Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02.26.25_PZ Comm_Agenda_FINALP&Z Commission Minutes February 26, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SPECIAL WORKSHOP MINUTES Wednesday, February 26, 2025 @ 6:00 pm City Hall, Council Chambers, 205 S. 6th Ave, Caldwell, Idaho Chair Zamora called the meeting to order at: 6:00pm. ROLL CALL Present: ☒ Zamora ☐ Harman ☒ Boutros ☒ Larson ☐ Whitbeck Absent: ☐ Zamora ☒ Harman ☐ Boutros ☐ Larson ☒ Whitbeck SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS. Director Robin Collins and Senior Planner Joe Dodson presented Code Amendment package #2 by using a Power Point presentation. • Comp Plan was passed by City Council • No density bonus for R-1 zone • Purpose of Amendments • Article 1 o 10.02.02 (F) o 10.01.02 (3) deleted o 10.01.09 – attempts to resolve zoning designation issues – strengthen language o 10.01.10 (7) Administrative Decision - the scope of that role was expanded from the past meaning - more authority – does this lose accountability? ▪ Administrative Review by the Director or guidance of the director o Def 194 – “extraordinary impact” definition comes out of impact fees ▪ Call out Development Impact Fees and who determines and explain why it’s significant o Def 234 – Hearing Examiner role o Def 268 – infill development why was it changed? ▪ Qualify for flexibility in code ▪ 20 acres + should be enough land to comply with code ▪ Less than doesn’t allow for all code to apply ▪ Puts more responsibility on the developer to be more thoughtful o Def 359 – roads meant for parking strip area reword definition o Def 428 – why was the change made? ▪ Add word “ancillary” • Attorneys Review before Council • Article 2 o Noxious use – o 10.02.04 – reference to authority as to who determines compliance o 10.02.05 (D) – parking ▪ Reconsider rewriting so garage parking isn’t counted as total number of parking spaces for residential dwellings10/0 P&Z Commission Minutes February 26, 2025 o 10.02.05 – base parking on number of employees • Article 3 o Paragraph (F) o 10.03.13 (A-G) – unenforceable and out of place ▪ Move the types of design review in paragraph 3 before The General Provisions • Article 5-9 - Residential o Triplexes not allowed in R-3 because those will be along highways and major arterial roadways o 10.05.02 – Intent - regulations offer certainty for what is allowed – boundaries are pushed ▪ Land use table shows certainties and clarifies processes o 10.05.02 (3)(C) – included in old R-1 zone o 10.05.04(4) – setback measurements relationship between setback and easements ▪ Easement could be more restrictive o 5.04 table lot size ▪ RS-1 seems cramped based on setbacks (for conservation area) should say “R-1 dimensional standards” ▪ Clarify what that means o Admin – table 10.05.05 – density allowance – change title to reflect the dual usage • Article 6 – Commercial Use o Land Use Table ▪ P* will have specific use provisions that will have to be met o Bulk/Dimensional Standards ▪ Current code doesn’t have setback, height requirements ▪ Language still exists with some restrictions through specific use provisions o 06.05 Density Allowance ▪ Only zone where residential is permitted in mixed use is in highway corridor ▪ Must be rezoned to H-C o Industrial/Animal Slaughter house ▪ Allowed in M-2 with SUP but not in others • Article 7 – Manufacturing and Industrial Zoning • Article 8 – Urban Core o Apartment buildings are required to provide their own parking - full standards on their own site o 10.08.08-1 Paragraph A ▪ Appears to favor the brick-and-mortar building – allowed • Article 9 – Special Purpose o Airport District feels excessively restrictive o Jet aircraft mechanics = significant volume increase • Article 11 – Overlay Zoning • Article 12 – Specific Use P&Z Commission Minutes February 26, 2025 • Article 13 – Planned Unit Developments o Provides good structure and continuity • Parking Amendments • Landscaping, Buffering & Screening • Multi-Family o Related to 10.14.01(E) – not in addition to, but part of • Density Bonus Program 10.03.18 o Prefer using SUP heard by commission and/or council • Chapter 11 o How is it governed? Consistency is important ADJOURNMENT MOTION BY: ☐ Boutros ☐ Harman ☒ Larson ☐ Whitbeck ☐ Zamora SECONDED BY: ☒ Boutros ☐ Harman ☐ Larson ☐ Whitbeck ☐ Zamora to adjourn the meeting. MOTION CARRIED Meeting adjourned at: 9:50 pm APPROVAL OF MINUTES Respectfully submitted by Sarah Davis, Planning and Zoning, Planning Technician MINUTES APPROVED AND SIGNED BY CHAIRMAN ZAMORA: on the date noted below. Alex Zamora Chair, Planning & Zoning Commission ____________________ Date ATTEST: Robin Collins, Planning & Zoning Director