HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-02-12city council minutesBook 17
Special Meeting
February 12, 1976
4:00 P.M.
Page 43
Mayor Pasley declared the City Council of the City of
Caldwell reconvened after a recess was called on February 9,
1976, due to a lack of a quorum to conduct the business at
hand.
The roll of the City Council was called with the following
members present: McCluskey, Olesen, Williams, Raymond, and
Banks. Absent: Bauman.
(RESOLUTION NO. 5 -76 - IRRIGATION ASSESSMENTS FOR 1976)
Councilman Banks sponsored Resolution 5 -76:
RESOLUTION FIXING ASSESSMENTS OF THE CALDWELL MUNICIPAL
IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR THE YEAR 1976.
Councilman Banks read the Resolution in full. It was then
MOVED by Banks, SECONDED by Raymond that Reelution No. 5 -76
pass.
The Mayor called for a roll call vote. Those voting yes:
Banks, McCluskey, Olesen, and Raymond. Those voting no:
Williams. Absent and not voting: Bauman.
MOTION CARRIED
The Mayor explained that there was 6,827 lots which at $10.10
would bring in $68,953. There was also 202 acres at $24.00 an
acre which would bring in $4,848. This would make a total
estimated income of $73,801. The Mayor further stated that
the expense budget was $85,645 with a cash balance of
approximately $6,000.
(FIREWORKS PERMIT DISCUSSION)
The Mayor explained to the City Council the procedure that
was outlined in the City Code for making an application to
sell safe or dangerous fireworks in the City of Caldwell. He
stated that he felt a fee should be charged for a permit and
that the person applying for the permit should have a written
statement from the people whose property the fireworks will
be sold on giving their permission for them to be sold there.
Some discussion followed among the City Council.
It was then MOVED by McCluskey, SECONDED by Banks that the
City Attorney be instructed to amend the section regarding
the sale of fireworks in the City Code to read that a fee of
$50.00 be charged for the permit and that the necessary
statement of permission from the lessor where the fireworks
were to be sold was presented to the City Clerk's office.
(BYRLE MORSE VARIANCE - RECONSIDERATION)
MOTION CARRIED
Councilman Banks stated that he would like to make the
suggestion that the City Council reconsider granting the
variance to Mr. Byrle Morse without curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
He further stated that he felt he had been mistaken in not
granting this variance as it was requested without making a
stipulation regarding the curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Much
discussion followed among the members of the City Council.
Book 17
Page 44
It was then MOVED by Banks, SECONDED by Raymond that
reconsideration be given to the variance request made by
Byrle Morse.
MOTI _CARRIED
MOVED by Banks, SECONDED by Raymond that the variance for
Mr. Byrle Morse be granted without the stipulatio., that curb,
gutter, and sidewalks be installed.
Councilman McCluskey called for the question and the Mayor
asked fora -vote as to who was in favor of calling the debate
closed.
MOTION CARRIED
The Mayor then asked for the vote regarding the motion as
stated. Those voting yes: Banks, McCluskey, Olesen, and
Raymond. Those voting no: Williams. Absent and not
voting: Bauman.
MOTION CARRIED
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned
at 4150.
APPROVED AS written
THIS 17 th BAY OF Fe b ru ary 1976.
Mayor
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
662 ,
City Clerk,, `
til lE',.71