Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-02-16city council minutes225 Warrant Numbers 49 thru 70, Special Funds: Fire --------------------- - - ---- -. $ 181.17 Cemetery --- ----- ------ --- - -- 37.26 Street ---------- — ---- ------ - ---- 1,330.08 Sanitation Contract ----- --- - - - - -- 9,869.21 Irrigation - ------- --------- ---- - --- 11.36 Warrant Numbers 152 thru 212, (excepting #153 & N154) - General Fund Payroll, January -------- - ------------------ --- ----; --- -- 27,588.17 Warrant Numbers 213 thru 266, (including #153 & #154) - Special Funds Payroll January ---------------- ----- ----------------- - - - - -- 15,901.34 Warrant Numbers 267 thru 293, - Water & Saner Funds Payroll, January ------------ -- -- 7 g7 p2 A vote was taken and the motion carried. It was moved by Councilman Banks, seconded by Councilman Keys, that the meeting recess to 8.-00 P.M on the 16th day of February, 1970. A vote was taken and the motion carried. The meeting recessed at 11:05 I P. M. / / / COUNCIL CHAMBERS FEBRUARY 16, 1970 8 .-00 P. M. The Council met pursuant to recess and acknowledgement of notice in the following form: We, the undersigned Mayor and Members of the City Council of the City of Caldwell, Idaho, do here acknowledge notice of a recessed meeting of the said City Council to be held in the Council Chambers in the City Hall in the City of Caldwell, Idaho, at the hour of 8:00 P.M., on the 16th day of February, 1970, for the transaction of all business in connection with the following object: New and unfinished business. Witness our signatures this 16th day of February, 1970. �7 unc a �i Coon Mayor Charles W. Carpenter presiding. Upon Boll Call, the following Councilmen answered present: Charles C. Banks, Alfred R. M atuakey, lamea W. "Bill" Keys, P. Jay Martin, and James R. Dakan. Absent: C. A. "Chet 11 Davenport. Intent to annex discussed Mayor Carpenter referred to the previous resolution of the Council declaring the intent of annexing two enclaves in the City limits and he recognized the City Attorney in this regard. Mir. Wayne E. Davis told the Council that, as he understood, the statute 50-222 of the Idaho We ras amended in 1969 to provide that where a piece of property is entirely surrounded by properties lying rithin the City boundaries, it shall be competent for the Council, by ordinance, to declare the same, by .-roper legal description thereof, a part of such City. Yr. Davis then commented in that their office had gone to the Supreme Court two times involving uinexation questions in the City of Middleton and the City of Nampa; that, if he wnderstood the low resulting 'rom those two cases, the Supreme Court had held that the City Council must act in all fairness in giving the moperty owner some consideration. He said the statute was pretty harsh, in his opinion, in that a property wner could be placed at a considerable cost to petition to be taken out of the City after being annexed and .hat he thought there should be some negotiation with the property owners before the passage of an ordinance. He referred to the 30 acres belonging to one owner and said he wondered if the City needed all 10 acres now or would the east 10 acres abutting South Kimball Avenue be sufficient and how much would the 226 owner's taxes be increased; that he thought the owner would be reasonable if he was talked to but to just bring in the 30 acres and double his taxes for no particular reason - he didn't think this was the intent of the law or the interpretation of the Supreme Court; that he also wondered about the other 10 acres and whether or not the entire 10 acres was needed at this time. Mayor Carpenter referred to the question of what protection the City might have from the County from the standpoint of future development on the 20 acres of the one property if only 10 acres were annexed. The provisions of sections 50 -304 and 50 -334 were discussed relative to health hazards afterwhich the City Attorney told the Council that he thought they should let the owners of these properties be heard and that he would be glad to talk to them and they could discuss it with the Mayor and be given that much consideration. In answer to the question relative to the 30 acres, the City Engineer told the Council that the whole section south of the 30 acres would need sewer eventually and that one line would follow the drain approximately along what was the line of the 10 acre tract west of South Kimball Avenue; that the owner had been consulted in the past and wouldn't give right -of -way for one -half of Maple Street so Mr. Loop had given It all north of the boundary line and inside the City - this had reference to the second 10 acres west o£ South Kimball Avenue. Also, Mr. Feller had talked with the owner of the property about right -of -way along the north side of the first 10 acres and that hadn't been successful; that he understood the reason was that the owner thought it might be interpreted as a beginning of subdividing and subject his property to annexation. adth