HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning & ZoningI Q'
PLANNING AND ZONING
ITEM DATE STiBMITTED BY
?z.l L_Z-4 A,+o f?-'I
lz'z- cfrnl'T1!^fd'aLt L,'8-6b 5a# fu^+rd
?2. S eg?z't/v,u^* d'u*f b -n- oo Uol 6nuol
Pz-4 d^
4> chr,u,l0 t b'b-a Irz
?z'5 ffltfite-s bQ
U-n'6D 1-[ L-zro P+z
o
Findings of Fact - Motion: Commissioner Archuleta. Second: Commissioner Teraberry. Accept the general
facts outlined in the staff report as Findings of Fact and include Exhibits PR-l and PR-2. Passed: Unanimous roll
call vote.
Conclusions of Law - Motion: Commissioner Teraberry. Second: Commissioner Archuleta. The Commission
has the authority to hear this case and recommend approval or denial; public notice requirements were met; and
the hearing was conducted within the guidelines of Idaho Code and City ordinances. Passed: Unanimous roll call
vote.
Recommendation to City Council - Motion: Commissioner Teraberry. Second: Commissioner Archuleta.
Approve Case No. ANN-33-00. Passed: Unanimous roll call vote.
Public Hearing Closed - Chairman Blacker closed the public hearing.
a
C.
*************************** * *** * ** ** * * ******* ** * * *** * *** * r(* **r.***** **** * *** * * *** * *
To hear concurently Case Nos. ANN-32-00 and SUB-50P-00, a request by Crestline Development, LC
and Heartland Development, LLC to annex approximately 150 acres into the City as an R-l (Single-
Family Resideutial) zone, and preliminary plat approval of Colonial Heights Subdivision, a three-phased
development, which consists of 108 residential and 5 common-area lots and covers approximately 29
acres of the aforementioned 150 acres. A portion of the subdivision site abuts the south side of Highway
20/26, and a portion abuts the east side of KCID Road.
Testimony -
Linda James presented the staffreport and Exhibit A-6, the annexation map.
Testiffing in favor were: Rita Earl, Applicant's Representative, and Scott Stanfreld, ,A,pplicant's Engineer
Carol Grassl signed up as neutral with questions.
Public Testimony Closed {hairman Blackgr closed public testimony.
Comprehensive Plan Analysis on Case No. ANN-32-00 - Motion: Commissioner Teraberry. Second:
Commissioner Archuleta. The request is in compliance with the Land Use Goal. Passed: Unanimous roll call
vote.
Findings of Fact on Case No. ANN-32-00 - Motion: Commissioner Archuleta. Second: Commissioner
Teraberry. Accept the general facts outlined in the staff report as Findings of Fact and include Exhibit A-6.
Passed: Unanimous roll call vote.
Conclusions of Law on Case No. AITIN-32-00 - Motion: Commissioner Archuleta. Second: Commissioner
Teraberry. The Commission has the authority to hear this case and recommend approval or denial; public notice
requirements were met; and the hearing was conducted within the guidelines of Idaho Code and City ordinances.
Passed: Unanimous roll call vote.
Recommendation to City Council on Case No. AlrlN-32-00 - Motion: Commissioner Teraberry. Second:
Commissiouer Archuleta. Approve Case No. ANN-32-00. Passed: Unanimous roll call vote.
Comprehensive Plan Analysis on Case No. SUB-50P-00 - Motion: Commissioner Archuleta. Second:
Commissioner Teraberry. The request is in corrpliance with the Comprehensive Plan corrponents as follows:
Agricultural - Policy 3; Residential Categories - Policies 3, 6, g, 10, 13 and 15; Utilities - Policies 1,2, and 3;
Transportation - Policy 7; Urban Storm Runoff - Policies I and 2; Housing - Policies l, 2, arrd 3; Community
Design - Policies 7 and 8. Passed: Unanimous roll call vote.
