HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning & Zoninga)
ANNING AND ZONINGPL
ITEM DATE SUBMITTED BY
(
b-
-o tZo')
o
CALDWELL PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE HEARING EXAMINER
MINUTES
June 6,2002
Call to Order - Hearing Examiner, M. Jerome Mapp, opened the meeting for the
public hearings at 7:00 p.m. and outlined the public hearing procedures.
ll. Review of Proceedings - Mr. Mapp outlined the public hearing procedures.
Members Present: Steve Hasson, Community Development Director, Debbie Geyer
and Ben Weymouth (Assistant City Engineer).
ll!. Hearings
A. Case No. SUP-162-02, a request by Albino Ortega for special use permit
approval of a dance hall at 3623 Lake Avenue (El Rey). The site is located in a
C-3 (Service Commercial) zone.
Testimony:
Due to a conflict of interest, Steve Hasson stated that the hearing had been
rescheduled before the Planning & Zoning Commission. The hearing would be held
at the Caldwell Police Department Community Room on Thursday, June 20, at7:OO
p.m.
Public Hearing Closed: Mr. Mapp closed the public hearing
B. To hear concurrently, Case Nos. SUB-70P-02 and VAR-25-02, a request by
Renny Wylie for preliminary plat approval of Clearwater Plaza Subdivision, which
consists of 5 commercial lots on 19.35 acres. ln addition, a request for a
variance on the size of signage allowable on the site. The site abuts the eastern
boundary of the Walmart Supercenter at 5108 E Cleveland Blvd. and is zoned C-
3 (Service Commercial).
Testimony:
Steve Hasson, Community Development Director, presented the staff report.
Renny Wylie, Applicant, testified in favor of the application.
NOTE: See Order of Decision for complete testimony or contact Community
Development Department for audio tapes of the hearing.
Public Testimony Closed: Mr. Mapp closed the testimony.
Variance Procedure: Mr. Mapp answered true to allflve variance criteria..
Comprehensive Plan Analysis: Mr. Mapp found that the request was applicable to
the following Comprehensive Plan components: Property Rights - Goal, Objective B,
and Policy 1; School Facilities and Transportation - Goal and Policy 1; Economic
Development - Goal; Land Use - Goal, Objectives A and C; Natural Resources -Goal, Objectives A and C, and Policy 1; Public Services, Utilities and Facilities -
o
!.
?/'s
oo
Goal, Objectives A, B, C, D and Policies 1,2,3,5, and 7; Transportation - Goal,
Objectives A and B, Policies 1,2,3 and 5; Hazardous Areas Component - Goal,
Objectives A & B, and Policy 2; Recreation - Goal, Objective A, and Policy 3;
CommunityDesign-Goal, ObjectivesA, B, C, D, E, and G, Policies 1,2,3,5' 6' 8'
9, 10, and 11.
Findings of Fact on Case No. VAR-25-02: The Hearing Examiner accepted the
general facts outlined in the staff report as well as the fact that all five variance
criteria were met.
Conclusions of Law on Case No. VAR-25-02: Mr. Mapp accepted the Conclusions
of Law as outlined in the staff report.
Order of Decision on Case No. VAR-25-02: Mr. Mapp approved VAR-25-02 with
conditions as outlined in the staff report to include crediting the adjoining property
frontage also in his possession, to the subject property as a means of increasing the
allowable signage area to 188 square feet.
Findings of Fact on Case No. SUB-70P-02: The Hearing Examiner accepted the
general facts outlined in the staff report and public testimony as Findings of Fact.
Conclusions of Law on Gase No. SUB-70P-02: Mr. Map accepted the Conclusions
of Law as outlined in the staff report.
Recommendation to Gity Gouncil: Mr. Mapp recommended approval of SUB-70P-
02 with the conditions as outlined in the staff report.
Public Hearing Closed: Mr. Mapp closed the public hearing.
C. Case No. ANN-73-02 a request by lFl Partners ll for approval to annex
approximately 30.41 acres into the City as an R-1 (Single Family Residential)
zone. The site lies to the north of Ustick Road situated between the west side of
the Phyllis Canal and the east side of Airport Avenue. The parcel extends
northward from Ustick Road to abut the south side of Copperrock Subdivision.
The site is within the Area of City lmpact and is currently zoned County R-1
(Single Family Residential). The parcels are legally described as that portion of
the SW Quarter of the SE Quarter, Section 33 T4N R3W Boise Meridian, Canyon
County ldaho, lying West of the Phyllis Canal as now located.