reference to the other 10 acres located on Canyon Hill, W. Iewis said there had been some owners in the past who had wanted a Local Improvement District there and wasn't possible in that part was cut of the City and couldn't be assessed in such a District; also, the engineering department had worked with some of the owners on the west side in developing what might be a right-of-way plan, if it were to develop, bat this had merely been discussion. Councilman Martin referred to his motion of intent in this matter and said he would like to en- courage the highest and best use of the land in as much as it was surrounded by the City but he thought this was the best approach. After some further discussion; it was moved by Councilman McCluskey, seconded by Councilman Martin, that the City Attorney contact the tiro owners of the property involved for the purpose of meeting with him, along with the City Engineer, to discuss the matter and then report back to the Council. A vote was taken and the motion carried. Bill No. 4 - Title amended Mayor Carpenter referred to Bill No. 4 and told the Council that it would he necessary to determine where the ordinance would be placed in the City Code, if passed and approved. He said this would be establis ing a new Commission and possibly it should be placed in Title II of the City Code as a new Chapter or, possibly it could be placed in the health and sanitation section of the City Code. It was moved by Councilman McCloskey, seconded by Councilman Hanks, that the Title of Pill No. 4 be amended to read: "An Ordinance to amend Title II of City Code of Caldwell, County of Canyon, State of Idaho, by adding thereto the following Sanitation and Beautification Commission as Chapter 9 of said Title I] A vote was taken and the motion carried. Pill No. 4 - Ordinance No, 1187 BL11 No. 4, entitled: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE II OF CITY CODE OF CAMELL, COUNTY OF CANYON, STATE OF IDARD, EY ADDING THERETO THE FOILWINO SANITATION AND BEAUTIFICATION C0%,XISSION AS CHAPTER 9 of SAID TITIE 11. was read for the second time and the Council proceeded to consideration of 311 No. 4. It was moved by Councilman McCloskey, seconded by Councilman Banka, that the rules requiring the reading of a Rill an three separate days be suspended and that Rill No. 4 be read the third time in full, section by section. The Mayor directed the Clerk to call the roll on the above motion with the following result: Those voting in the affirmative were: Banks, McCluskey, Keys, Martin, and Dakan. Negative votes: none. Absent and not voting: Davenport. The Mayor declared the motion had passed by the necessary one -half plus one of the members of the cull Council and directed the Clerk to read Bill No. 4 the third time in full, section by section. The 227 r� i Clerk read the Bill as directed. It was moved by Councilman McCluskey, seconded by Councilman Banks, that Bill No. 4 pass. The Mayor directed the Clerk to call the roll on the above motion which resulted as foll Those voting in the affirmative were: Banks, rt aluskey, Keys, Martin, and Dakan. Negative votes: none. Absent and not voting: Davenport. Thereupon, the Mayor declared that Bill No. 4 had passed and the Mayor in open session of the Council duly signed and approved the Bill and the Clerk duly signed and attested the same which became Ordinance No. 1187. The Mayor directed the Clerk to make proper entry of the same and to cause Ordinance No. 1187 to b published in the Naws.- Tribune, the official newspaper of the City of Caldwell, Idaho. Appointment of Sanitation Officer discussed Councilman Martin then inquired if now, after having passed the ordinance, did they need a Sanitation Officer in that perhaps someone should be appointed so as to be in on the beginning. Mayor Carpenter stated that he would think so, in order to make it work, that he didn't have any- one in mind at the present time for this position but possibly could by the next meeting. Councilman It Cluskey said his interpretation of a regulatory officer was to have Mr. Dufur as a member of the Commission in order to get it started, that he thought hk. Dufur was very well qualified and very well liked. He said that, in the event a full time Sanitation Officer were to be appointed, they were back to the cost involved for the City that he didn't think was necessary. Mayor Carpenter commmented in that this might work out but there were a lot of things involved and he didn't know if Mr. Dufur would be able to take care of all the load or not and pointed out that, with a Commission such as this, it could increase the work load as far as a Sanitation Officer was concerned be- cause there could be more things brought to his attention. He suggested that they might feel the way along and see what was involved and, if to many things were let slide, it might then be necessary to make another appointment. He said the ultimate goal was to eventually solve the problems in sanitation and beautiflcatiw throughout the City and surely at the least