Findings of Fact on Case No. SIJB-50P -00 - Motion: Commissioner Teraberry. Second: Comrnissioner
Archuleta. Accept the general facts outlined in the staff report as Findings of Fact and include the following facts
from testimony: Scott Stanfield stated that the Applicant's will undertake a taffic study in the near future; the
{z'5
P & Z Miuutes of June 8, 2000
o o
Applicants' engineer will work with the City Engineer regarding the relocation of the pressrue sewer line from
Lakey's mobile horne park; sidewalks along Highway 20/26 may or rnay not be permitted by the Idaho
Transportation Deparfrnent. Passed: Unanimous roll call vote.
Conclusions of Law on Case No. SIIB-50P -00 - Motion: Commissioner Teraberry. Second: Commissioner
Archuleta. The Commission has the authority to hear this case and recommend approval or denial; public notice
requirements were met; and the hearing was conducted within the guidelines of Idaho Code and City ordinances.
Passed: Unanimous roll call vote.
Recommendation to City Council on Case No. SLIB-50P-00 - Motion: Commissioner Teraberry. Second:
Commissioner Archuleta. Approve Case No. SUB-50P-00 with the standard conditions outlined in the staff
report. Passed: Unanimous roll call vote.
Public Hearing Closed -Chairman Blacker closed the public hearing.
******************rr***rr?tr(rtrrr<**rrr(r(**********************************r.rrrrr.it**********
\rII.Planning Issues- The hearing chamber is going to be renovated for use as office space so hearings beginning in
August will be held in the Board of County Commissioners' chambers at the Courthouse, however Thursday
evenings are not available. The Commission members agreed to hold the fust hearing of the month on Tuesday.
\IItr. Adjournment - Chairman Blacker adjoumed the meeting at approximately 8:45 p.m.
MINUTES APPROVED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS, AND SIGNED BY CHAIRMAN BLACKE& AT A
REGULARLY SC}IEDULED MEETING HELD JULY 11,2000.
i,/n^ATTEST:
Jim Blacker Community Director
P & Z Minutes of June 8, 2000
o
BET'ORE TIIE PLANMNG AND ZONING COMMISSION
CITY OF' CALDWELL, IDAHO
o
IN TIIE MATTER OF TIIE
APPLICATION OF' CRESTLINE
DEVELOPMENT, LC AND IMARTLAND
DEVELOPMENT, LLC FOR APPROVAL
TO AI\I\EX APPROXIMATELY 150
ACRES INTO TIIE CITY AS AN R.l ZONE
AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
PLAT APPROVAL OF COLONIAL
HEIGIITS
CASE NOs. AllN-32-00 AND SUB-50P-00,
COT]RSE OF PROCEEDINGS, GEI\IERAL
F'ACTS, TESTIMONY, APPLICABLE LEGAL
STANDARDS, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ANALYSTS, tr'r\DINGS OF tr'ACT,
CONCLUSTONS OF LAW, AND
RECOMMEI\DATION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
I COURSE OF'PROCEEDINGS
1.1 The Caldwell Community Development Department issued a notice of public hearing on applications
ANN-32-00 and SUB-50P-00 (Colonial Heights Subdivision) to be held before the Planning and Zoning
Commission on June 8, 2000. Public notice requirements set forth in Idaho Code, Chapter 65, Local
Planning Act, were met. On May 23,2000 notice was published in the Idaho-Press Tribune; on May 19,
2000 notice was mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site and to all political
subdivisions providing services to the City of Caldwell; and, on June 1, 2000 notice was posted at the site.
1.2 Files and exhibits relative to this application are available for review in the Community Development
Department, Caldwell City Hall, and were available for review at the hearing.
U GENERAL T'ACTS
2.t APPLICANT (S): Crestline Development, LC and Heartland Development, LLC, 228 E. P1aza, PMB
207,Eagle,ID. 83616
2.2 OWNER (S): Charlie and Emaline Nelson, Rt. l, Box 422,Marsing,ID 83639
2.3 PROPOSAL: The Applicants requested concurrent approval to annex approximately 150 acres into the
City as an R-1 (Single Family Residential) zone and for preliminary subdivision plat approval of Colonial
Heights Subdivision, which consists of 108 residential and 5 common-area lots platted on approximately
29 acres of the aforementioned 150 acres. As a part of the annexation request, the Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map would be amended from an Agricultural designation to an R-l designation, and would be
included in the next available update of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
The Applicants' narrative noted the following: the site is adjacent to the City; it is in close proximity to
public services; the proximity to Interstate 84 makes the site an attractive setting for residential uses; it is
accessible to Highway 20126 and the rightof-way is included in the legal description; the R-l zone
classification will provide for a low density, single-family living area.
