HomeMy WebLinkAboutCA-MI-66 Impact Fee Legist Study 1993tit• of C�Ivwell n�r�nnin�
Telephone 455-3006
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning and Zoning Department
RE: Impact Fee Legislation
DATE: January 5, 1993
memorandum
Attached for the review of the Conunission is a document which summarizes development impact
fee enabling legislation. Although the ability to collect impact fees is limited to governmental
entities located in counties with a population of 200,000 or more (Ada County only), there is the
possibility of new legislation that would enable other entities such as the City of Caldwell to
collect impact fees.
Key items within this material include:
1. Comprehensive Plan which addresses the type of public facility
2. Capital Improvements Plan or Capital Improvements Element
The current significance of these items is that the Commission is expected to consider a revised
Parks and Recreation Component in March of 1993. It would be advisable to assume that at some
point in the near future the City of Caldwell would have the ability to adopt an impact fee
ordinance. Consequently, the revised component should contain the legislative prerequisites for
adopting such an ordinance.
THROUGH AMENDMENT OF THE LEGISLATION BY THE SENATE IN THE LAST TWO
DAYS OF THE SESSION, THE BILL WAS LIMITED TO GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES
LOCATED IN COUNTIES WITH A POPULATION OF 200,000 OR MORE, i.e., ADA
COUNTY.
A SUMMARY OF THE
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE LEGISLATION
The main features of the legislation, relating to the imposition of development impact fees, in its
current form include the following;
1. Public facilities which might be constructed or expanded using impact fees as
part of the funding:
—Water supply production, treatment and distribution facilities;
•Waste water collection, treatment and disposal facilities;
--Roads, streets and bridges including rights of way, traffic signals, landscaping
and any local components of state or federal highways;
—Storm-water collection, retention, detention, treatment and disposal facilities,
flood control facilities, and bank and shore protection and enhancement
improvements;
...Parks, open space and recreation areas and related capital improvements; and
-Public safety facilities, including law enforcement, fire, emergency medical
and rescue facilities, and street lighting facilities.
2. Impact fees could be imposed, if the procedures herein are followed, by any
governmental entity whom the legislature has authorized or hereafter authorizes to adopt
ordinances. This presently includes only counties, cities and county -Fide highway districts.
3. A governmental entity desiring to adopt an impact fee ordinance is required to appoint
an advisory committee consisting of at least 5 members. At least 2 committee members shall
be active in the business of development, building or real estate.
4. Before an authorized governmental entity could adopt an ordinance requiring the
payment of impact fees as a condition of approval of development, that entity must —
a. Adopt a comprehensive plan if one has not been adopted, in the case of a
city or county;
b. Utilizing the land use assumptions most recently adopted by the
appropriate land use planning agency or agencies, develop a capital
improvements plan, or a capital improvements element to be added to an
existing comprehensive plan in coordination with the Advisory Committee
appointed by the governing body of the governmental entity desiring to
adopt an impact fee ordinance.
C. Conduct at least one public hearing on the proposed plan, after
proper notice, and additional hearings if material changes are made in the
plan, and provide information packets including the plan and a description
and map of service areas upon request;
-1-
d. Conduct a separate public hearing on the proposed development
impact fee ordinance and provide for prior notice, an informational packet
and the opportunity for affected persons to provide testimony;
e. Publish the development impact fee ordinance in a newspaper of
general circulation and delay the effective date for at least 30 days
following adoption.
5. The capital improvements plan must include:
a. A description of existing public facilities and their existing
deficiencies within the service area or areas, a reasonable estimate of all
costs related to curing the existing deficiencies, and a plan to develop the
necessary funding resources. The impact fee ordinance must establish the
acceptable level of service which applies to existing facilities as well as
new facilities.
b. A cornnutment by the governmental entity to use other available
sources of revenue to cure existing system deficiencies where practical.
C. An analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and
commitments for usage of capacity of the existing capital improvements.
d. The land use assumptions by the governmental entity.
e. A definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use,
consumption, generation or discharge of a service unit for each category
of system improvements and an equivalency or conversion table
establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses,
including residential, commercial, agricultural and industrial.
f. A description of system improvements and their costs necessitated
by and attributable to new development in the service area for a period not
to exceed 20 years, based on the approved land use assumptions, at a level
of service not to exceed the level of service adopted by the governmental
entity for new and existing facilities.
g. identification of all sources and levels of funding available to the
governmental entity for financing of the system improvements.
h. If improvements include improvements to facilities under the
jurisdiction of the State or another governmental entity, then an agreement
between those entities specifying the proportionate share of funding by
each entity.
i. A schedule setting forth estimated dates for commencing and
completing construction of all improvements identified in the capital
improvements plan.
6. The capital improvements plan must be updated at least every 5 years, using the
same procedure as for adoption of the plan initially.
7. The impact fees may only be used to fund capital improvements (having a
useful life of ten years or more) identified in the capital improvements plan, including
WM
construction, improvement, expansion or enlargement of new or existing public facilities, which
are specifically attributable to the capacity demands generated by the new development.
8. The impact fee may not exceed the proportionate share of the costs incurred by
the governmental entity in furnishing system improvements (as opposed to project
improvements) to serve the new development, taking first into consideration (a) credit , offset or
contribution of money, dedication of land or construction of system improvements, (b) payments
reasonably anticipated to be made by or as a result of a new development in the form of user
fees, debt service payments or taxes which -are dedicated for capital improvements for which
impact fees would otherwise be imposed; and (c) all other available sources of funding such
capital improvements.
9. The impact fee ordinance shall include a schedule of impact fees, specifying the
impact fee for various land uses per unit of development. The ordinance shall also provide for
individual assessment of impact fees at the option of applicants for development approval under
guidelines established in the ordinance.
10. The impact fee ordinance shall include a procedure whereby a developer may
receive a certification of the impact fee schedule or individual assessment for a particular
project, which establishes the fee for a period of one year from certification.
11. The impact fee may only be spent for system improvements in the same
category and within or for the benefit of the service area for which they were imposed. If
not appropriated for that purpose within five years and spent within seven years of collection,
or in the case of wastewater or drainage facilities, within 20 years, must be refunded to the then -
record owner.
12. The impact fee ordinance must specify the time when the fee is to be collected,
which may not be earlier than commencement of construction of the development or
issuance of the building permit or permit for installation of mobile home, or as agreed by the
parties.
13. The ordinance shall provide for refund of the impact fee if service from the
public facility never provided, a building permit is denied or abandoned, or the fee is not
appropriated and spent within the time provided.
14. Credit or reimbursement is to be given to the developer pursuant to written
agreement with the governmental entity in advance of commencement of the development for
system improvements required by the governmental entity which exceed the development
impact fee that would otherwise be required or which benefit subsequent development
projects.
15. After a transition period following adoption of an impact fee ordinance, the
impact fee will be the exclusive means of requiring payment of development exactions other
than project improvements. Where impact fees are not adopted, the existing exaction process
may continue.
16. Collection and expenditure of development impact fees are to be reported as part
of the annual audit process of the governmental entity.
17. The development impact fee ordinance must include a process for dealing with a
project which has extraordinary impact because it will result in the need for system
improvements, the cost of which will significantly exceed the sum of the development impact
fees, or will result in the need for system improvements not identified in the capital improvement
plan.
-3-