Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Responser- PUBLIC RESPONSE ITEM I DATE I SUBMITTED BY Cro,dm. z r June 24, 1998 Attn: Chairman & Commission Members CALDWELL P & Z COMMISSICIN Caldwell City Hail 621 Cleveland Blvd. Caldwel3F ID 83605 Rf:.: Proposed Stornwater Management Policy Case No. OA-17-98 Hearing Date: June 25, 1998 Dear Chairman & Commission Members: Per the noLlce received on the above case regarding adoption of the Proposed Stormwater Management Policy for the City of Caldwell, we are pleased to offer the following comments as part of the public record. These comments reference page number and/or section number: Page 7 • Sec. 101.1, GENERAL RULES. In several sections, this proposed policy refers to the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC) commonly adopted and used throughout the State of Idaho, however the City of Caldwell has never officially adopted ISPWC. We recommend the City adopt ISPWC before any new stornwater policy. • Sec. 101.1.1 GRANDFATHER CLAUSE. We suggest revising the last sentence to read: "The setting of storm drainage practices for City sponsored street projects within the confines of the City owned right-of-way shall be directed by the City Engineer and will also be designed and constructed in accoxdanoe with this policy." j Page B • Sec. 101.1.6, ENGINEER'S RULE. Because single -lot developments less than 1 acre could include a commercial building with considerable surrounding hard surface parking areas that collectively contribute significantly to runoff, there should be no minimum size of development requiring professional engineering or design. Paz 11 • Sec. 102.2.2. EASEMENTS. Second sentence excludes landscaping over these facilities. Since they are difficult to conceal, we recommend that developers and homeowner's be allowed to landscape in these easements to enhance overall attractiveness and visual appeal of developments. Page 14 • Sec. 102.8 GUTTER CAPACITY. The design and construction standards for Canyon County, local Highway DISLricLs, and surrounding municipalities all provide for and permit gutter grades less than or flatter than 0.4%. We recommend Caldwell provide for and adopt 0.3% minimum gutter grade. Page 16 • Section 103.2.1, SITE RUNOFF. It appears that a great deal of this policy manual has been taken and/or abridged from the Ada County Highway District, or ACHD manual. Our comparison with this manual has not found any reference or basis for a maximum discharge rate of 1 miner's inch per acre. What is the basis or foundation for this rate's Why haven't other jurisdictions adopted this discharge rate criteria? • Sec. 103.2.4, LOCATION OF STORAGE FACILITIES. This section specifies that stormwater retention and detention facilities be located on private property or on common lots in larger developments. If so who is the r C C 3 responsible party? Page 17 Homeowner's Association or the City? • Sec. 103.2.7, IDAHO STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS. How will the Southwest District Health Department or IDWR handle this in regards to fee assessment and administration? Have they been consulted about this function? • Sec. 103.4, OPERATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY. If the City is not to have primary operation and maintenance responsibility, who will have it? If this is to fall to the Homeowner or Property Owner, do they really understand their associated liabilities and maintenance responsibilities? How will they understand the technical design and operational functions of these systems in the future? Page 22 • Table 4 - INFILTRATION RATES. We suggest attaching the applicable SCS Soil Type table for cross-referencing. In addition, because the State of Idaho Division of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has extensively addressed this subject in their Technical Guidance Manual, who not incorporate the same Infiltration/ Percolation Rates and data? Page 25 • Sec. 105.3.2, TESTING. This is seems to be an arbitrary provision. Why are requirements in excess of ISPWC required? Also, see our first :.omment in this letter regarding ISPWC. Conclusion This proposed policy is very complex, far-reaching, and will substantially increase all development casts including planning, engineering, construction, and administrative costs to all involved parties. Have the overall costs and impacts of this policy on landowners, developers, taxpayers and the City been fully evaluated? p C C4 We lock forward to your respOn8e Lo the above and we thank you for your consideration of our comments and concerns. Sincerely, William