\L,A
2.3.t
2.4
2.5
2.6
5.7
2.8
Phase # Lots
orvgrOpuErvr tgnurp: Subdivision ordinance N". lt Section ll-02-o4,Subsections C and
D set forth requirements for preliminary plat approval of phased developments. The Applicant proposes 3
phases as follows: (R=esidential; C:common-area)
1
2
J
40w4c
32R
36 R/l C
Final Plat Application
July,200l
July,2002
July,2003
108 R/5 C
LOCATION: A portion of the subdivision site abuts the south side of Highway 20/26 and a portion abuts
the east side of KCID Road.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of the NW % of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 2 West, Boise
Meridian, Caldwell, Canyon County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the
NW corner of said NW % (Section corner corlmon to Sections 24, 19, 30 and 25) said corner
monumented with a 3 inch diameter brass disk; Thence S. 0o 37' 12" W., a distance oOf 627.88 feet along
the westerly boundary of said NW % to the POINT OF BEGINNING, said point monumented with a 5/8
inch diameter iron pin; Thence continuing S. 0o 37' 12" W., a distance of 2021.96 feet along the westerly
boundary of aid NW t/q to the SW comer of said NW % (West Yo comer) said corner monumented with a 3
inch diameter brass disk; Thence S. 89o 46' 45" E., a distance of 2605.79 feet along the southerly
boundary of said NW % to the SE corner of said NW % (Center Yo corner) said comer monumented with a
5/8 inch diameter iron pin; Thence N. 0o 22' 27" 8., a distance of 2602.51 feet along the easterly
boundary of said NW % to a point on the southerly right of way of U.S.Highway 20-26 (Franklin Road);
Thence N. 89" 50'21" W., a distance of 1840.85 feet along the southerly right of way of said U.S.
Highway 20-26 and parallel with the northerly boundary of said NW % to a point; Thence S. 0o 37' 12"
W., a distance of 577.88 feet parallel with the westerly boundary of said NW % to a point; Thence N. 89"
50'21" W., adistanceof 753.79 feetparallelwiththenortherlyboundaryof saidNW %tothePOINTOF
BEGINNING. This parcel contains 145.269 acres more or less.
NATURAL RESOURCES AND HAZARDOUS AREAS: The subdivision project site is not within the
vicinity of the Boise River or Indian Creek, and is not within a floodplain. However, the Solomon Drain
and Bolton Lateral bisect portions of the annexation area (outside the plat) in two places.
LAND USE: The site is zoned County Agricultural; zoning to the north, east and south is County
Agricultural. Zoning directly west is County Ag; catty comer southwesterly is City R-2 (ANN-27-00,
Harshman).
2.9 COMPREHENSIVEPLANDESIGNATION:Agricultural
2.9.t The Comprehensive Plan defines Agricultural as "suitable primarily for the preservation of existing
farmland essential to the economic welfare of the community and region. Activities related to agriculture
and livestock production and the development of single-family homes on minimum 5 acre lots are
appropriate."
The Comprehensive Plan Map also constitutes the present Area of City Impact Map. There are several
flaws that relate to the Agricultural designations shown on this Map. 1) The City does not have an
Agricultural zone classification within the corporate boundaries. This means that any annexation of land
designated as Agricultural cannot actually be brought into the City as an Agricultural zone because this
zone classification does not exist. Any land annexed into the City can only be brought in under a
classified zone that actually exists. 2) Agricultural policies I and 2 outlined in the Comprehensive Plan
conflict with each other. Policy I notes that "the continuation of farming in places within the lmpact
Area which are awaiting urbanization will be assisted in any way possible." Policy 3 notes that "support
is to be given to the County's Comprehensive Plan, which encourages urbanization within Areas of City
Impact." Impact area boundaries should include only those areas that are realistically slated for
2.9.2
O
cultural area is truly meant toQprot".ted, it should never be includeddevelopment and growth. If an agricultural area is truly n
in Impact boundaries. City officials and Planning and Zoning Commission members are aware of the
illogicalness of the Agricultural designation. The Community Development Department, as a part of their
goals for the new FY, has been directed to initiate and carryout the process of amending the
Comprehensive Plan Map and Area of City Impact boundaries by removing Agricultural designations.