possible expense. Councilman McCluakey said that he would agree that this could very well increase the work load and referred to polution problems throughout the area which also fit in with this program. He said he thought they could work closely with the Mayor with regards to the regulatory officer. Councilman McCluskey also suggested that he would like to see himself and Councilman Dakan serve on this Committee as representatives of the City Council. Mayor Carpenter said that they would automatically serve without further appointment in that they were all ready assigned to Sanitation. Request to install curb and gutter approved - Cinderella Park Addition The following request to install curb and gutter from Vern H. Rudolph, Eleanor Rudolph and Frances Felton was presented for the consideration of the Council: Caldwell, Idaho February 16, 1970 Hon. Charles Carpenter May= of the City of Caldwell and The City Councilmen of the City of Caldwell Gentlemen: We request of the City of Caldwell that we be permitted to install all or a part of the curb and gutter in Cinderella Park Addition and the adjoining property be- longing to Mrs. Frances Felton, without the usual charge of .75 per running foot by the City. 7 We understand there is a proposal to form a Local Improvement District in this area, but due to the:fact that we own such a large portion of this property, we would like to install some or all of the curb and gutter at our own cost, which would hold down a large assessment against our properties. We hope the Council will see fit to grant this request. Respectfully submitted, Vern H. Rudolph Eleanor Rudolph Frances Felton 229 Councilman Keys raised the question that, it allowed, should a time limit be placed for completion of the installation of the curb and gutter as requested. The City Engineer said that this was taken care of as it was set forth in the information sheet for the Improvement District. It was than moved by Councilman Keys, seconded by Councilman Martin, that the request of Vern H. Rudolph, Eleanor Rudolph,and Frances Felton be granted. A vote was taken and the motion carried. Plans and Specifications presented - L.I.D. No. 65 City Engineer Mel Lewis informed the Mayor and Council that the Plans and Specifications for Local Improvement District No. 65 were present and were for the Irrigation District formed late last spring with the intent of having the system ready for delivery of irrigation water this next irrigation season. He said , 1 the property owners had all been notified as to the costs through information sheets and his department was now working with them in order to determine how they would irrigate their properties since some hadn't been planned for irrigation; also, that the requirements set forth that the work be completed by the 3rd of April. Resolution No. 4 Councilman Dakan sponsored the following Resolution and moved its passage: RESOLUTION NO. 4 BY COUNCILMAN DAKAAJ A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVF.,MENTS IN LOCAL IMPROVEMEN� DISTRICT DISTRICT N0. 65 OF THE CITY OF CALDT✓LL, IDAHO, AUTHORIZING THE INVITATION FOR BIDS AND SETTING A DATE FOR OPENING BIDS. WHEREAS, The Mayor and Council of the City of Caldwell, Idaho, have heretofore duly and regularly as required by law, created Local Improvement District ',do. 65 of the City of Caldwell, Idaho, for the pur- pose of constructing irrigation pipelines, lateral extensions, valved outlets, check boxes, overflow lines and all other irrigation appurtenances necessary for the comfort, convenience and well -being of the City of Caldwell; and WHEREAS, The City Engineer of the City of Caldwell has prepared and filed with the City Clerk of said City, plans and specifications for the construction of said improvements in said Local Improvement District No. 65 of the City of Caldwell, Idaho, which said plans and specifications have been presented to the Mayor and City Council and approved; and WHEREAS, It is desirable to invite bids for the construction of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, Pe it resolved and ordered by the Mayor and Council of the City of Caldwell, Idaho; section 1. That the plans and specifications heretofore prepared by the City Engineer and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Caldwell, for the construction of certain improvements authorized Jr, said Local Improvement District No. 65 of the City of Caldwell, Idaho, for the purpose of constructing in said district improvements consisting of irrigation pipelines, lateral extensions, valved outlets, check boxes, overflow lines and all other irrigation appurtenances necessary for the comfort, convenience and well -being of the City of Caldwell, be and the same hereby are approved. Section 2. That the City Clerk is hereby ordered to prepare and let invitations for bids and publish the same in the News Tribune, official newspaper of the City of Caldwell, on February 18th and 25th, 1970, and March 4, 1970, calling for the opening of said bids at the City Hall on March 5, 