace, measured on one (1) side, for sign permits for electric signs. No permit
fee, however, for electric signs shall be lass than two dollars ($2.00).
Permit fees for unlighted signs and billboards shall be charged at the rate of five
cents (50) per square foot of area of advertising space with a minimum fee of one dollar
($1.00).
Respectfully submitted,
Jess Dods
Building Inspector
The Building Inspector commented in that it was not intended to prohibit the natural use of signs
but that the only thing be had in mind was restricting someone who definately had it in mind to box somethin
else through the use of signs. It was agreed that members of the Council should check the recommendations
270
with the Building Inspector in his office and the matter again be considered by the Council at a later data.
Request concerning drive -in mail box denied
The matter of a request from Postmaster Jim Lyke concerning a drive -in mail box, previously discusal
ad and referred back to the Chief of Police, was again referred to and the following letter read:
April 27, 1967
Tot The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: The Office of the Chief of Police
Sabjectt Drive -1n Nail box at 11th and Cleveland
Gentlemen:
Mr. Jim Lyke, Postmaster for the City of Caldwell was contacted as per your
request at the Council meeting on April 17, 1967.
Mr. Lyke stated that he had a request from approximately six (6) business men
that a drive -in mail box be placed in the area of 11th and Cleveland. Mr. Tyke further
stated that he did not feel that there was too much of a problem in this area at this
time and would just as soon keep the mail pick -up points closer to the Post Office at
this time. However, if this does become a large enough problem he will contact us again.
Due to the results of the interview with Mr. Lyke, I would recomment that the
request for a drive -in mail box at Ilth and Cleveland be denied at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
—
Charles W. Astleford
Chief of Police
It was moved by Councilman Davenport, seconded by Councilman Banks, that the request for a drive -in
mail box at nth and Cleveland be denied. A vote was taken and the motion carried.
Report of City Sanitation Department read
The monthly report from the City Sanitation Department was read for the month of April and ordered
placed on file.
Report of Police Department
The monthly report from the Police Department for April, 1967, was read for the consideration of
the Council and ordered placed on file.
Application for Pool license renewal approved
An application from Michael E. McAllister d/b /a Little Mac's for the renewal of a Pool License for
the second quarter of 1967 was presented for the consideration of the Council. Said application wag accompan
ied by a receipt from the Clerk for the required fee.
It was moved by Councilman_ Martin, seconded by Councilmen Banks, that the application for renewal
of Pool License be approved and that the License be issued. A vote was taken and the motion carried.
Resolution No. 11
Councilman Martin sponsored the following Resolution and moved its passage-
MOIDTTON NO. 11
BI COUNCIIMAN MARTIN
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING TEE ASSESSMENT ROLL OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 60 FOR THE CITY OF CAUMELL,
CANYON COUNTY, IDAHO} AUTHORIZING THE ClBRK TO GIVE NOTICE OF THE TIME AND PLACE FOR BEARING AND CONSIDERING
OBJECTIONS TO THE SAID ASSESSMENT ROIL; FIUNG THE TIME FOR HEARING AND CONSIDERING SAID OBJECTIONS AND PRE-
SCRIBING THE FORM OF NOTICE.
WHEREAS, The assessment roll of Local Improvement District No. 60 for the City of Caldwell, Canyon
County, Idaho, has been completed in compliance with the provisions of the laws of the State of Idaho, in
such cases made and provided, and the ordinances of the City of Caldwell, Canyon County, Idaho, said assess-
ment roll having been prepared and made out by the Committee on Sewers, together with the City Engineer, con-
taining the number of assessments, the names of the owner if known, and if not known, that the name is on-
known, a description of each tract assessed and the total amount of the assesementa, and said assessment roll'I;
having been so prepared was certified to the Council of the City of Caldwell by the Committee on Sewers and h�
the City Engineer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Mayor and Council of the City of Caldwell, Idaho:
Section 1. That the assessment roll of Local Improvement District No. 60 for the City of Caldwell,
Canyon County, Idaho, be and the same is hereby accepted and placed on file in the office of the City Clerk
of the City of Caldwell, Canyon County, Idaho. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give'
due and legal notice, in compliance with the provisions of law, to the owner or owners of property which is
279
assessed in said aaaeasment roll, whether named or not named, by publication in three successive issues of
r— the News- Tribune, a daily newspaper printed and publixhed in the City of Caldwell, Idaho, and the official
newspaper of the City of Caldwell. Said notice shall state that the said property owners may file, within
ten (10) days from the first publication of said notice of time to file objections to said assessment roll,
and that objections will be considered by the Mayor and Council on the 15th day of May, 1967, at 8:00 o'cloc
P.M.