The amendment to the Impact boundaries received final approval from the Canyon County Board of
Commissioners on May 31,2000.
2.9.3 As noted earlier, the approximately 150 acres abuts the eastern side of the City's boundary, which is
zoned R-2. The annexation request for the 150 acres as an R-l zone is a natural outward progression of
current zoning in other areas in Caldwell.
2.10 AREA OF CITY IMPACT: The project site is within the Area of City Impact, and Canyon County
Development Services was notified of the request through mailing of the public hearing notice on May
19,2000 and June 16,2000.
2.II PUBLICFACILITIES:
2.11.1 Schools - Caldwell and Vallilue School Districts were notified of the request through mailing of the
public hearing notice on May 19,2000 and June 16,2000.
2.11.2 Fire Protection - The City's Fire Marshal noted in a memorandum dated June 1, 2000 reiterated standard
construction and design requirements outlined in the Subdivision Ordinance, and addressed the following:
l) access for each phase will be considered solely on its own egress and ingress capabilities; 2) for Phase
2 a secondary access roadway will be required to connect to Highway 20126 and this access (known as
Amhurst Avenue on the plat) is to connect with 20126 through Lol29; and 3) he is in the process of
reviewing street names to determine acceptance.
2.11.3 Water/Sewer - Notes I and 2 of the Development Data on the preliminary plat indicate that water and
sewer systems will be provided by the City's systems. Gordon Law noted that water/sewer systems are to
be dedicated to the City, and the providing of sewer and water service, sizing of mains, providing of
easements, frontage construction and off site construction are to be decided during review of
improvement plans. This includes the removal and re-routing of the pressure sewer line from Lakey's
mobile home park.
2.11.4 krigation - The proposed site is within the jurisdiction of Pioneer Irrigation District. Item 5 of
Development Data on the plat notes that a pressure irrigation system approved by Pioneer will be
installed. Gordon Law noted that the development is to include a non-potable pressure irrigation system
and that the system is to be designed and approved by Pioneer Irrigation Diskict. The District is to
submit a letter of approval before final plats are approved. Mr. Law also requires the developers to
ascertain from Pioneer all existing upstream drainage rights and downstream irrigation rights that need to
be maintained across the properfy. The District is to submit a letter indicating their concurrence with the
design and facilities that preserve these existing rights.
2.11.5 Stormwater - Item 4 of Development Data on the preliminary plat indicates that storm water runoff will
be detained on site for a full 25-year and will be designed to City standards. Gordon Law noted that the
disposal of stormwater drainage is to be in accordance with the City's Stormwater Management Policy.
The stormwater detention basins are to be placed in common lots or easements on private lots and a note
is to be placed on the final plat that areas designated as conrmon areas are to be operated and maintained
by the homeowners' association.
2.11.6 Easements - Notes I and2 of the preliminary plat propose specific easements, which are in keeping with
the Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Gordon Law noted that the easements shown on the preliminary
plat are in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance and that easements for sewer lines should be at
least 20 feet in width.
2,1T.7
2.t2
Rights-of-W", - nn?.w noted that the dedication of the rightay along Franklin (75 foot required)
and KCID (30-foot half required) shown on the preliminary plat are consistent with City Standards.
TRANSPORTATION: Access to the Phase I will be from one point along the east side of KCID Road.
