HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Responser
PUBLIC RESPONSE
ITEM
DATE
SUBMITTED BY
�j
154-16
Ti cy, ' 1
r
To Whom It May Concern,
My name is Betsy Hunsicker and I live at 216 E Pat Lane, Caldwell, ID 83607. Unfortunately, I am out of
town for work and unable to attend the Planning & Zoning meeting on 3113. Thank you for accepting this
letter in my absence.
am writing to express my opposition to the proposed rezoning of 5106 S. 1 oth Avenue, request ZON-18-02.
1 believe allowing this rezoning is inconsistent with the comprehensive master plan, it compromises the
livability for surrounding residents, benefits only the owner of the property in question, and raises significant
safety concerns. Not least of which is the safety of all the kids on the west side of 10th who are zoned for
Lewis & Clark elementary and already struggle for a good way across 10th avenue — this would make it far
worse and difficult to remedy.
Previously, this board denied a re -zoning request because the rationale for the request was to make the
property more marketable. I would contend that there is no change in the rationale for this request so there
should be no change in the board's decision. It is classic spot zoning, driven purely by the desire to sell the
property. We all appreciate the need and desire to sell the property; however, there is no justification for
putting the marketability of this property over the marketability and livability of every other home and
property that surrounds it.
The R-3 re -zoning is entirely inconsistent with the surrounding parcels and it is a deviation from the
comprehensive master plan, which specifies R-1 for this parcel. Additionally, the quantity (64) and type
(individually sold 4-plexes) raise serious questions about maintenance and management of the property as
well as concerns about the adequacy of loth avenue to absorb the vehicle traffic.
As for the C-2 re -zoning request, the comprehensive plan map identifies this area as R-1, and, although
there is apparently a "commercial overlay" along 10th that allows for C-1 or C-2 zoning, the proposed rezone
at this location seems very inconsistent with the objective of "orderly growth" that is called for in the
comprehensive plan. In my opinion, commercial development would be most orderly if done transitionally.
So rather than rezoning in the middle of the block surrounded by R-1 parcels, you would put a commercial
development next to the Maverick or the Walgreens, then next to that, and so on down the block. And there
are already commercially zoned parcels in those locations that are for sale, so it seems unnecessary to
rezone an R-1 parcel, which isn't adjacent to any other commercial parcel, when there are available C-1 and
C-2 zoned parcels on the same block. Additionally, the master plan identifies commercial development at
the NE corner of Homedale and 10'h, so if we needed to rezone in order to add commercial development, it
seems that would be the more appropriate location.
There are many other concerns related to traffic, noise, safety, the quality of the development and I will let
my neighbors will speak to those in much more detail.
Thank you.
Q��l
C
of alaa�
���
a tow
CALDWELL
4
"ity Clerk's Office
411 Blaine Street
Caldwell, ID 83605
Phone: (208) 455-4656
Fax: (208) 455-3003
Request for Public Records
The City of Caldwell complies with the Idaho Public Records Act (Idaho Code Title 74, Chapter 1) regarding
appropriate time limitations for public record requests. By law, information gained through this request cannot
be used for the purpose of compiling a mailing list or telephone list without obtaining permission from each
individual.
N j,�,t � 4 .r G ,#, C/;, �'
Time �
�
.Ptrett AgLdre l
j L.� n
Fax
'ty State
Phous
Signat a
-mail
k
/ofat,-/r' e
Informs ion Reauested: (Please be as detailed as possible)
I request to examine [ ] or copy [ ] the following records:
A?), �r
ResultslFindings: (Office use only)
Verbal Response Numbe of Pages Date Finished Time Requir d F
City Attorney Approval/Comments:
Staff Providing Information: Staff Comments: ~�
Information
Email
Fax
Mail Service
Requestor Pick U
delivered b
— —
RZ-Z
r
0 o 76
QUITCLAIM DEED
FOR VALUE RIOVED Mike F. Caylsr aka Michael P Gayler and
L. Joan Cayler aka Joan L. Csyler
do hereby eenveY, rdCAae, tendae sod forever quit chin►
Unto Mike P. Cayler and L. Joan Caylar
whose&Mftasis 5222 S. l0th Ave. Caldwell, ID 83605
the tollowWS described powdses, to -wit:
Part of lot 20 of a Plat of ONWARD fiR10 l'S, on file In PIat book 2 at page 38 in the
Office of the County Recorder of Canyon County, Idaho and is Bore particularly
described as follower
Commencing at theNortheast corner of Lot 20 orchard Hsightgr_thence South 89°03' _
Peat a distance of 233 feat to the Real Point of 8a8innio8s.. thence continue South
89.03' Meat along the North boundary of said Lot-20. a -distance of 40 foatr thane_.
South 0.21' Mast a distance of 447.99 feett thence South 89'03' gast 423 feett tl;@tCCr
North 0*211 fast 100 feett thence South 89003 East 210 feef to a point in the Bast
boundary line of Lot 20t thence North 0°21' Best 50.15 feet` among the Bast boundary
tine of Lot 201 thanes South $9103' (last 233 feats thence North 0021' Nast 208 faeer
to the Point of 8e81nning.
Dead Restriction Clause, The Coaveyanre of the above described tract is subject
to the restrictions that any building thereon is to be for residantial purposes and _
that aueb residence must be of a value of not Seas than $12.00b.00 including the
Coat of a well for domaetic purposes,' if any. ~-
.
-
—••
� A SJ7
togrrdw With tlttsir apportrnstttc.
co
-c
-
Daoed: 7
_ C=
m
m
M ZI I—
y
a 0
�^
m
a s~v
N
a GO
w
STA'M C!r IDAHO. COMIT OF
On d6 7 dry of /if+9rif . ig q r
Wore tm t nouuy pMc in ■rd Cos raid State, pas mtly
apreaed --
known to roe to bs the Pawn who trelee
mWDW to tMe wkbb iront ms. and adawwtedped to
ow tint eaxcated do amre.
rT
mmwv Prb k ... y
Comm Borpba
PIONEER TmE COMPANY
423 So. KinAW1 OF CANYON COUNTY 100 - loth Ave, South
CildwelL Idaho 83605 Nampa, Idaho 83651
Page 1 of 1
oymml7 a to PM
�_3