Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHPC Sept 23 1993 minutesIo Historic Preservation Commission 621 CLEVELAND BLVD, CALDWELL, IDAHO 83605 TEL.: (208)4s5-3006 FAX 455-3003 Caldwell Depor Facing S€venth Ave. (1906) MINUTES Meefing of September 23, 1993 Present: Chair Madeline Buckendorf, Carol Burbanlq Elaine Carpenter, Bill Gigray Itr, Vivian McKay, Steve Maughan. Absent: Tom Ensley, Elaine Irppert; Staff: Dennis Crooks, Liz Yeary Guests: l,arry Bledsoe, Kathy Clayton-Wonderlich, Norm Holm, Stan Olson, J.R. Schiller, Carol West The September 23, 1993 meeting of the Historic Preservation Corrunission was called to order in the City Council Chambers at 7:20 pm. following a mrall reception. Madeline Buckendorf opened the meeting, explaining that this was another in a series of town hall meetings, and subsequently handed the coordination of the meeting to Bill Gigray III, who is serving as moderator of all the sessions. Mr. Gigray welcomed everyone to the meeting particularly those representatives from the City of Nampa, who had graciously agreed to share their experiences of downtown revitalization with Caldwell. Bill explained that the Commission had aheady met with Boise and Pocatello. After the meeting with Pocatello it was agreed to set up a meeting with Nampa, since that city is our neighbor, and review their experience. L,arry Bledsoe, City Engineer, began by explaining that revitalization did not follow a logical path but somehow ended up a $,rccess. In 1982, buildings were closed, weeds were present, and it was obvious that something had to be done. The City Engineering office initiated the process by compiling an iaventory of downtown businesses and properties. A sketch map and illustrations of the downtown area were prepared and reviewed to see what could be done to improve the appearance. The business people then met with the City and there was an overwheLning response of support. Norm HoLn explained that the method used to finance this was a Business [nprovement Dislrict @ID) which is a means by which cities or certain people within a city can tax themselves for improvements. The City was involved in the process from the begfurring but it was the merchants and business owners who had the enthusiasm to get it going. There was a one time assessme[t of tlte business owners to provide funds for the development of a Plan for the downtown. Since they were also seeking Community Block Development Grants from the Departrnent of Commerce they had to have a Plan. People went out and petitioned other businesses to sigr for the assessnent rate. This generated enough money to prepare the Plan. I o o Goering and others went to a meeting of a Development Association Meeting in Oregon when the Main Street Program was discussed. They brought the information back and with that the downtown businessmen got enough support to get things off the ground. J.R. Schiller said that in order to demonstrate the need for a program, photos were taken of a significant block and people realized how bad things were. One building was tom down and became more parking for the downtown. They designed a medium that people could visualize and see and get other people excited about. larry went on to explain that once a plan was developed tlte next step was to develop a model block. People have difficulty envisioning a plan and seeing what it will look like on the ground. There was one block of which rhe City owned a third, so the Ciry offered a lot of the fu"diog and the owners offered the rest and so a protoq?e was bom which generated a lot of enthusiasm. The rest of the Downtown was a combination of City money, local money, and grants. Streets were reconstructed. In the design and construction an effort was made to try and create a physical identity to the downtown. The same theme was carried on in every sphere, including landscaping and colors so that it made a physical identity. J.R. Schiller was Chairman of the Committee that helped get the second BID organized. He is still the President of the corporation that runs BID #2. J.R. explained that the theory behind #2 was that you can make physical improvements but if you still have empty buildings and businesses leaving, you have not accomp[shed anything. The improvements will deteriorate and no-one will come down anyway. So the idea was to get an organization downtown that helps promote business downtown. This is allowed by state taw where there is an organization of the business owners downtown, not the property owners. Petitions were signed asking the City Council to promote this. The total assessable area was calculated and there had to be business representing 500/o or more of the total area. The City Council will create business improvement district and create an assessment against the business owners. The initial budget was $4O,O0O per year and it is still the same. Once that is created the City has an option of crediting themselves or they can give it to a corporation for the purposes of operating, which is what happened in Nampa. A non-profit corporation was formed. Members of the corporation were the business owners who were pafng the assessment. They elected a Board of Directors and Officers. They hired a manager and, now, co-directors for the day to day operation of Downtown. They follow a Main Street program: a) to put on promotions to draw customers downtown;b) economic development which is to attract new businesses and keep the ones already there; c) concentrate on beautification which is a continuing process - streets, sidewalks, facades, banners. d) organization This is the way it has been operating for the past nine years. The first floor vacancy at the beginning was 25010. It is now 3.78010. 