There are four streets planned for future extension; two in Phase 2 and one in Phase 3 (all eastward), and
one in Phase 1 to the south. Item 3 of Development Data on the plat notes that road improvements will
meet the City's standards and specifications. Gordon Law noted the following: 1) The Idaho
Transportation Department is to approve all plans and construction in right-of-way of Franklin Road and
ITD is to determine the appropriate street section for Franklin; 2) KCID Road is operated by Canyon
Highway District {14. The District's approval is required for all plans and construction in the right-of-way
of KCID Road; 3) Street side improvements are required in the public right-of-way adjacent to the
property, including Franklin Road and KCID Road; 4) This development does not warrant a traffic study;
however, given anticipated multiple developments in this area, the developers of this subdivision may be
asked to participate in a traffic study in the near future.
2.12.1 Airport - Gordon Law noted that the site does not lie within the low-level glide path at either end of the
mnway. Fly-in and fly-out rotations do track over the site but aircraft elevations should be high enough
to attenuate nose effects substantially. However, the Master Plan outlines an extension of the existing
runway and the servicing of larger aircraft, which may cause some overly sensitive residents to object to
aircraft noise. The Engineering Department recommends that passive measures to limits residents' ability
to challenge existing and planned uses at the Airport.
2.13 PARKS. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE: The preliminary plat identifies 2 common-area/detention
islands at the entrance to Colonial Drive, and a common area detention lot, known as Lot 29 of BlockZ.
2.14 HISTORIC AREAS: This property is not within the City's area of historic significance.
2.ts HOUSING: If approved, the subdivision will provide 108 residential lots, with an average lot size of
7255 square feet. Single-family houses are permitted in an R-l zone; duplexes may be permitted with
approval of a special use permit. Density is noted under Item 8 of Development Data on the plat as 3.70
lots per acre. Gordon Law requested that no lot is to take direct access off of Franklin and KCID Road.
2.16 COMMUMTY DESIGN: Phase 1 of the proposed subdivision will be accessed by Colonial Drive, which
interconnects with KCID Road. There is no information noted on the plat that the two common-area
islands, and detention area lot, will be landscaped. Gordon Law requested that the final plat include a
notation that all areas designated as common areas are to be operated and maintained by the homeowners'
association.
III TESTIMOI\TY
3.1 Linda James presented the staff report and Exhibit A-6, a copy of the annexation map identifoing the
exact location ofthe site.
3.2
Scott Stanfield, Applicants' representative, testified in favor and stated the following: he is generally in
agreement with Gordon Law's conditions; a traffic study will be undertaken at the Applicants' expense
J.J
Rita Earl, Applicants' representative, testified in favor and stated the following: this request is a step-
down zoning going eastward from Light Industrial to R-3 (High-Density Residential) and R-2 (Medium-
Density Residential), across KCID on the east to this request for R-l (Single-Family Residential); this is a
three-phase subdivision; the Vallivue School District was sent a letter and a copy of the preliminary plat,
explaining how the development will occur; the District did not respond to the information submitted to
them; she and other staff of Earl and Associates met with the Fire Marshal regarding ingress/egress points
and another temporary vehicular access point will be provided across Lot 13, Block 7 onto KCID Road;
the temporary access will be all-weather surface and of a width acceptable to the Fire Marshal; when
another access point is available in a later phase, the temporary access will be removed and the 1ot will be
returned to a buildable lot.
for the anticipated t" growth along this corridor; because o0r"ru, unknowns he would like to work
with Gordon Law to resolve the issue or re-routing the pressure sewer line from Lakey's mobile home
park; developments along KCID Road and Highway 20126 also have to meet the requirements of the
Idaho Transportation Department, who may or may not permit sidewalks; he would like to leave this
requirement open in order to work with all of the applicable highway agencies to determine what can or
cannot be done along Highway 20126; the preliminary plat shows four stub streets that will eventually
provide ingress/egress for the subdivision; the time line for these stub streets to be extended is conceptual
but he believes that within the next six months they will be in; as each phase is platted the stub outs will
have temporary turn-arounds; KCID and Highway 20126 can handle the traffic generated by the 108
residential lots; there will be a temporary access to KCID as well as the permanent access shown as
Colonial Drive and this temporary access will remain until the entire skeet system is in.
Carol Grassl, lt47l Highway 20126, signed in as neukal and noted that the annexation would come
within 60 feet of their back door; they realize progress is coming but wonders what the impact will be on
the school districts.
