HomeMy WebLinkAboutHPC December 7 1989 minuteI oo
I
CITT OF CALDTELL
HISTORTC PRESERVATION CO}IHISEION HINUTEg
Dccclber 7, f989
The meeting was called to order at 7:OCr p.mo in the City HaII
conference room by the Chairman, Tom Ensley. Present weres
Nathelle Oates, Chuck Randolph, Art Honey, Dennis Crooks and Teri
Brandt.
Minutes from the November 2, f989 meeting were distributed.
Charrman Tom Ensley opened the rneeting wrth an overvlew of the
agenda and hrghlighted items that should be accomplrshed. Of
slgnrftcance hras the need to update the grant applrcation and
consider congultant recommendations to include preparation of a
more specific time tablee solicitation of bids, sub-contractor
selection, lrmrttng historrcal survey sites to a more manageable
number and consrdering walking tours asl a separate prolect.
Chairman Ensley next asked for detarled reports
survey teans and the results of their findings.
from the si te
I Art Honey reported on his area and rndrcated there $rere
a numtrer of candrdates and that' his list needed addecl
ref r nement .
Chuck Randolph reported on his area and indicated that
there was a wealth of sltes in that particular
quadrant. Many of the stgnrf icant sites rrere crted
both from an architecturarr/desrgn perspect ive as wel r
a9 an historical/ownership perspective.
NatheI Ie Oates and Teri Brandt foI lowed wrth a
presentation of results of their survey. They crted
They cited the problen of Iarge numbers of
significant sites and the different perspectives and
philosophieg that entered into a specific selection.
4 Tom Ens1ey and Dennis Crooks reported on their area.
Within their quadrant, the number of chosen sites hras
fairly limited wlth the selction based primarily on
external appearance such as architecture, design
featureg and promrnent location.
Af ter the team presentationsr soll€ discussion occured and it was
unanimously decrdect by the committee that the frnal number of
historical srtes selected would be l.lmrted to threnty-f ive (25).
AdditionaIly, a method and gelection process for achreving the
final Irst was drscussed and agreed upon by the committee as
fol lows:
z
I
I a o o
Each team wag to compile a list of ten (1O) candidateE
wrthin their respect ive review areas and submit them to
Dennrs at the Planning and Zoning Department as soon asl
possible. It was understood that, due to the wealth of
srtes withrn therr area , the team of Chuck and Sylvra
would have flexrbrlity to submit more than ten (10)
cand idates.
Dennrs wrII consolirlate the lists into one list of 4O+
potentral grtes and distribute the revrsed cumulatlve
list to each of the commrttee members.
Armed wrth the revrsed conulative Iist. each comnrttee
member was to re-t nspect and re-survey the 4O+ sites
throughout the entire survey area (a11 quadrants) and
choose twenty-frve (25i historrcal site candrdates from
that ltst. Each memtrere' list of ZS ls to be submitted
to Dennrs at the Plannrng and Zonrng Department no
later than Monday, January B.
Dennrs wrll consolrdate lists and tabulate results of
the survey and present results to the committee at the
next Historical Preservation Committee meetlng.
Historical Preservatron Committee will. make selection
of final 25 historical sites at the scheduled meeting
of Thursday, January 1lth at TzOO p.[I.
)(
I
2.
3.
4.
5
The meeting concluded with a brref discussion andstatus of the Union Pacific Railroad Depot and a
the downtown commercial district.
report on
d iscussion
theof
As there was
p.Ill.
Respectful 1y submitted,
no further busrness, the nreeting adiourned at 8:5O
Dennis Crook Se
Planning and Zoning Director
/.