1970, at the hour of four o'clock P.M., in accordance with Section 50 -1703 of the Idaho Code. The motion for passage was seconded by Councilman McCloskey. A roll call vote was called for when the following Councilmen voted in the affirmat Banks, McCloskey, Keys, Martin and Dakan. Negative votes: none. Absent and not voting: Davenport, Mayor Carpenter declared that Resolution No. 4 had passed. Resolution No. 5 Councilman Keys sponsored the following Resolution and moved its Passage; RE30LUTICN NO. 5 BY COnCIIMAN KEYS A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSAL TO ISSUE AND SELL BONDS OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 64 OF THE CITY OF CAIDWELL, IAT THE COUNTY OF CANYON, STATE OF IDAHO, AND INVITING AND RECEIVING BIDS THMP, -OR. 229 y BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the City of Caldwell, Idahoz Section 1. That notice is hereby authorized, ordered and directed to be given and published as hereinafter provided, that the Mayor and Council of the City of Caldwell, Idaho, propose to sell and invite written proposals for the purchase of bonds of Local Improvement District No. 64 of the City of Caldwell, Canyon County, Idaho, in the amounts and for the purposes specified in the following form, to -wits NOTICE OF PROPOSAL TO ISSUE AND SELL BONDS CF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 63 OF THE CITY OF CALDWELL, IN THE COUNTY OF CANYON, STATE OF IDAHO, AND INVITING AND RECEIVING BIDS THEREFOR. Public Notice is hereby given that sealed bids for the purchase of bonds of Local Improvement District No. 64 of the City of Caldwell, in the County of Canyon, State of Idaho, will be received at the office of the City Clerk until Monday, the 16th day of March, 1970, at the hour of 8 :00 o'clock P.M. Said bonds shall be in an amount aggregating the principal sum of Forty -One Thousand Three Hundred Seven and 33/100 Dollars ($412307.33) in denominations of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) each, except Bond No. 1, which shall be in an amount of Three Hundred Seven and 33/100 Dollars ($307.33); said bonds shall be numbered consecutively from 1 to 82 inclusive, to be dated February 1, 1970, payable numerically in ten (10) installments, of approximately equal amounts each year, each installment of bonds maturing in respective years annually from 1970 -1980, inclusive; but shall be subject to call an any interest date following the delinquency of any installment of the assessment, said bonds to bear interest at such rate or rates not greater than five (5) per cent per annum, as may be determined at the time of sale, payable semi-annually on the let day of February and the 1st day of August of each year at the office of the City Treasurer of the City of Caldwell, Idaho, or The Bank of Idaho, Caldwell Office, Caldwell, Idaho. Bidders are to submit said bids specifying the lowest rate of interest and premium, if any above par, at which the bidder will purchase said bonds or the lowest rate of interest at which the bidder will purchase said bonds, and all tenders, bids, or offers to purchase must be addressed to the Mayor and Council of the City of Caldwell, Idaho, without condition or qualifications, and be accompanied by a certi- fied check on some bank in the State of Idaho, payable to the City Treasurer of said City in the amount of five per cent (5$) of amount of bid, or being a cash deposit in the like amount, to be forfeited to the City as liquidated damages should the successful bidder fail or refuse to take up or pay for the bonds within thirty (30) days after the notice by the City of its readiness to deliver said bonds. Unsuccessful bidders will be returned their certified checks. All bids shall be conditioned upon the approving of a satisfactory legal opinion as to the legality of said issue; provided, however, that said bonds shall not be sold for less than their face or par value and accrued interest at the time of disposal by the City Treasurer, under the general supervision of the Mayor and Council. The said City will furnish the bonds, Each of the said bonds and each of the coupons attached thereto, shall be duly and regularly issued in fora and contents in conformity with Chapter 29, Title 50 of the Idaho Code of the State of Idaho, and all other laws thereto enabling or in amendment thereof. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Mayor and City Council of the City of Caldwell, Idaho. ATTEST! JOHN L. ENGLEHART CHARLES W. CARPENTER Mayor City Clerk Section 2. That said notice shall be the same as hereby ordered, published at least once a week for a period not less than three consecutive calendar weeks prior to the 16th day of March, 1970, in the News - Tribune, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause said notice to be published as hereinabove mentioned and procure proof of said publication in duplicate in the form of publisher to affidavit, one of which he will preserve as a part of the records and files in his office, and the other of which he will furnish to the purchaser of said bonds. 