IV APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS
3.4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
City of Caldwell Zoning Ordinance No. 1451, as amended
City of Caldwell Comprehensive Plan, as amended
City of Caldwell Subdivision Ordinance No. 1758, as amended
Idaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Local Planning Act
Idaho Code, Title 50, Chapter 2, Section 50-222 Municipal Corporations, regarding annexation
V COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS ON CASE NO. ANN-32-OO
5.1 The request is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan as follows: B. Land Use - Goal: "To manage
growth by channeling it into orderly community development and to establish policies that will serve as a
basis for decision making by officials related to the development and appropriate use of land in
Caldwell." Housing - Policy 1. "The City shall provide, through its authority to establish zoning
districts, a mixture of residential districts that will provide for a diversity of housing types at varied
locations throughout the community." Policy 2. "The location of residential zoning districts and the type
of housing shall be fully integrated with the land use, transportation and public facilities components of
the Comprehensive Plan."
VI FINDNGS OF FACT ON CASE NO. ANN-32-OO
6.r Accept the general facts outlined in the staff report as Findings of Fact and include Exhibit A-6, a copy of
a map showing the location of the annexation area.
VII CONCLUSIONS OF'LAW ON CASE NO. ANN-32-OO
7.t The Planning and Zoning Commission has the authority to hear this request and to recommend to the
Mayor and City Council that it is approved or denied; the hearing was legally noticed and posted, and was
held under the requirements of applicable Idaho Codes and City ordinances.
VIII RECOMMENDATION ON CASE NO. ANN-32-OO
8.1 Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Planning andZoning Commission hereby
recommends to the Mayor and City Council that Case No. ANN-32-00, a request by Crestline
Development, LC and Heartland Development, LLC to annex into the City of Caldwell approximately
150 acres as an R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zone, is approved.
IX COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS ON CASE NO. SUB-sOP-OO
The request is in compliance with the following Comprehensive Plan components: Agricultural - Policy
3. Support will be given to Canyon County's Comprehensive Plan, which encourages urbanization within
9.1
"Areas of City *;' and protective of Canyon County's r.t*"nant agricultural industry outside
those areas." Residential - Policy 3. "New Residential development will be encouraged to assure safe,
convenient, and appealing housing." Policy 6. Adequate transition will be provided between residential
uses and industrial, commercial, and public areas." Policy 9. "New streets will be designed to enhance
residential districts and protect such neighborhoods from high traffic volumes and related impacts."
Policy 10. "New residential lots will not be platted to front artenal and sub-arterial streets and will be
discouraged from fronting on collector sheets." Policy 15. "Existing areas, where mixed residential,
commercial and industrial uses occur, will be encouraged to evolve into distinct districts, by the
development and implementation of official plans." Utilities - Policy 1. "To meet the needs of citizens
for water and sewer service through systems designed for the local area. . .." Policy 2. "To develop and
extend utility systems in such a way as to further the land use and other policies of this Plan and an
orderly expansion of the City. . . ." Policy 3. "To require new subdivisions to have public water and sewer
systems installed as a part of their initial development...." fJrban Storm Runoff - Policy 1. "To
maintain the runoff rate of new developments to that of the undeveloped condition." Transportation -
Policy 7. "To permit regional and local passenger and truck traffic to move safely and quickly through
the community." Housing - Policy 3. "The City shall provide building inspection and code enforcement
services as a means to maintain safe, quality housing in attractive residential neighborhoods."
Community Design - "Policy 7. "New neighborhoods should be laid out with opportunities for street
interconnection and adequate access to adjoining neighborhoods but without creating heavy traffic flows
through residential districts." Policy 8. "New residential development will not face arterial streets."
X FINDINGS OF T'ACT ON CASE NO. SUB-sOP-OO
10.1 Accept the general facts outlined in the staff report as Findings of Fact and include the following facts
taken from testimony: the Applicants will undertake a traffic study of this area in the near future; the
Applicants' engineer will work with the City Engineer regarding the relocation of the pressure sewer line
from Lakey's mobile home park; sidewalks along Highway 20126 may or may not be permitted by the
Idaho Transportation Department.