J. Mason, EARL & ASSOCIATES, INC. EARL & ASSOCIATES, INC. IERL ald L. rl, President & ASSOCIATES, INC. rr" Fila IN REPLY REFER TO- r- r- United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Snake River Area Office 214 Broadway Avenue Boise, Idaho 83702-7298 SRAOW-6113 June 3, 1998 Legislation Review Mr. Gordon Law Caldwell City Engineer City of Caldwell 621 Cleveland Blvd. Caldwell ID 83605 Subject: Review of Draft Storm Water Management Policy Dear Gordon: Enclosed for your consideration are staff comments regarding this proposed ordinance. We wholeheartedly support this policy and sincerely appreciate its sound engineering and practical utility. Call John Caywood (ph. 334-1463) if we can be of any assistance. Sincerely, Enclosure 100.2.1.2. Accommodate storm water and other flows from upstream lands and developments by providing adequate WROMOOcM conveyance facilities through development sites. 100.2.2.2•Control the quantity of water '# contaminants ' eathrough construction of facilities to treat storm runoff. 11 • •1 ,ra-P UMe 4, MOM@V44• Design and implement a control system to Tile mailageLuellt erosion from new developments and resulting sediment load in receiving waters' contrw± System;--- The sources of sediment may be controlled through the use of diversions, ground cover, lined channels, sediment basins, sediment control structures, filtering and screening membranes or other approved methods, 1 / .. 1 . • 1 m The City has constitutional authority as a municipal corporation to promulgate regulations governing the discharge of storm water onto the {public -way } -of ri ht y g ;c or into the City's storm water system.# x, 100.3.5 Other There '� may- other legal authorities, which the City may assert from time to time. 101.1.1 Grandfather ClausQ Line 11: The setting of storm drainage practices for City sponsored street projects within the confines of City owned right-of-way shall be directed by the City Engineers AI 101.1.2 Downstream Rule Line 6:("reasonable") ATM rY %OIC N• ���+M../ !v• Y'yS ��yy^',:,.y..{.•{,....Ky. parr...... s•,a:e?+n!nPf!' .liinw..:c. , y a •na . a x•x .s rY:C£9`n.,c w.w,.S n 101.1.4 rrr`gation Rule Line 1- ( irrigation entity) �'e�M "rIM `° ��, 'urisdiction rr. ,yaa' a�rr�:es:a:•a:•w:y .o-•:ay, �4",v,£ur r s<+:s. fair rc' �{.ELY .rr.r run• Y • =emu' Lrr �'" � � n* ' �°" ?,�''.,ar' a' :r .,, . ���`o�, ' 4�.. a ' ✓r,�;A' a��:�'i�'��'C+� ���orY,. • � r +err •�', �'•.c.3k. o�..�.:. S7: r! .i,..� .ro��' '¢rcyifin'!l: who-. s.0ir, .4; (sX C Yl'rl 101.1.5 Discharge Rule Line 5: (entity operating or maintaining the ditch, drain or and :z �, •:.: •4C. x.v Paragraph 2: The rate of discharge shall be calculated using the proper methodology. The peak rate for areas up to eighty acres shall be calculated using the Rational Method or approved derivatives. The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) method TR No. 55 shall be used for areas larger than eighty acres. i�:i�F11tl,e.: rIM,r Z.V-1Y rxr:•.O::f.' . 4r:.i4.+i•:i rr: is r: Af" 102.2 LOCATION �`'"'''�' .z>: Storm water conveyance components may be located in public right - of -wa :AafY..h. : Y :�•� or on private property in h r /l/Ai easements. 102.2.2 Easements Last sentence: Easements running along situated such that the centerline of t' 105.2 IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES lines shall be 05/21/98 11:48 '$ PIONEER IRRG DIS U 001/001 j - Pioneer Irrig1tion District R a ecx 426 • CALDWELL, IDAHO 63' M6 LONNIE a FREEMAN Sup@dmmnd@W NAM E. KMAAMER sepemry / Trwsuraf May 20, 1998 Mr. Gordon Law, City Engineer City of Caldwell FAX: 455-3003 Dear Mr. Law f a andum Pioneer 998from LiAndaJ=esiregarding thereceipt oDrafteOfrStormwaterd May 6, 1998 from L management Policy --April, 1998, inviting responses to the same. to Pioneer Basedsupooned thisrreecommendati.ons, we , Scott would,likerto1submit the Draft. Base p the following comments. On. Page 8, under 101.1.5 Di.schar a Rule, we would like to request a couple of additions, so t at t e p aragr aph reads as ows: in 'Any development proposing to discharge off -site, in cotmli ce with this policy, shall notify in writing, and obtain'the written approvals of the owner and the entity which'maintains or o eraCes t e ditch, rain or pond into w is lsc arge s 3 1 occur- n addition, - Please be further advised Pioneer Irrigation District desires to continue to participate in the development of this stormwater manage- ment policy, and woul�heike to rforlreview•notices l'hank you for1keepng subsequent drafts of policy us informed. Sincerely, Naida E. Kelleher Secretary -Treasurer