230 The motion for passage was seconded by Counci Banks. A roll call vote was called for when the following Councilman voted in the affirmative: Banks, McGluskey, Keys, Martin and Dakan. Negative votess none. Absent and not voting: Davenport. Mayor Carpenter declared that Resolution Ho, 5 had passed Rates and fees, clarified for Golf Courses Mayor Carpenter then referred to the previous action of the Council regarding fees at the Golf Courses and said the Golf Board of Control would like some clarification in the following instances: 1. Make the 18 -Hole Daily Green Fee at Fairview of $2,35 week days and $2.75 Sat.-San.-Fol. an all day fee. 2. Rescind the special rates to private concerns and clubs of $50.00 per day or $1 per person. This ,vas recommended in 1967 and has actually been in effect since that time. With reference to Item 1., Mayor Carpenter said it was being recommended that the payment of green: fees of $2.35 on week days or of $2.75 on Sat.- Swi. -Hol. at the Fairview Golf Course would be the amount pai for 16 holes of golf or more during a daily period. With reference to Item 2 „ Mayor Carpenter said that he had a copy of a letter on file which the Golf Board of Control had received from Mayor Smith whereby this special rate would be rescinded but for some reason there hadntt been any action on it and the Golf Board of Control would like to have the rate rescinded. He said it had been placed in effect during the early stages to encourage more play at the Purple Sage Golf Course and now it was not effective. It was moved by Councilman Banks, seconded by Councilman Martin, that the green fees for 18..Holes at the Fairview Golf Course of $2.35 on week days and $2.75 on Sat. - Sun. -Rol. be approved for either 18 -Holes or all day as recommended and that the special rates to private concerns and clubs at the purple Sage Go]S Course be rescinded. A vote was taken and the motion carried. Permission granted for Second Annual Treasure Valley Open on August 13, 14, 15, and 16, 1970 The following request from the Golf Board of Control was presented for the consideration of the Council: Grant permission to the Idaho Golf Angels to hold their Second Annual Treasure valley Open this year on August 2.3, 14, 15, and 16, 1970 at Purple Sage in conjunction with Hillcrest and Crane Creek Golf Courses. Mayor Carpenter reminded the Council of a previous action on April 21, 1969, it had been approved that the Idaho Golf Angels be granted permission to hold their professional - amateur tournament annually somewhere around the first of August and this request was for the specific dates on which the tournament was to be held. It was moved by Councilman Mccluskey, seconded by Councilman Banks, that the dates for the Second Annual Treasure valley Open be approved as requested. A rote was taken and the motion carried. Policy requested for charging of fees - dog kernel The following request for a set policy for the charging of a license fee for a dog kennel was pre- vented for the consideration of the Council: February 13, 1970 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: The Office of the Chief of Police Subject: License Fee for Dog Kennel Gentlemen: I need a policy set for the charging of a licanse fee for a dog kennel. Title 9, Chapter 3, Section 11 of the city code is very vague in this respect. Should it be a flat minimum fee of the $15.00 as indicated in the code or should it be on the per dog basis? Sincerely, /S/ Charles W. Astleford Chief of Police Also presented was the following portion of 9 -3 -11 of the City Code: "The owner of the dog kennel may, at his option, in lieu of an individual license for each dog, pr000re a kennel license to expire on April 30 next from the City Police Department upon application and payment of a minimum fee of fifteen ($15.00). Only dogs over six (6) months of age shall be considered." The Chief of Police told the Council that he thought the intent of the Ordinance had been for the licensing of a maximum number of dogs requested based upon established rates rather than the licensing of individual dogs with any doge under six (6) months of age not to be considered. The City Attorney informed the Council that his legal interpretation of the Ordinance, as written, would be that a $15.00 fee was all that could be charged and the Ordinance would need to be amended before 231 �l lany other fee could be charged. After some discussion, the Chief of Police was instructed to prepare and present his for an amendment to the existing Ordinance with regards to a Kennel fee. Ordinance on trailer homes discussed Mayor Carpenter referred to the previous consideration of an Ordinance for use of mobile homes in the City and he inquired of City Attorney Wayne E. Davis if Mr. aigray, Jr. had turned to him any informatic in this regard, Mr. Davis said not and Mayor Carpenter told the Cohmcil that he would contact Phi. 0igray again in this regard. Report by Councilman Martin - CATV Councilman Martin made the