Testimony:
Steve Hasson, Community Development Director, presented the staff report.
John Evans, Applicant, testified in favor of the application.
Pubtic Testimony Closed: Mr. Mapp closed the testimony.
Gomprehensive Plan Analysis: Mr. Mapp found that the request was
applicable to the following Comprehensive Plan components: Property Rights -
Goal, Objective B and Policy 1; School Facilities and Transportation - Goal and
Policy 1; Land Use - Goal; Objectives Applicable to All Land Uses - Objective C;
Area of City lmpact - Objective A and Policy 5.
Findings of Fact: The Hearing Examiner accepted the general facts outlined in
the staff report as well as the facts brought forward during public testimony.
Planning & Zoning Hearing Examiner
Minutes - lune 5, 2002
IV
oo
Conctusions of Law: Mr. Mapp accepted the Conclusions of Law outlined in
the staff report.
Recommendation to City Councit: Mr. Mapp recommended approval of ANN-
73-O2with the conditions as outlined in the staff report.
planning tssues - The next regularly scheduled Hearing Examiner meeting is July
3,2002.
Adjoumment - Mr. Mapp adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p-m.v.
MINUTES ADM]NISTRATIVELY APPROVED BY HEARING EXAMINER M. JEROME ON
THE DATE NOTED BELOW
ATTEST:
M. Jerome Director
Planning & Zoning Hearing Examiner
Minutes - June 6, 2002
lllrr lr.z-
Date
a
cAsE NO. ANN-73-02
IFI PARTNERS II ANNEXATION
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF CALDWELL, IDAHO
JUNE 6,2002
AN APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY lFI PARTNERS II REQUESTING ANNEXATION OF
APPROXIMATELY 30.41 ACRES rNTO THE ctTy OF CALDWELL AS AN R-1 (SINGLE FAMTLY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE TO INCLUDE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
TABLE OF CONTENTS:I. COURSE OF PROCEEDINGS,!!. GENERAL FACTS,III. TESTIMONY,IV. APPLICABLE LEGAL ANALYSIS,V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS,VI. FINDINGS OF FACT,VII. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,VI!I RECOMMENDATION
1.1
COURSE OF PROCEEDTNGS
r I :,, ,., f.i. i ,
The Caldwell Community Development Department issued a notice of Fubliei'Flbaring on
application ANN-73-02, to be held before the Hearing Examiner on June 6th, 2002. Public
notice requirements set forth in ldaho Code, Chapter 65, Local Planning Act, were met. On May
22, 2002 notice was published in the ldaho Press Tribune, and on May 17, 2002 notice was
mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site; and, on May 30, 2002 notice
was posted on the site.
1.2 Files and exhibits relative to this application will be available for review in the Community
Development Department, Caldwell City Hall, as well as all public hearings.
GENERAL FACTS
o
t!
2.1
2.2
2.3
APPLICANT: lFl Partners ll, c/o John Evans, 5699 North Rifle Way, Garden City, lD 83703.
OWNER(S): Hal and Patricia Mickelsen, 306 Hilldrop St., Caldwell, lD 83605
REQUEST: To annex approximately 30.41 acres of land into the City as an R-1 (Single Family
Residential) zone. Mr. Evans states in his narrative that is the Applicant's futuie desiire is to
develop the property into a residential subdivision with City services. The propenty"is iontiguous
to the City limits and located within the City's Area of lmpact. ' ',.,:: lj, ... ,,, ,
LOCATION: The site lies to the north of Ustick Road situated between the West 'side of the
Phyllis Canal and the east side of Airport Avenue. The parcel extends northward from Ustick
RoadtoabutthesouthsideofCopperrockSubdivision'
2.4
Pz-z
'a"'r I
Density nf;entiar2.6
2.7
2.7.1
COMPREHE N DESIGNATION: Low
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPONENTS APPLICABLE THE REQUEST:
Propertv Riqhts: The five checklist criteria set forth by the Attorney General in the "ldaho
Regulatory Takings Act Guidelines" were reviewed by planning staff. None of the criteria were
answered in the affirmative.
2.7.2 School Facilities and Transportation: The School Districts were notified of the request through
mailingofthepublichearingnoticeonMay17,2002.