Section 2. That said notice shall be in substantially the following foray to -wit:
NOTICE OF REGEIPT OF ASSESSMENT ROLL OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 110. 60 FOR THE CITY CF CALDWSLL, CANYON
COUNTY, IDAHO, BY THE CITY CLERK AND OF THE TIME AND PLACE FOR FILING PROTESTS TO SUCH AS.SE9.S W ROLL AIM
OF THE TIME SET FOR HEARING PROTESTS BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That the assessment roll of local Improvement District No. 60 for the City
of Caldwell, Canyon County, Idaho, is now on file in my office in the City Hall of the City of Caldwell,
Canyon County, Idaho, that the same was filed at 5 :00 o'clock P.M. on the lot day of May, 1967, and that the
Olty Council will meet on the 15th day of Play, 1967, at 8:00 o'clock P.M. at the City Council Chambers in the
City Hall in said City of Caldwell, Canyon County, Idaho, to hear and consider objections to said assessment
roll by the party or parties aggrieved by such assessment. The owners or owner of any property which is
assessed in said assessment roll, whether named or not named in each assessment roll, may, within ten (10)
days from the first publication of the notice, file his objections in writing to said assessment roll in
which objection is made as well as the specific ground for such objection. The assessment roll will be open
for inspection at the office of the City Clerk of the City of Caldwell, Canyon County, Idabo, on each and
every day except Saturdays, Sundays and holidays between the hours of 9:00 o'clock A.M. and 5:00 o'clock P.M.
The motion for passage was seconded by Councilman Davenport. A roll call vote was called for when
the following Councilmen voted in the affirmative: Banks, Harrison, Keys, Martin, Carpenter, and Davenport.
Negative votes: none. Absent and not voting: none. Mayor Smith declared that Resolution No. 11 had
Passed.
Payment from State reported
The City Engineer reported that the City had received payment for the State's part of this but the
it wasn't in the assessment roll as it was not part of the District.
Report on Court proceedings - Tri -West Construction Co.
The City Attorney reported that he still didn't know what the situation was in the court case with
Tri West Construction Co. (see Minutes - Page 262) in connection with Ben Anderson who had sold the property
e contract, only that they weren't making payments to him and had notified him that they were going to for -
feit itl that Mr. Anderson was represented by Alexanderson and Davis and they had written Tri -West Construct
ion making a demand for the property.
Applications for Bartender Permits approved
Applications for Bartender Permits from Tauna Wilson, Kitty Sanders, Roy Jackson Tafertiller, and
Vicki Rayne were prevented for the consideration of the Council. Each application had been approved by the
Chief of Police and was accompanied by a receipt from the Clerk for the required fee.
It Was moved by Councilman Martin, seconded by Councilman Davenport, that the applications for
Bartender Permits be approved and that the permits be issued. A vote was taken and the motion carried.
,!Report on old City Hall - Fire Station.
Mayor Smith informed the Council that the contractor would start clam - shelling the old city hall
and fire station building tomorrow after having completed the demolition of the old police building.