2 o o Kathy Wonderlich and Carol West, Co-Directors of Downtown Nampa Merchants' Association, then showed some slides of downtown Nampa, some before, some after revitalization. Some of the ideas for improvement: sidewalk cafes, murals, replacing dilapidated buildings with parking space, dates and names on buildings, light poles, banners. If two projected sales go through, the vacancy rate will be 1.6010. The strongest avenue that the ofEce has approached is economic development. They contacted all of the owners of the buildings and got tlreir names. The central ofEce Downtown is designed for people to come to and find out information about downtown vacancies. Forry people were placed in 32 months without any commission. They paid for signs to be painted that can be put in the vacant buildings. Realtors are encouraged to go through Downtown. They have a lot of professional uses downtown and are trying to recruit some good retail. That is the direction in which they are moving now. BID #2, assessment was $220, $1,650 per year, 6.66 per square foot, which was based on lot area not buildings. A majority of businesses fit in the $2Oo/year range. This generates $45,000 per year. Businesses are allowed there the first year without :rn assessment by State [aw. Lend services to people. The main intent of Downtown is to get people downtown. More people increases retail business. Downtown will not attract major chain stores but will attract smaller quality stores tllat offer special services. Events are put on to draw people downtown. Four major events a yezu were scheduled to bring people downtown. Th"y try to stay with those four each year. If one does not work out they replace it with another. e.g.Snake fuver Stampede Craft show entertainment, food booths, sidewalk sales Christmas A Promotions Committee does all the work. The biggest success is Halloween. Five thousand children come downtown. They bring 5,000 parents... In response to a question from the floor, Larry Bledsoe responded that planning took about six months to get a plan together. Thirty people served on the original planning committee. The vital thing was that the businesses were involved at the very beginning and got this going. They were part of the planning process. Participation helped to maintain enthusiasm and deter negative comment and criticism. There were waning years, when the whole economy was in a bad way. It would be a lot easier now with the economy going so well. But the work went on even during those bad times. So when the economy improved they were ready to go with it. 3 O o The general consensus was that Caldwell has a nice historic downtown, which Nampa did not have so there would be less to fix. with prices in Meridian and Boise so high and a strong economy, now is the perfect time for Caldwell to do something. Everything which will not be used by a vehicle is converted to pedestrian use so there is not a lot of dead land. With downtown traffic pattems it is not necessary to maintain a standard gnd type street system. Some streets function as parking lots. There has to be some way to treat the sidewalks so it has some physical identiry. A plan could be developed in phases. As an alternative to brick, the sidewalks could be painted (colored concrete). Decorative, uniform lighting is also an important feature. Nampa went to a much higher level of light. Originally downtown was lit for the automobile. Now the area is lit for pedestrian use. Landscaping is also necessary to soften and bring a warmth to the downtown area. It was recommended to hire a qualified landscape architect, and to plant rees that do not get too big. Larry said that he crawled in every basement to check for old coal chutes. Everyone felt good about what was in their business. The City could not run the show, just a mechanism to help the people get what they want. The Nampa visitors offered to share materials with Caldwell on what steps were taken. There has been a restoration done involving the architecture and upgrading the facades of the buildings. They worked with the owners. The City came up with an idea and matching funds were made available to restore frontages. Photographs were taken to !ry to pick up the historic character of the buildings. one or two people were willing to work on their buildings and it snowballed. Awnings added a lot to the building without too much effort or cost. There is an advantage to doing things as a group. The focus was not exclusively historic since Nampa does not have the wealth of historic buildings that Caldwell does. Key problems were parking. But parking can be a perceived problem rather than a real problem. They did a comparative study involving the downtown and Karcher Mall. The square footage of a quarter of a mile square and the parking spaces for the downtown was compared to that for the shopping center and the figures were almost the same. The panel members were very encouraging to Caldwell and emphasized the importance of the business owners getting involved. Bill Gigray thanked them for extending their time and effort. He felt the nefi step was an interim report to the new City Council administration. Discussion of draft of the report could take place at the october meeting. With no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Commission will be October 28, 1993. 4 n;snec\ttv submitted, L V< -._^_,._ -Ui Liz Yeary, Secrelary