2.7.3 Land Use: Area of City lmpact - The site is located in Canyon County within the Area of City
lmpact and zoned County R-1 (Single Family Residential). Canyon County Development
Services was notified of the request through mailing of the public hearing notice on May 17,
2002.
2.7.4 Public Services,lities and Facilities:ln a memo dated May 24, 2002, the Engineering
Department provides the following:
1. Airport Avenue is designated as a major collector requiring 60 feet of rightof-weiy. Airport Avenue
is currently is platted at fifty feet of right-of-way.
, _i,ir ii,i {r( ,.,r,::
,
2. Ustick Road is designated as a principal arterial requiring 45 feet to centerline of fighl-of+Wayr'The
property currently extends to within 25 feet of the centerline of Ustick.
3. A crossing is required over the Phyllis Canal to connect Airport on both sides of the canalrs)i ilit.'.; : i'
4. Sewer service is currently available 1 130 feet north of Easy Street along the continuation of Airport
Avenue. Construction of a sewer line will be required along Airport Avenue to the intersection With
UStiCk. . :r rii t-).,vi::i:.';. r .., ,'
:,...:,.1..t .rl] i 1..,". ,..
5. The Engineering Department requests that the applicant be required to enter into a Development
Agreement to include the following:
i, r,_, :: . r ,
a) 10 feet of additional right-of-way along Airport Avenue for a total of 60 feet.
b) 20 feet of additional right-of-way along Ustick Road for a total half right-of-way of 45 feet.
c) Road crossing of Phyllis Canal along Airport Avenue. ,'\ ' ,' i i
d) Sewer line extension along Airport Avenue. ,,
;
2.7.5 Transportation: Ustick, at this location, is designated as a minor arterial'id-ctocding:rto-the
functionally classified road map approved by City Council November 19,2001.
2.7.6 Fire protection: The CFD does not object to this annexation as it is appropridteinfr:ll',fbr the city.
III TESTIMONY BEFORE p &Z GOMMISSION JUNE 6,2002: ,.,tir.:r r:t;,_;ir r)i il, i,; ,,r :
' ; jr.ii i;'1 t€ i-Si){:li,-ll;i r:.,';i"l
3.1 Steve Hasson, Community Development Director, presented the staff report'andl outlined the
facts as stated. Mr. Hasson reported that the applicant wishes to develop a Subdivision with
upper scale homes. A development agreement will be part of the annexationiSiiocesS: 'Mr:
Hasson read Article ll of the Development Agreement - Conditions of the Rezone and
Annexation - into the record. He stated that if the conditions of the Development Agreement
were not met, the Agreement and the rezone request would be null and void, thus the parcel
would default back to Canyon County and could only be developed as county:ioning. This
would interfere with the development of a subdivision
3.2 John Evans, Applicant, testified in favor of the application. Mr. Evans reported that he had
contacted Ben Weymouth, Assistant City Engineer, and discussed Articlest [ll:and;r{ oJ the
.r.fr* r'n&i,H:frra liib' r-it.,
Lr.l+,'ii!
': ::,t-ll 1\ ' I
Devetopment ngretnt. lt was determined tnat tneseQtems could be more specifically
addressed as the subdivision was developed. Mr. Evans stated that he conourred'with the-staff
report.
V
IV APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
5.3 Land Use -
OBJECTIVE C:
available.
City of Caldwell Zoning Ordinance No. 1451, aS amended ,, ) .i r \, ' i :
City of Caldwell Comprehensive Plan, aS amended :,. '.' r:r'ir'-r :ir1': '
tdaho Code, Title 67, Chapter 65, Local Planning Act 'l : ;i '':/ :\\
ldaho Code, Tiile SO, Chapter 2, bection 5A-22iMunicipal Corporations, regar(ing'annexqtion
GoMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS: The Hearing Examiner accepted the Gomprenensive
Plan components as stated:
':.. a frriluiilc;"
5.1 Prope Riqhts -
administrative action on specific property.
pOLlCy 1: Require staff to follow the Attorney General's Checklist Criteria outlined in'the ldaho
Regulatory Takings Act Guidelines prior to any proposed regulatory_or administrative.,actjon on
specific property, and to request legal counsels review if any one of the criteria is:answered in
theaffirmative. ': -'rrr;-{'-r'
'1:
5.2
I : i-1, :j r1^, ,:.rr .. .,
School Facilities and Transportation -
GoAL: To provide the on-going opportunity for school representatives of Caldwell and Vallivue
school Districts to participate in the community planning process.
poLlcy 1: lnclude the school districts in the review process when considerjhg:land-use
proposals. At a minimum, notice of the hearing for each proposal should beiprovidedito the
districts and any additional information that the di'stricts might subsequently request.
