HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic AgencyaI
PUBLIC AGENCY
ITE,M DATE,SUBMITTED BY
oA-( fiatMD 3,lS-oZ.6-Ar^,L-dr,,c
QA,z tYtumD 3-[S-oZ-
?A s {nunlD 4 -f -DL W,ttdfu,ru:zzu*
-|e,r/K'Wt"rztYrr-
I oa
CALDWELL F!RE DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CAtDWEtt
310 South 7th Avenue
CALDWELL,IDAHO 83605
(208) 4sS3032
Prot*ttng Yow Proprty Sauing Lircs
DATE:Apil 5,2002
TO:Steve Hasson, Community Development
FROM:Douglas Brown, Assistant Chief / Fire Marshal
SUBJECT:Comments for Caldwell City Council
April15,2002 Meeting
The Caldwell Fire Department (CFD) offers the following comments regarding the following cases
to come before the Caldwell City Council on April 15,2002:
The CFD has met several times with a representative of the developer and city staff to go over
fire department issues relating to access, fire flow and fire hydrants for this project. The CFD
supports the annexation and the use and development of this facility.
Case No:
Applicant:
Project:
Location:
Case No:
Applicant:
Project:
Location:
ANN-64-02 and SUP-I53-02
Clayne Hanson
Mini-storage facility
NE corner of Montana Ave. and Ustick Road
AI\N-65-02
Brent Merrick
Annexation only
3200 Muller Lane
The CFD does not oppose this annexation. However, there are a couple of adjoining parcels on
county land that contain commercial buildings on them. These have not been plan reviewed by
the fire department and we would request that if annexation of those buildings is ever considered
that the CFD be able to enforce the current fire code requirements on them as a condition of
annexation. I
I
P D'3
trGtr[Vtr
APR - 8 2002
o
SUB-63F-01
Sagewood Development Co
Windsong Subdivision
Dorman Avenue
SUB-61F.01
Logan's Crest,Inc.
Logan's Crest Subdivision
Logan Street
C
The CFD has commented and worked with the principles of this project and has approved all fire
department criteria including street configuration, street name, turnaround, fire flow and fire
hydrant locations.
Case No:
Applicant:
Project:
Location:
Case No:
Applicant:
Project:
Location:
The CFD has commented and worked with the principles for this project and has approved all
fire department criteria including street configuration, street name, turnaround, fire flow and fire
hydrant locations.
Z
o o
trGtr[Vtr
MAR 1 5 2002
DATE:March 15,2002
TO:Steve Hasson, Community Development Director
FROM:Douglas Brown, Assistant Chief / Fire Marshal
SUBJECT:Comments for Caldwell Planning & Zoning Commission
March 28,2002 Meeting
The Caldwell Fire Department (CFD) offers the following comments regarding the following cases
to come before the Caldwell Planning &ZoningCommission on March 28,2002:
Case No:
Applicant:
Project:
Location:
ANN-65-02
Brent Merrick
n/a - annexation
3200 Muller Lane
The CFD supports this annexation but does have one possible concern. Recently Canyon County
approved the construction of a couple of new commercial buildings in this vicinity. I believe they
maybe located on this property. For whatever reason, the fire department was left out of the plan
review process on those new buildings. Therefore, the city may be annexing a couple bf "new"
commercial buildings that may not be in conformance with the fire code of Caldwell. If this
annexation involves these new buildings, then I would respectfully request thattheP&Z
Commission please consider, as a condition of annexation, that the owner submit to a fire
inspection of those buildings and agree to ensure that they will conform with the fire code
requirements of Caldwell.
1
w1/
t-
o
MEMORANDUM
STEVE HASSON
GORDON LAW, City Engineer
o
To:
From:lrl
Re:
BEN WEYMOUTH, Assistant City Engineer
Case No. ANN-65-02
Annexation Request for approximately 0.96 acres
Date March 15,2002
The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed annexation and corresponding zoning designations
for the referenced application and provides the following comments:
The Engineering Department does not oppose the Annexation, and the sewer and water systems
are capable of providing service to the area. The property is currently connected to City water
services. Sewer facilities are available approximately I 100' to the southeast. Access to these
facilities would require crossing Hwy 20126 (Franklin Blvd.).
The proposed annexation lies approximately 6700 feet NW of the nearest Airport runway, within
the low level glide path designated in the Airport Master Plan. Height restrictions may be
imposed on future development to accommodate future Airport expansions. Some overly
sensitive residents may provoke complaints and legal battles against noise associated with Airport
operations in this path. The Engineering Department recommends passive measures to limit
residents' ability to challenge existing and planned uses at the Airport. These may take the form
of Avigation easements or deed restrictions. The Engineering Department invites input from
developers on ways and means of protecting the Airport from these nuisance complaints.
D
tr[VtrtrG
{k-\
2.
1.