following report on CATV and his trip to Washington, D.C. in this regar °I've got a brief report on Cable Television. First, on my Washington trip, the primary purpose was to work with the GenGoE people in contacting our own Idaho Legislators and also Oregon Legislators with reference to the revision of the copy right law, at the Federal level, which hasn't been revised since 1909; and, it involves program copywriting i; in the broadcasting and in the cable television industry. We were able to see all of the Legislators we wanted to see and hope that we did some good. The new copywrite law, as originally drafted, is in the hands of the Senate Judiciary Committee and it is anticipated it will come out on the floor for debate about the 15th of March. What is's final form will be, I don't know, because it is going to be subjected to much discussion in committee and possible amendment, but the hope is, as far as cable television is concerned, that, in a compromise effort, giving some concessions to the broadcasting people, they will in turn gain what they want to gain in the final draft of the Bill. Before too long an in -depth report will be issued to the committee members of the fourteen cities regarding the cable television situation as it is now. Frankly, I'd just as soon talk to you about the end of the Vietnam war as I would this problem we seem to have here. I think you are all aware of the lawsuit the two Boise stations brought against the City of Boise contesting their right to grant a Franchise which was summarily dismissed from the Fourth District Court and has been appealed to the State Supreme Court; that is simply a delaying action to keep Cable Television out of this area as long as they possibly can. Now, that has been followed up by our good friend, Mr. Oenweiler, poise City Councilman and State Legislator, bringing in a Bill before Committee to put Cable Television under Public Utilities Commission regulation in the State of Idaho. I was over Saturday morning and testified before that Committee regarding our own fourteen City situation here and I don't know what will happen but it is 'hoped that the Bill will never be reported out of Committee. We had a similar Ball a year ago that was never re- ported out of Committee. So, as I see the situation now, we are still confronted by a continueing delay, and for how Long I do not know, because of the suit against the City of Boise which has been appealed to the State Supreme Court and because GenCoEls application for micro -wave licensing has never been granted by the FCC and because this copyright law revision is going to affect the whole picture and the micro -wave licensing. I don't think the FCC is going to move on that for anybody until we see what the Congress is going to do with the copyright law. So, actually how rapidly we are progressing, I don't know. Everybody who is working with us should get an 4 for effort, and that is about the best that I can say. In the meantime, I hope that our Committee will be patient, that is, the fourteen City Committee, and hold themselves together and I think that eventually, if they 1c, we will get this thing solved. When this in -depth report does come out to the Committee members, Mr. Keys and I will have copies of it and we can advise you further. That is about the ball of wax on Cable Television. 11 Applications for Bartender Ponats approved Applications for Bartender permits from Jesse F. Conatser and Florins W. Harris were presented for the consideration of the Council. The applications had been approved by the Chief of Police and were accompanied by a receipt from the Clerk for the required fees. It was moved by Councilman Partin, seconded by Councilman Dakan, that the applications for Bartender Permits be approved and the Permits be issued. A vote was taken and the motion carried. Bills for mid- February It was moved by Councilman Partin, seconded by Councilman. Keys, that the warrants for claims be approved as per list and filed in the City Clerk's office. Such warrants being in the totals as follows: Warrant Numbers 80 thru 118, General Fund: Warrant Numbers 62 thru 93, Water & Sewer Fund; Warrant Numbers 71 thru 125, Special Funds; A vote was taken and the motion carried. ---------------- ----- ---- ----- - --- $ 6,903.36 water Deposit Refund ------ e----- 5.15 Water ---------- --------- --- - - - - -- 1,086.05 Water, Capital ------------ - - - - -- 3,845 Treatment Plant ----- ------ - - - ---- 338.33 Water, General Office ------ - - ---- 65.78 Sewer Maintenance --------------- 151,66 Fire .................. �...__ - - - -_- 1,813.14 Cemetery --- --------- ------- - - - - -- 397.16 Street ----- ------- ---- -- --- --- - -- 6,987.44 Street, capital ------ --- -- ------- 1,571.15 Armory -- -- - ----------- ---- ------ 120.00 Irrigation ----- — ------------ — -- 787.51 It was moved by Councilman Banks, seconded by Councilman Dakan, that the meeting adjourn. A vote was taken and the motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 9:30 P. M. 4i �