GOAL: To ensure that land use policies, restrictions, conditions and fees do not violate property
rights, adversely impact property values or create unnecessary technical limitations on the use
of the property.
'r --- - '- ' .'r "lii'r fi;i1i | :lti :
oBJECTIVE B: To identify potential takings of private property prior to a regulatory or
GOAL: To establish land-use management policies that protect property rights and the
environment, maintain " nign quality of ife, provide adequate land for all typesrofiil'w$lopment
and adequately buffer non-iornprtible uses. ' ' . , 'lj '
OBJECTIVES APPLICABLE TO ALL LAND USES:
ir' , I :
To promote growth in areas where public facilities and services are readily
AREA OF CITY IMPACT
OBJECTIVE A: To encourage development as a natural outward progressiUniof'the City's
corporate boundaries and witiin areas ihat can be immediately annexed' ' :" - tr; " "''.' ' t '
poLlCy S: Encourage growth to occur primarily as a contiguous outw"ro "*frn,ion from the
City's corporate bouniaiies. Discouragei'hopscotch" development. : i "'
-"r, liCl-itS i:rnd
r I rrlr;i'i,\.fttllli"'
VI
o
The Hearing Examiner accepted the general facts outlined in the staff report, public testimony,
and that thJApplicant will sign the proposed Development Agreement as the FindinSs of Fact'
HEARING EXAMTNER'S CONGLUSIONS OF LAW
The Hearing Examiner has the authority to hear this request and to recommend to the Mayor
and city council that the annexation is approveo or denied; the hearing was legally noticed and
posted, and was held under the requirements of ldaho code and city ordinancesil :' i ';' 1
HEARING EXAMINER',S RECOMMENDATION
! ,,,i , .i,. i.\ rr- : ,
Based on the Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law, the Hearing Examiner recommends to
the Mayor and City douncil that Case No. ANN-73-02, a request by Jghl Evans to annex and
rezone approximaterv g0.+r acres into ine city of caldwell as a R-1 (single Family Residential)
zone to include a development agreement is approved with the following conditions:
ln the event the submitted legal description is discovered to be inadequate, the applicant will be
responsible for assuming the measures necessary to provide the City an accufate legal
description
6.1
vil
7.1
vilt
8.1
8.2
g.3 The Applicant is required to dedicate 10 feet of additional right-of-way along Airport Avenue for
a total of 60 feet and 20 feet of
"ooitionur
right-of-way along-Ustick Road for a total half right-of-
wayof4Sfeet. ''lt':, ,-...'l-,,- r ' -t._::i
g.4 A crossing is required over the phyllis Canal to connect Airport on both sides on"{he canal'
g.s construction of a sewer line will be required along Airport Avenue to the intersection with Ustick
Road. ;.- . ,,
NOTE: These conditions have been placed in the attached development agreementr.r ',, ',t',,
CASE NO. ANN-73-02 WAS HEARD BY THE HEARING EXAMINER AT A PUBLIC HENRI]:{C
HELD JUNE 6,2002.
OF FACTS, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND RECOMMENDATION WAS '
HEARING EXAMINER AND SIGNED ON THE DATE NOTED BELOW.WRITTEN FI
APPROVED
NDINGS
me ring ner
''i:l'':
unity Director
r r: /r, l:,1 l r.1-r r:
HEARING EXAMITR'S FINDINGS OF FACT
-. .. _.,;tli 1 ',,i: i i,,
6afu
fiate /
oo
PUBLIC HEA.i.ll\i G CCilrlil,iEliT SHEET
{PLEASE PR.lillT CLEARLI
oL. E -,
STREET ADDR.ESS:6?7 P,LJE
CITY/STATE'ZI P: Qa'/r"C-\ , aol,
NAME OF CASE BEII.IG HEARD ,A N -73-oz
8)7o3
Check the aPProPriate line:
Applicant or Repres entaave-/
ln favor/
wish to sPeak-
do not wish to sPeak-
Neutral/
wish to sPeak-
do not wish to sPeak-
Opposed/
wish to sPeak-
do not wish to sPeak-
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
written comments may be attached to this form or you may write them in below
7*r