HomeMy WebLinkAboutKing - Letter of Opposition_CompPlan_01.30.25To City Council Members
Proposed Comprehensive Plan for the City
of Caldwell
I have reviewed the proposed comprehensive plan currently before the City of Caldwell’s City
Counsel members. At first glance, it appears to be a well-thought-out effort, and I commend all
those involved in gathering and assembling this plan to restructure our existing comprehensive
plan. The need for such a plan is evident, given the substantial growth our city is experiencing, both
now and in the foreseeable future.
However, I have several concerns regarding the plan's lack of definition and specifics, particularly
concerning place types and the concept of Bonus Density.
Place Types/Bonus Density
The first concern is the lack of clear definitions and specifics regarding place types. What buffers
need to be in place between Residential types. Is it 100’, 150’ between each building type. There is
nothing in this plan that states any of these setbacks, again specifics.
Why do we even need to entertain Bonus Density? The density’s that is laid out in each of the place
types are more than adequate. What specific promises must a developer make to earn this bonus?
The absence of clear guidelines and criteria for a Bonus Density is troubling, and I believe that
without these specifics, the concept of Bonus Density should be excluded from the plan.
Transportation
Not many people in Caldwell ride the bus. Idaho is a state where people need a car to get around.
You are proposing a bus route along 10th Ave. which in large doesn’t even have sidewalks from
Fillmore Street South along 10th Ave. to Ustick Rd. Ustick Road, even with all its development, has
minimal sidewalks. If you put a bus route on those streets, where are these residents going to
walk? Currently, you take your life in your hands if you try to cross 10th Ave, near Laster. Is the City
ready to make a considerable investment prior to approving a bus route? Please consider this
before approving or allocating a bus route along these roads.
Caldwell’s Small-Town Feel
From the very first slide, the plan emphasizes maintaining Caldwell's small-town feel, which is a
sentiment echoed throughout several appendices where it states that preserving what we love
about Caldwell is paramount. Personally, I cherish the open spaces, horse pastures, and the overall
small-town atmosphere.
Unfortunately, the proposals outlined in the plan appear to contradict this goal unless they refer
solely to Neighborhood 1 types. The plan is overly broad and vague, potentially allowing for the
construction of high-rises and large apartment complexes, which are not in keeping with the small-
town character that residents value.
Call for Specifics
I apologize for not being more involved in the restructuring efforts for our city earlier, but I feel
compelled to speak up now before it is potentially too late. It is crucial to address the following:
• Place Types: What are the specific distances between R-1 and R-2. Why can’t we have cul-
de-sacs? Cul-de-sacs are quiet and a preferred location for a home.
• Community Centers: What do the residents of Caldwell envision for these centers? Why do
we have to entertain 3-5 story buildings? Again, what are the buffers to ensure the existing
homeowner isn’t getting a 5-story building in their back yard?
• Can we increase the setbacks distance beyond the existing right of way to ensure a quality
small town feel in these areas.
• The city has added a considerable amount of large apt complexes in the past several years.
While everyone understands the need for low-income housing, does Caldwell need to be a
hub for it? This type of housing will require more resources, police and fire. Where are these
called out in the plan? Who pays for these needed resources, the developer or the existing
citizens?
• With this vague proposal the increase in requests to review will certainly keep your
permitting office very busy.
In conclusion, while the proposed comprehensive plan for Caldwell has its merits, it falls short in
providing the necessary details and assurances that it will preserve the small-town character we all
cherish. I urge the City Council to address these concerns and to continue to involve the
community in getting down to specifics prior to accepting this proposal.
Thank you for considering my feedback. I look forward to seeing a plan that genuinely enhances our
community and preserves the unique qualities that make Caldwell a wonderful place to live.
Sincerely,
Shelley King
4513 Pine Mountain Ave.
Caldwell, Idaho 83607
208-866-5272