XI CONCLUSIONS OF'LAW ON CASE NO. SUB-sOP.OO
11.1 The Planning and Zoning Commission has the authority to hear this request and to recommend to the
Mayor and City Council that it is approved or denied; the hearing was legally noticed and posted, and was
held under the requirements of applicable Idaho Codes and City ordinances.
XII RECOMMENDATION ON CASE NO. SUB-sOP-OO
12.1 Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends that Case No. SUB-50P-00 (Colonial Heights), a request by Crestline Development, LC and
Heartland Development,LLc for preliminary subdivision plat approval to develop 108 buildable lots, two
corlmon-area island lots, and one detention lot is approved with the following conditions:
t2.2 Pursuant to Idaho Code 50-1316, no lot shall be offered for sale or sold until the final plat has been
approved and recorded.
12.3 No building permits shall be accepted for processing until the final plat has been approved and recorded.
12.4 Building permits shall be issued in compliance with Subdivision Ordinance No. 1758, Section lI-02-06,
Subsection M.
t2.s As a part of final plat application Applicants shall submit written verification from Pioneer krigation that
the District has no objection to the final plat application.
12.6 Preliminary plat approval, including the development schedule, shall remain valid for 12 months
following the signing of the Order of Decision, as set forth in Section ll-02-04, Subsection (6) C of
Subdivision Ordinance No. 1758.
o o
12.7 In accordance with the requirements of Section l1-02-04, Subsection 7, Subdivision Ordinance No. 1758,
the Applicants have the option to file an application for final plat approval prior to commencing
construction of improvements; or, with approval of the City Engineer, the Applicants may commence
construction of improvements before requesting final plat approval.
12.8 All requirements placed on the preliminary plat by agencies having approval authority shall be met prior
to submitting a request for final plat approval, or a financial guarantee for completion of work shall be
submitted in compliance with Section ll-02-04, Subsection 7, Subdivision Ordinance No' 1758.
CASE NOS. ANN-32-OO AND SUB-sOP-OO WERE HEARD BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEMBERS AT A PUBLIC HEARING HELD JUNE 8, 2OOO.
WRITTEN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS WERE
ADMIMSTRATryELY APPROVED AND SIGNED BY CHAIRMAN JIM BLACKER ON THE DATE
NOTED BELOW.
C-zc-oa,ATTEST:
Jim Blacker Date
Community Director
oo
PUBLIC HEARING COMMENT SHEET
(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)
NAME:H"-""
STREET ADDRESS:
CIry/STATEIZIP:S B (B6o
Check the appropriate line:
Appl icant or Representative_
ln favor/
wish to speak_
do not wish to speak_
Neutral/
wish to speak-lz'
do not wish to speak_
Opposed/
wish to speak_
do not wish to speak_
Written comments may be attached to this form or you may write them in below.
\Id
b
6-.
NAME OF CASE BEING HEARD: ANn\ _J ..}.6 c}
oo
PUBLIC HEARTNG COMMENT SHEET
(PLEASE PRTNT CLEARLY)
NAME: R Se 1>t r-O
STREET 3tr
CIry/STATEIZIP
Applicant or Representative /
ln favor/
l-l-
Check the appropriate line
g utb-*
wish to speak
do not wish toEJak ,X
written comments may be attached to this form or you may write them in below
Neutral/
wish to speak
do not wish toEEak_
Opposed/
wish to speak
do not wish toEEk_
w
1/
NAME OF CASE BETNG HEARD,
ta
PUBLIC HEARING COMMENT SHEET
(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)
NAME: Q,=* E-€,1-
STREET ADDRESS Qt cl 4.4.-,, at ,A-<f
CIffiSTATEIZIP O-a t4,,,,)l f,h
NAME OF CASE BEING H
-o6
Sct $- 5of-oo
Check the appropriate line:
Appl icant or Representative{
ln favor/
wish to speak_
do not wish to speak_
Neutral/
wish to speak_
do not wish to speak_
Opposed/
wish to speak_
do not wish to speak_
Written comments may be attached to this form or you may write them in below
\qL'