Bills for End-Apri1
It was moved by Councilman Martin, seconded by Councilman Banks, that the warrants for claims and
i
,payrolls be approved as per list and filed in the City Clark's office. Such warrants being in the total& as
follows:
Warrant Numbers 301 thru 348, General Funds ---------------------- - - - - -- - - - -- $ 6,224.58
Warrant Numbers 201 thru 216, Water & Sewer Fund: Water ------------------- - - - - -- 575.09
Water Improvement - -- - - - - -- 10,495.15
Treatment Plant ___ _________ _ __ 165.68
j� Water, General Office --------- 11079.98
272
Warrant Numbers 326 thru 351, Special Funds; Fire ----- -- ------ - - - - -- ------- $ 49.59
Cemetery ------ -- ---- ----- - ----- 26.00
Street ------------ — -----------
636.42
Street, Capital -- -------- - - - - -- 11,923.94
Sanitation -------------------- 24.35
Sanitation, Contracts --- - - - - -- 5,292.62
Armor
y ------ -- - --- -- - - --- -- 289.92
Irrigation ------------ _ - - ° -- 4.25
New Fire Station Building - --- 10,665.00 !
L.I.D. #60 ------- ------- -- - - -- 18.36
L.I.D. #61 ---------- -- ------- 6.00
$7,0
Warrant Numbers 544 thre 612 excepting #544, 547, 549, 551, and 552, General Fund
Payroll - April --------- ------ ----- ------- ---- - - - - -- 25,674.69
Warrant Numbers 613 thru 670, including #547, 551, and 552, Special rands Payroll
- April ----- ------------------------------------- 15,356.99
Warrant Numbers 671 thru 696, including #544 and 549, Water & Setter Fund Payroll
April ------------°---------- ---------- - °-- -- ---- -- $ 77 3 00 17
A vote was taken and the motion carried.
It was moved by Councilman Harrison, seconded by Councilman Banks, that the meeting recess until
4:00 P. M. on May 5, 1967. A vote was taken and the motion carried. The meeting recessed at 9:55 P. M.
� Mayor
COUNCIL CHAMEM
MAY 5, 1967
4:00 P. M.
The Council met pursuant to recess and acknowledgement of notice in the following form:
We, the undersigned Mayor and Members of the City Council of the City of Caldwell, Idaho, do hereby
acknowledge notice of a Recessed Meeting of the said City Council to be held in the Council Chambers in the
City Hall in the City of Caldwell, Idaho, at the hour of 4:00 P. M., on the 5th day of May, 1967, for the
transaction of all business in connection with the following object: Opening of bids for construction work
under Local Improvement District No. 61.
Witness our signatures this 5th day of May, 1967.
/,)o o ran /, ./,' — _ , a
-- Counc
Mayor N. E. "Coley" Smith presiding.
Upon Roll Call, the following Councilmen answered present: Charles C. Banks, William S. Harrison,
F. Jay Martin, Charles W. Carpenter, and C. A. "Chet" Davenport. Absent: James W.
"Bill" Keys.
Bide opened for construction work - L.I.D. #61
Bide were than opened as follows:
Michaelis Builders - 1811 State Street, Box 830 - Nampa, Idaho
Accompanied by Cashier's Check #060018296 in an amount of $1,565.34
BID SCBEDUIR "A" -----------------------------------------------------
$ 21,617.89
BID SCHEDULE, "B" -------------------
3,871.70
BID SCHEDULE "C" ---------------------------------------- - ----------
(no bid)
BID SCHEDULE "D" ---------------------- ----- -----------------------
1,657.02
BID SCHEDULE
BID SCHEDULE "F" ----------------- - ---------------------------------
1,000.12 h
Gray Construction - Rt #2 Box 251A - Nampa, Idaho
Aeeempanied by Cashier's Check
'
#390004458 in an amount or $1,500.00
BID SCHEDULE ° A' ---------------- -- - ---- ----------- -- ----- - - - - --
$ 20,537.06
BID S CREDUIS °B: ---v
BID s c�roci� c ---- -- - - - -- -- -- ----------- - - -_-- --- --
( o )
BID SCHEDULE "D" --- --- ----------------- -- ----------------- - ----
1,576.60
S - _ __ °______ —
HID e H
n3n HBDUL& "" ---- n-----_---- ___.,_-- °------'- °— ° .
3 77
077 53
3,0.5 �
J
J